Banner Portal
Descrição de situações
PDF (English)

Palavras-chave

Contextualismo
Conhecimento

Como Citar

VENTURINHA, Nuno; CARVALHO, Mercelo; CUTER , João V. G.; SILVA, Marcos; DALL’AGNOL , Darlei. Descrição de situações: um ensaio em epistemologia contextualista. Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia, Campinas, SP, v. 43, n. 3, p. 164–258, 2021. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8664314. Acesso em: 8 jul. 2024.

Resumo

O simpósio deste livro é composto por um resumo do livro Description of Situations: An Essay in Contextualist Epistemology (Springer, 2018) de Nuno Venturinha juntamente com quatro comentários críticos sobre diferentes aspectos do livro de Marcelo Carvalho, João Vergílio Gallerani Cuter, Marcos Silva e Darlei Dallgnol , e as respostas do autor.

PDF (English)

Referências

AIKIN, S. and DABAY, T. (2019). Pragmatist AntiSkepticism: at What Price?, in K. McCain and T. Poston (eds.), The Mystery of Skepticism: New Explorations. Leiden: Brill, 105-127.

BAUMANN, P. (2016). Knowledge across Contexts: A Problem for Subject-Sensitive Invariantism. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 55(2), 363-380.

BLAAUW, M. (2008). Subject Sensitive Invariantism: In memoriam. The Philosophical Quarterly 58(231), 318-325.

BLACKBURN, S. (1981). Reply: Rule-Following and Moral Realism, in S. Holtzman and C. Leich (eds.), Wittgenstein: To Follow a Rule. London: Routledge, 163-187.

BLOME-TILLMANN, M. (2009). Contextualism, Subject-Sensitive Invariantism, and the Interaction of ‘Knowledge’-Ascriptions with Modal and Temporal Operators. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79(2), 315- 331.

BOLZANO, B. (2014). Theory of Science, vol. 1, tr. P. Rusnock and R. George. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

BONCOMPAGNI, A. (forthcoming). On Contexts, Hinges, and Impossible Mistakes. Logos & Episteme.

BRANDOM, R. (1994). Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

______ (2000). Articulating Reasons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

BRENDEL, E. (2012). Knowledge, Contextualism, and Moorean Paradox, in C. Jäger and W. Löffler (eds.), Epistemology: Contexts, Values, Disagreements. Frankfurt: Ontos, 15-40.

BROUWER, L. E. J. (1907). Over de Grondslagen der Wiskunde (On the Foundations of Mathematics), Ph.D. thesis. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.

_____ (1908). De onbetrouwbaarheid der logische principes (The Unreliability of the Logical Principles). Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 2, 152-158.

BROWN, J. (2008). Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and the Knowledge Norm for Practical Reasoning. Noûs 42(2), 167-189.

______ (2018). Fallibilism: Evidence and Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

BUENO, O. and COLYVAN, M. (2004). Logical NonApriorism and the “Law” of Non-Contradiction, in G. Priest, J. C. Beall and B. Armour-Garb (eds.), The Law of NonContradiction: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 156-175.

CARNIELLI, W. and RODRIGUES, A. (2015a). Towards a Philosophical Understanding of the Logics of Formal Inconsistency. Manuscrito 38(2), 155-184.

______ (2015b). On the Philosophy and Mathematics of the Logics of Formal Inconsistency, in J.-Y. Beziau, M. Chakraborty and S. Dutta (eds.), New Directions in Paraconsistent Logic. New Delhi: Springer, 57-88.

CARVALHO, M. (2018). O ser e o sonho: observações sobre Descartes, Wittgenstein e Bento Prado Júnior, in J. S. do Carmo and R. C. Saucedo (eds.), Linguagem e Cognição. Pelotas: NEPFIL Online, 268-291.

______ (2019). El Medio y el Fin - Wittgenstein y los cambios en el concepto de gramática entre 1930 y 1936, in A. Tomasini Bassols (ed.), Wittgenstein: Enredos, elucidaciones y analisis gramaticales. Ciudad de México: Sotano.

CHISHOLM, R. M. (1986). Self-Profile, in R. J. Bogdan (ed.), Roderick M. Chisholm. Dordrecht: Springer, 3-77.

COHEN, S. (1986). Knowledge and Context. The Journal of Philosophy 83, 574-583.

______ (1987). Knowledge, Context, and Social Standards. Synthese 73, 3-26.

______ (1988). How to be a Fallibilist. Philosophical Perspectives 2, 91-123.

______ (1999). Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons. Philosophical Perspectives 13, 57-89.

______ (2000). Contextualism and Skepticism. Philosophical Issues 10, 94-107.

COLIVA A. (2015). Extended Rationality: A Hinge Epistemology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

CUTER, J. V. G. (2003). A Ética do Tractatus. Analytica 7(2), 43-58.

______ (2012). Tractarian Aesthetics, in A. Arbo, M. Le Du and S. Plaud (eds.), Wittgenstein and Aesthetics: Perspectives and Debates. Frankfurt: Ontos.

DA COSTA, N. C. A. (1958). Nota sobre o conceito de contradição. Anais da Sociedade Paranaense de Matemática 1, 6-8.

______ (1959). Observações sobre o conceito de existência em matemática. Anais da Sociedade Paranaense de Matemática 2, 16-19.

DAVIS, W. A. (2017). Loose Use and Belief Variation, in J. J. Ichikawa (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Contextualism. Abingdon: Routledge, 218-229.

DEROSE, K. (1991). Epistemic Possibilities. The Philosophical Review 100(4), 581-605.

______ (1992). Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52(4), 913-929.

______ (2004). The Problem with Subject-Sensitive Invariantism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68(2), 346-350.

______ (2009). The Case for Contextualism: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context, Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

______ (2017). The Appearance of Ignorance: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

DUTILH NOVAES, C. (2013). A Dialogical Account of Deductive Reasoning as a Case Study for how Culture shapes Cognition. Journal of Cognition and Culture 13(5), 459-482.

______ (2015). A Dialogical, Multi-Agent Account of the Normativity of Logic. Dialectica 69(4), 587-609.

______ (2016). Reductio Ad Absurdum from a Dialogical Perspective. Philosophical Studies 173, 2605-2628.

ENGEL JR., M. (2004). What’s Wrong with Contextualism, and a Noncontextualist Resolution of the Skeptical Paradox. Erkenntnis 61, 203-231.

EVANS, I. and SMITH, N. D. (2012). Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity Press.

FANTL, J. and MCGRATH, M. (2002). Evidence, Pragmatics, and Justification. The Philosophical Review, 111(1), 67-94. F

ELDMAN, R. (1999). Contextualism and Skepticism. Philosophical Perspectives 13, 91-114.

______ (2001). Skeptical Problems, Contextualist Solutions. Philosophical Studies 103, 61-85

______ (2004). Freedom and Contextualism, in J. K. Campbell, M. O’Rourke and D. Shier (eds.), Freedom and Determinism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 255-276.

FOGELIN, R. (1985). The Logic of Deep Disagreements. Informal Logic 7, 1-8.

FREGE, G. (1993). Logische Untersuchungen, ed. G. Patzig. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

HACKING, I. (1967). Possibility. The Philosophical Review 76(2), 143-168.

HANDFIELD, T. (2012). A Philosophical Guide to Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

HANNON, M. (2019). What’s the Point of Knowledge? A Function-First Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.

HAWTHORNE, J. (2004). Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

HERMBERG, K. (2006). Husserl’s Phenomenology: Knowledge, Objectivity and Others. London: Continuum.

______ (2011). Husserl’s (even-more) Social Epistemology, in P. Vandevelde and K. Hermberg (eds.), Variations on Truth: Approaches in Contemporary Phenomenology. London: Continuum, 161-176.

HEYTING, A. (1928). Prize essay on the formalization of intuitionistic logic.

______ (1930). Die formalen Regeln der intuitionistischen Logik (I-III). Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie von Wissenschaften, 42–56, 57-71, 158-169.

HUSSERL, E. (1973). Experience and Judgment: Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic, ed. L. Landgrebe, tr. J. S. Churchill and K. Ameriks. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

KLEIST, H. v. (1961). Sämtliche Werke und Briefe, Zweiter Band, ed. H. Sembdner. München: Carl Hanser.

LEHNER, C. (2014). Einstein’s Realism and His Critique of Quantum Mechanics, in M. Janssen and C. Lehner (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Einstein. New York: Cambridge University Press, 306-353.

LEWIS, D. (1983). Scorekeeping in a Language Game, in Philosophical Papers, vol. I. New York: Oxford University Press, 233-249.

______ (1999). Elusive Knowledge, in Papers in Metaphysics and Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 418-445.

______ (2001). Forget about the “Correspondence Theory of Truth”. Analysis 61, 275-280.

MCDOWELL, J. (1981). Non-Cognitivsm and Rulefollowing, in S. Holtzman and C. Leich (eds.), Wittgenstein: To Follow a Rule. London: Routledge, 141-162.

MOSER, P. K. (1989). Knowledge and Evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

MOYAL-SHARROCK, D. (2016). The Animal in Epistemology: Wittgenstein’s Enactivist Solution to the Problem of Regress, in A. Coliva and D. Moyal-Sharrock (eds.) Hinge Epistemology. Leiden: Brill, 24-47.

NIETZSCHE, F. (1979). Philosophy and Truth: Selections from Nietzsche’s Notebooks of the Early 1870s, ed. D. Breazeale. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

PAIS, A. (2005). “Subtle is the Lord…”: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

PRADO JR., B. (2004). Erro, Ilusão, Loucura: Ensaios. São Paulo: Editora 34.

______ (2017). Ipseitas, ed. V. Safatle. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.

PRIEST, G., TANAKA, K. and WEBER, Z. (2018). Paraconsistent Logic, in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/lo gic-paraconsistent/

PRITCHARD, D. (2012). Wittgenstein and the Groundlessness of our Believing. Synthese 189, 255-272.

______ (2016). Epistemic Angst: Radical Skepticism and the Groundlessness of our Believing. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

ROVELLI, C. (2016). Seven Brief Lessons on Physics, tr. S. Carnell and E. Segre. London: Penguin. RUSSELL, B. (1905). On Denoting. Mind 14(56), 479- 493.

______ (1919). The Philosophy of Logical Atomism (III-IV). The Monist 29(1), 32-63.

RYSIEW, P. (2011). Surveys, Intuitions, Knowledge Attributions: Comments on Keith DeRose’s “Contextualism, Contrastivism, and X-Phi Surveys”. Philosophical Studies 156, 111-120.

SCHAFFER, J. (2006). The Irrelevance of the Subject: Against Subject-Sensitive Invariantism. Philosophical Studies 127, 87-107.

SOSA, E. (1988). Knowledge in Context, Skepticism in Doubt: The Virtue of our Faculties. Philosophical Perspectives 2, 139-155.

STANLEY, J. (2005). Knowledge and Practical Interests. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ______ (2011). Know How. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

______ and WILLIAMSON, T. (2001). Knowing How. The Journal of Philosophy 98(8), 411-444.

TURRI, J. (2014). Epistemology: A Guide. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

VENTURINHA, N. (2010). A Re-Evaluation of the Philosophical Investigations, in N. Venturinha (ed.), Wittgenstein After His Nachlass. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 143- 156.

______ (2013). A Composite Work of Art, in N. Venturinha (ed.), The Textual Genesis of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. New York: Routledge, 1-16.

______ (2015). The Epistemic Value of Holding for True. Journal of Philosophical Research 40, 155-170.

______ (2018). Description of Situations. An Essay in Contextualist Epistemology. Cham: Springer.

______ (2019). Replies to Commentators. Philosophia, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-019-00153-w.

______ (2020a). Non-sceptical Infallibilism. Analysis 80(1), 86-95.

______ (2020b). Wittgenstein and the Method of von Wright’s Varieties of Goodness. Philosophical Investigations 43(4), 334-345.

______ (forthcoming a). Context-Sensitive Objectivism: Going Deeper into Description of Situations. Logos & Episteme.

______ (forthcoming b). Replies to Critics. Logos & Episteme.

______ (forthcoming c). Glauben/Wissen, in S. Majetschak and A. Weiberg (eds.), Wittgenstein-Handbuch. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.

WILLIAMS, M. (1988). Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Scepticism. Mind 97(387), 415-439.

______ (2018). Wittgenstein and Skepticism: Illusory Doubts, in D. E. Machuca and B. Reed (eds.), Skepticism: From Antiquity to the Present. London: Bloomsbury, 481-505.

______ (2019a). Beyond Unnatural Doubts: Lessons from Wittgenstein, in E. Marchesan and D. Zapero (eds.), Context, Truth, and Objectivity: Essays on Radical Contextualism. New York: Routledge, 59-87.

______ (2019b). The Indispensability of Knowledge. Philosophia, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-019-00139-8.

WILLIAMSON, T. (2000). Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

______ (2001). Comments on Michael Williams’ “Contextualism, Externalism and Epistemic Standards”. Philosophical Studies 103, 25-33.

______ (2005a). Knowledge and Scepticism, in F. Dretske and M. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 681-700.

______ (2005b). Contextualism, Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and Knowledge of Knowledge. The Philosophical Quarterly 55(219), 213-235.

WILSON, I. R. G. (2012). Lunar Tides and the LongTerm Variation of the Peak Latitude Anomaly of the Summer Sub-Tropical High Pressure Ridge over Eastern Australia. The Open Atmospheric Science Journal 6, 49-60.

______ and SIDORENKOV, N. S. (2013). Long-Term Lunar Atmospheric Tides in the Southern Hemisphere. The Open Atmospheric Science Journal 7, 51-76.

WITTGENSTEIN, L. (1961). Tractatus LogicoPhilosophicus, tr. D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

______ (1965). Lecture on Ethics. Philosophical Review 74(1), 3-12.

______ (1974). On Certainty, rev. edn, ed. G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright, tr. Denis Paul and G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.

______ (2009). Philosophical Investigations, ed. P. M. S. Hacker and J. Schulte, tr. G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker and J. Schulte. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

______ and WAISMANN, F. (2003). The Voices of Wittgenstein: The Vienna Circle, ed. G. Baker, tr. G. Baker, M. Mackert, J. Connolly and V. Politis. London: Routledge.

WRIGHT, C. (1985). Facts and Certainty. Proceedings of the British Academy 71, 429-472.

______ (2005). Contextualism and Scepticism: EvenHandedness, Factivity and Surreptitiously Raising Standards. The Philosophical Quarterly 55(219), 236-262.

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2020 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.