Palavras-chave
Ação coletiva
Intenção comunicativa
Como Citar
Resumo
Recent approaches to the analysis of dialogue processing have assumed that its struture has to be defined in terms of its orientation towards a goal. We think that, on the contrary, this perspective prevents us from grasping what is essential in dialogue as action, namely, its collective nature. For this reason, in this paper we begin by analyzing the idea of collective action, which we then apply to the study of dialogue, making a sharp distinction between communicative intention and intention to engage in dialogue.
Referências
Airenti, G., B. G. Bara and M.Colombetti (1993). Conversation and Behavior Games in the Pragmatics of Diologue. Cognitive Science, 17, pp. 197-256.
Apostel, L. (1981). Semantics and Syntax of Action Theory. Manuscrito, Vol. IV, nº 2, pp. 133-158.
Arrow, K. J. (1963). Social Choice and Individual Values. 2nd edition (New Haven, Yale University Press).
Arrow, K. J. (1996). Preface. In: K.J. Arrow, E. Colombatto, M. Perlman and C. Schmidt (eds.) The Rational Foundamtions of Economic Behaviour (London, MacMillan).
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Second edition, edited by J.O. Urmson and M. Sbisà (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
Bach, K. (1987). On Communicative Intentions: A reply to Récanati. Mind Language, 2, pp. 141-154.
Blackburn, S. (1984). Spreading the Word (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
Bratman, M.E. (1992). Shared Cooperative Activity. The Philosophical Review, 101 (2), pp. 327-341.
Carberry, S. (1990). Plan Recognition in Natural Language Dialogue (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press).
Clark, H.H. and E.F. Schaefer (1989). Contributing to Discourse. Cognitive Science, 13. pp. 259-294.
Dascal, M. and Idan (1989). From individual to collective action. In: F, Vandamme and R. Pinxten (eds.). The Philosophy of Leo Apostel: Descriptive and Critical Essays (Ghent, Plenum), pp. 133-148.
Fotion, N. (1971). Master speech acts. Philosophical Quarterly, 21:84, pp. 232-43.
Gilbert M. (1989). On Social Facts (Princeton, Princeton University Press).
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk (Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press).
Goldman, A. I. (1970), A Theory of Human Action (Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press).
Grice, H.P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 66, pp. 377-388. Reprinted in H.P. Grice, (1989), pp. 213-223.
Grice, H.P. (1967). Logic and Conversation. In: P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.). Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3: Speech Acts. (New York, Academic Press), 1975, pp. 41-58, Reprinted in H. P. Grice (1989), pp. 22-40.
Grice, H.P. (1969). Uttere’s Meaning and Intentions. Philosophical Review, 78, pp. 147-177. Reprinted in H. P. Grice, (1989), PP. 86-116.
Grice, H.P. (1968), Uttere’s Meaning, Sentence-meaning, and Word-Meaning. Foundations of Laguage, 4, pp. 1-18. Reprinted in H.P.Grice, (1989), pp. 117-137.
Grice, H.P. (1989) Studies in the way of Works (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press).
Grosz B.J and C.L. Sidner (1986). Attention, Intentions and the Struture od Discourse, Computacional Linguistics 12, pp. 175-204.
Grosz, B.J. and Kraus (1996). Collaborative Plans for Complex Group Action. Artificial intelligence, 86, pp. 269-357.
Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse Strategies (Cambriedge, Cambriedge University Press).
Harman, G. (1986). Change in View: Principles of Reasoning (Cambriedge, Mass., MIT Press).
Korta, K. (1996). Hacia um Modelo del Diálogo: Intención Acción Comunicación (Leioa, Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco).
Korta, K. (1997). Mental States in Conversation. Linguistics and Philosophy (submitted).
Lewis, D. (1969). Convetion: A philosophical study (Cambridge, Mass. , Harvard University Press).
Récanati, F. (1986). On definig Communicative Intentions, Mind and language, 1, pp. 213-242.
Sacks, H., E. A. Shegloff and G.Jefferson (1974). A Simplest Systematics for The Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50 pp. 696-735.
Schegloff, E. A. and H. Sacks (1973). Opening Up Closings. Semiotica, 8, pp. 289-327.
Schiffer, S. (1972). Meaning (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to Discourse (Oxford, Blackwell).
Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Searle, J. (1990). Collective Intentions and Actions. In: P.R. Cohen, J. Morgan and M. E. Pollack, Intentions in Communication (Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press), pp. 401-415.
Searle, J. (1992). Conversation. In: J. Serle et al., (On) Searle on Conversation (Amsterdam, John Benjamins), pp. 7-29.
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition (Oxford, Blackwell).
Strawson, P. F. (1964). Intention and Convention in Speech Acts. Philosophical Review, 73, pp. 439-60.
Tuomela, R. (1991a). Intentional Single and Joint Action, Philosophical Studies, 62, pp. 235-262.
Tuomela, R. (1991b). We Will Do It: An Analysis of Group Intentions, Philosophy and Phenomenological Reseach, 51, pp. 249- 277.
Tuomela, R. (1993). What is cooperation? Erkenntnis, 38, pp. 87-101.
Tuomela, R. (1995). The Importance of Us (Stanford, Stanford University Press).
Tuomela, R and K. Miller (1988). We-intentions. Philosophical Studies, 53, pp. 367-389.
Ullmann-Margalit, E. (1983). On Presumption. The Journal of Philosophy, 80, pp. 143-163.
Vanderveken, D. (1990). Meaning and Speech acts, Vol. I, Principles of Language Use (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Vanderveken, D. (1991). Meaning and Speech acts, Vol, II, Formal Semantics of Success and Satisfaction (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Van Dijk, T.A. (1977). Text and contexto: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse (London, Longmans).
Van Dijk, T.A. (1985). Handbook of Discourse Analysis.
Walton, D. N. (1993). The speech act of pressumption. Pragmatics and Cognition, 1, pp. 125-148.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 1998 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia
Downloads
