Palavras-chave
Posterior Analytics II.19
Episteme
Ancient greek philosophy
Ancient greek epistemology
Como Citar
Resumo
This article sketches, and works to motivate, a controversial approach to Posterior Analytics II.19. But its primary goal is to recommend a novel solution to one particular interpretive aporia that’s especially vexed recent scholars working on Post. An. II.19. The aporia concerns how to understand the enigmatic ē ek pantos... (≈ “or from all...”) in the genealogical account of foundational knowledge at II.19 100a3-9. Our proposed solution to the aporia is discussed in connection with a number of larger philosophical issues concerning Aristotle’s theory of epistē mē.
Referências
Adamson, P. “Posterior Analytics 2.19: A dialogue with Plato?”. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 54(S107), pp. 1-19, 2010.
Badaw¯ı, A. Mant. iq Arist.¯u (Organon Aristotelis) Vol. I-III. Cairo: Maktabat D¯ar al-Kutub almis. riya, 1948-52.
Barnes, J. Aristotle: Posterior Analytics: Translation and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon, 1975/1993.
Bekker, I. Aristoteles Graece Vol. I. Berlin: Reimer, 1831.
Berti, E. Aristotle on Science: The Posterior Analytics. Padua: Antenore, 1981.
Biard, J. Raison et Démonstration: Les Commentaires Médiévaux sur Les Seconds Analytiques. Turnhout: Brepols, 2015.
Bolton, R. “Essentialism and semantic theory in Aristotle: Posterior Analytics, II.7-10”. Philosophical Review, 85(4), pp. 514-544, 1976.
Bolton, R. and Code, A. “Aristotle on Knowledge”. In S. Hetherington (ed.) (2012), pp. 55-78.
Brockmann, C. “Das Papyrusfragment und die ältesten byzantinischen Textzeugen der Analytika des Aristoteles”. Philologus, 148(1), pp. 50-63, 2004.
Bronstein, D. “Aristotle’s critique of Plato’s theory of innate knowledge”. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, 19, pp. 126-139, 2016.
Bronstein, D. Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning: The Posterior Analytics. Oxford: OUP, 2016.
Brunschwig, J. “L’Objet et la structure des Seconds Analytiques d’apres Aristote”. In E. Berti (ed.) (1981), pp. 61-96.
Charles, D. Aristotle on Meaning and Essence. Oxford: Clarendon, 2000. de Haas, F. and Leunissen, M. and Martijn, M. Interpreting Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics in Late Antiquity and Beyond. Leiden: Brill, 2010.
Detel, W. Aristoteles: Analytica Posteriora: Übersetzt und Erläutert Vol. I-II. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1993.
Ebbesen, S. “[Review of] F. de Haas, M. Leunissen and M. Martijn, eds., Interpreting Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics in Late Antiquity and Beyond”. Aestimatio, 9, pp. 355-366, 2012.
Ebbesen, S. “The Posterior Analytics 1100-1400 in East and West”. In J. Biard (ed.) (2015), pp. 11- 30.
Fine, G. The Possibility of Inquiry: Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus. Oxford: OUP, 2014.
Gasser-Wingate, M. “Aristotle on induction and first principles”. Philosophers Imprint, 16(4), pp. 1-20, 2016.
Gregorić, P. and Grgić, F. “Aristotle’s notion of experience”. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 88(1), pp. 1-30, 2006.
Goulet, R. Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques Vol. I. Paris: CNRS Editions, 1989.
Hasper, P. S. “A new independent group of manuscripts for Aristotle’s Sophistici Elenchi”. Work-in-progress.
Hasper, P. S. and Yurdin, J. “Between perception and scientific knowledge: Aristotle’s account of experience”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 47, pp. 119-150, 2014.
Hayduck, M. Eustratii in Analyticorum Posteriorum Librum Secundum Commentarium (CAG Vol. XXI.1). Berlin: Reimer, 1907. Hetherington, S. Epistemology: The Key Thinkers. London: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Le Blond, J. M. Logique et Méthode chez Aristote. Paris: J Vrin, 1939/1970.
Moraux, P. Le Commentaire d’Alexandre d’Aphrodise aux Seconds Analytiques d’Aristote. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1979.
Minio-Paluello, L. “Note sull’ Aristotele latino medievale”. Rivisita di filosofia neo-scolastica, 43, pp. 97-124, 1951.
Minio-Paluello, L. Analytica Posteriora: Transl. Ionnis et Anon. et Gerardi. et recensio Guillelmi de Moerbeka (AL Vol. IV.1-3). BrugesParis: Desclée de Brouwer, 1953-54
Peters, F. Aristoteles Arabus: The Oriental Translations and Commentaries on the Aristotelian Corpus. Leiden: Brill, 1968.
Primavesi, O. “Aristotle’s Metaphysics A: A New Critical Edition with Introduction”. In C. Steel (ed.) (2010), pp. 385-516.
Reinsch, D. R.. “Fragmente einer OrganonHandschrift vom Beginn des zehnten Jahrhunderts aus dem Katharinenkloster auf dem Berge Sinai”. Philologus, 145, pp. 57-69, 2001.
Ross, W.D. Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary: Translation and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon, 1949.
Smith, R. “Immediate propositions and Aristotle’s proof theory”. Ancient Philosophy, 6, pp. 47-68, 1986.
Sorabji, R. “The Ancient commentators on concept formation”. In F. de Haas, M. Leunissen, and M. Martijn (ed.) (2010), pp. 3-26.
Steel, C. Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford: OUP, 2012.
Torraca, L. “Il Cod. Vat. Barberinianus Gr. 87 e il testo delle Categorie di Aristotele”. Bollettino del Comitato per la preparazione della Edizione Nazionale dei Classici Greci e Latini, 11, pp. 91- 108, 1963.
Tuominen, M. “Back to Posterior Analytics II 19: Aristotle on the knowledge of principles”. Apeiron, 43, pp. 115-143, 2010.
Waitz, T. Aristotelis Organon Graece Vol. I-II. Leipzig: Hahn, 1844-46.
Wallies, M. Themistii Analyticorum Posteriorum Paraphrasis (CAG Vol. V.1). Berlin: Reimer, 1900.
Wallies, M. Ioannis Philoponi in Aristotelis Analytica Posteriora Commentaria cum Anonymo in Librum II (CAG Vol. XIII.3). Berlin: Reimer, 1909.
Walzer, R.. “New light on the Arabic translations of Aristotle”. Oriens, 6, pp. 91-142, 1953.
Williams, M. Studies in the Manuscript Tradition of Aristotle’s Analytica. Königstein: Hain, 1984.
Downloads
