An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv

Autores

Palavras-chave:

Transcendental, Idealismo, Lógica, Sintético e analítico, Kant

Resumo

This paper presents an elucidation of Kant’s notion of judgment, which clearly is a central challenge to the understanding of the Critic of Pure Reason, as well as of the Transcendental Idealism. In contrast to contemporary interpretation, but taking it as starting point, the following theses will be endorsed here: i) the synthesis of judgment expresses a conceptual relation understood as subordination in traditional Aristotelian logical scheme; ii) the logical form of judgment does not comprise intuitions (or singular representations); iii) the relation to intuition is not a judgment concern; iv) the response to the question about the ‘x’ that grounds the conceptual relation in judgments must be sought in transcendental aspects: 1) on construction in pure form of intuition, 2) in experience and 3) in the requirements to experience, respectively to mathematical, empirical, and philosophical judgments. The overall purpose is to build up an understanding of judgment that supports a latter assessment of Kant’s theoretical philosophy.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Evandro C. Godoy, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Sul-Rio-Grandense

Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Sul-Rio-Grandense - IFSUL.

Referências

KANT I. Gesammelte Schriften Hrsg.: Bd. 1–22 Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Bd. 23 Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, ab Bd. 24 Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Berlin, 1900ff.

KANT I. Critique of pure reason. Ed. e trad. Paul Guyer e Allen W. Wood. The Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

KANT I. The Jäsche Logic. In: YOUNG, Michael (Ed. e Trad.). Lectures on Logic. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge Universtity Press, 1992. p. 517-640.

ALLISON H. E. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism. Yale University, 2004. ANGELELLI I. “Predication Theory: Classical and Modern”. In Hochberg H. and Mulligan K. (Editors.), Relations and predicates. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag. 2004, p. 55-80.

ARISTOTLE. The Categories. On Interpretation. Prior Analytics. Trans. Cooke and Tredinnick. Cambridge/Massachusetts: Loeb/ Harvard University Press/ London: Heinemann, 1962.

ARNAULD A. and NICOLE P. [1662] La Logique ou L’art de Penser. Paris: Gallimard, 1992.

BEISER, Frederick. “Kant’s Intellectual Development: 1746-1781”. In: GUYER, Paul. The Cambridge Companion to Kant. 1992, p. 26-61.

BRANDT R. The Table of Judgments: Critique of Pure Reason A 67-76; B 92-101. Atascadero: Ridgeview, 1995.

CHURCH A. “The History of the Question of Existential Import of Categorical Propositions.” In: BAR HILLEL, Y. Org. Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1965, p. 417-24.

HANNA, Robert, "Kant’s Theory of Judgment", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL : https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entri es/kant-judgment/. Acessed in: 08/11/2020.

LEIBNIZ G. W. [1765] Nouveaux Essais sur l‘Entendement Humain. In: JANET, Paul. OEuvres Philosophiques de Leibniz. v. 1. Paris: Ancienne Librairie Germer Balillière, 1900, p. 13-498.

LEIBNIZ, G. W. New Essays concerning Human Understanding. Trans. Alfred Gideon Langley. London: Macmillan, 1896.

LONGUENESSE B. Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Charles T. Wolfe. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.

PARIENTE J. C. L’analyse du Langage à Port-Royal. Paris: Minuit, 1985.

SCHULTHESS P. Relation und Funktion: eine systematische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung zur theoretischen Philosophie Kants. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1981.

SHABEL, L., Kant's Philosophy of Mathematics, In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), 2013. Available in: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entri es/kant-mathematics/. Accessed in: June 2019.

STRAWSON P. F. The bounds of sense. London: Routledge, 1999.

WILKS, Ian. “Peter Abelard and His Contemporaries”. In: Woods, John and Gabbay, Dov M. (Eds.) Handbook of the History of Logic. Medieval and Renaissance Logic, v.2, Amsterdam, (2008), pp. 83-156.

Downloads

Publicado

2021-05-15

Como Citar

Godoy, E. C. . (2021). An intensional view of judgment in Kant’s Krv. Manuscrito: Revista Internacional De Filosofia, 44(1), 131–148. Recuperado de https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8665652

Edição

Seção

Artigos