What’s voluntary in stance voluntarism?

Autores

Palavras-chave:

Voluntarismo de postura, Postura empírica, Van Fraassen, Revoluções científicas, Involuntarismo doxástico

Resumo

Stance voluntarism highlights the role of the will in epistemic agency, claiming that agents can control the epistemic stances they assume in forming beliefs. It claims that radical belief changes are not compelled by the evidence; they are rationally permitted choices about which epistemic stances to adopt. However, terms like “will”, “choice”, and “stance” play a crucial role while being left as vague notions. This paper investigates what kind of control rational agents can have over epistemic stances. I argue that whether epistemic stances are voluntary depends on what kind of stance is being assessed. Sometimes epistemic stances are taken to be evaluative attitudes about how to produce knowledge. This kind of stance is not directly controllable, since it is essentially connected to beliefs, and believing is not voluntary. But sometimes epistemic stances are taken to be styles of reasoning and modes of engagement, expressing ways of approaching the world in order to produce knowledge, which can be voluntary. Overall, this supports a formulation of stance voluntarism as a dual-systems theory of epistemic agency, where epistemic rationality is compounded by a dynamic interplay between involuntary processes of belief formation and voluntary processes of cognitive guidance.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Bruno Malavolta e Silva, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Doutorado em Filosofia pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

Referências

ALSPECTOR-KELLY, M. “Constructive Empiricism Revisited” Review of P. Dicken. Metascience, [s. l.], v. 21, p. 187-191, 2012.

BAUMANN, P. "Empiricism, Stances, and The Problem of Voluntarism". Synthese, [s. l.], v. 178, n. 1, p. 27-36, 2011.

BOUCHER, S. "Stances and Epistemology. Metaphilosophy", [s. l.], v. 49, n. 4, 2018.

BOUCHER, S. "What is a philosophical stance? Paradigms, policies and perspectives". Synthese, [s. l.], v. 191, n. 10, p. 2315-2332, 2014.

BOZZO, A. P. "On What Empiricism Cannot Be". Metaphilosophy, [s. l.], v. 47, n. 2, 2016.

CHAKRAVARTTY, A. "A Puzzle About Voluntarism About Rational Epistemic Stances". Synthese, [s. l.], v. 178, n. 37, p. 37-48, 2011.

CHAKRAVARTTY, A. "Suspension of Belief and Epistemologies of Science". International Journey for the Study of Skepticism, [s. l.], v. 5, p. 168-192, 2015.

CHAKRAVARTTY, A. "Scientific Realism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2017a.

CHAKRAVARTTY, A. Scientific Ontology: Integrating Naturalized Metaphysics and Voluntarist Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017b.

CHURCHLAND, P. M.; HOOKER, C. A. (Eds.). Images of Science. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1985.

CROMBIE, A. C. Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Tradition. Michigan: Duckworth, 1994.

DEVITT, M. "Are unconceived alternatives a problem for scientific realism?" Jounal for General Philosophy of Science, [s. l.], v. 42, p. 285-293, 2011.

DICKEN, P. Constructive Empiricism: Epistemology and The Philosophy of Science. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

DIEKS et al. (Eds.). Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation. The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective, vol 2. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011.

ELDER, J. "Defending stance voluntarism". Philosophical Studies, [s. l.], v. 176, n. 11, p. 3019-3039, 2019.

ENGEL, P. "Volitionism and Voluntarism about Belief". In A. Meijers (Ed.) (1999), pp. 9-25.

FAHRBACH, L. "Scientific revolutions and the explosion of scientific evidence". Synthese, [s. l.], v. 194, n. 12, p. 5039-5072, 2017.

FEYERABEND, P. Against Method. 3rd. ed. London & New York: Verso Books, 1993.

FINE, A. "The Natural Ontological Attitude". In J. Leplin (Ed.). (1984), pp. 83-109.

FINE, A. The Shaky Game. 2nd. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.

HIERONYMI, P. "The Wrong Kind of Reason". The Journal of Philosophy, [s. l.], v. 102, n. 9, p. 437-57, 2005.

HIERONYMI, P. "Believing at Will". Canadian Journal of Philosophy, [s. l.], v. 35, p. 149-187, 2009.

HO, D. "Farewell to Empiricism". In B. Monton. (Ed.). (2007), pp. 319-334.

JAUERNIG, A. "Must Empiricism Be a Stance, and Could it Be One? How to Be an Empiricist and a Philosopher at the Same Time". In B. Monton. (Ed.). (2007), pp. 271-318.

KAHNEMAN, D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. [s.l.] : Penguin Books, 2011.

KELLY, T. "The Rationality of Belief and some other Propositional Attitudes". Philosophical Studies, [s. l.], v. 110, p. 163-196, 2002.

KORNBLITH, H. On Reflection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

KUHN, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.

KUKLA, A. Studies in Scientific Realism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

LADYMAN, J. "Discussion: Empiricism versus Metaphysics". Philosophical Studies, [s. l.], v. 121, p. 133-145, 2004.

LADYMAN, J. "The Epistemology of Constructive Empiricism". In B. Monton. (Ed.). (2007), pp. 46-61.

LAUDAN, L. "A Confutation of Convergent Realism". Philosophy of Science, [s. l.], v. 48, n. 1, p. 19-49, 1981.

LEPLIN, J. (Ed.). Scientific Realism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.

LEVY, N.; MANDELBAUM, E. "The Powers that Bind: Doxastic Voluntarism and Epistemic Obligation". In J. Mason and R. Vitz (Eds.). (2014), pp. 15-32.

MAGNUS, P. D.; CALLENDER, C. "The Realist Ennui and the Base Rate Fallacy". Philosophy of Science, [s. l.], v. 71, p. 320-338, 2003.

MASON, J.; VITZ, R. (Eds.). The Ethics of Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

MEIJERS, A. (Ed.). Belief, Cognition and the Will. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press, 1999.

MOHLER, C. "The Dilemma of Empiricist Belief". In B. Monton. (Ed.) (2007), pp. 209-229.

MONTON, B. (Ed.). Images of Empiricism. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.

O’SHAUGHNESSY, B. The Will: A Dual Aspect Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.

OWENS, D. "Epistemic Akrasia". The Monist, [s. l.], v. 85, p. 381-397, 2002.

PSILLOS, S. Scientific Realism : How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge, 1999.

PSILLOS, S. "Putting a Bridle on Irrationality: An Appraisal of van Fraassen’s New Epistemology". In B. Monton. (Ed.). (2007), pp. 134-164.

PSILLOS, S. "The Scope and Limits of the No Miracles Argument". In D., Dieks et al.(eds.). (2011).

PUTNAM, H. "What is a Mathematical Truth". Cambridge. In: Mathematics, Matter and Method, Philosophical Papers, Vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.

REISNER, A. "Pragmatic Reasons for Belief". In D. Star (Ed.). (2018).

ROWBOTTOM, D. "Stances and paradigms: a reflection". Synthese, [s. l.], v. 178, n. 1, p. 111-119, 2011.

ROWBOTTOM, D.; BUENO, O. "How to change it: modes of engagement, rationality, and stance voluntarism". Synthese, [s. l.], v. 178, n. 1, p. 7-17, 2011.

ROWBOTTOM, D. "The Empirical Stance vs. The Critical Attitude". South African Journal of Philosophy, [s. l.], v. 24, n. 3, p. 200-223, 2005.

STAR, D. (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

SCHOENFIELD, M. "Permission to Believe: Why Permissivism is True and What It Tell Us About Irrelevant Influences on Belief". Noûs2, [s. l.], v. 48, p. 193-218, 2014.

STANFORD, P. K. Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

STEUP, M. "Empiricism, metaphysics, and voluntarism". Synthese, [s. l.], v. 178, n. 1, p. 19-26, 2011.

TELLER, P. "What is a Stance". Philosophical Studies, [s. l.], v. 121, p. 159-171, 2004.

TELLER, P. "Learning to live with voluntarism". Synthese, [s. l.], v. 178, n. 1, p. 49-66, 2011.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. Empiricism in thePhilosophy of Science . In P. Churchland and C. Hooker (Eds.). (1985).

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. "The False Hopes of Traditional Epistemology". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, [s. l.], v. 60, p. 253-80, 2000.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. "Constructive Empiricism Now". Philosophical Studies, [s. l.], v. 106, p. 151-170, 2001.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. The Empirical Stance. New Have & London: Yale University Press, 2002.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. "Précis of The Empirical Stance". Philosophical Studies, [s. l.], v. 121, p. 127-132, 2004. a.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. "Replis to Discussion of The Empirical Stance". Philosophical Issues, [s. l.], v. 121, p. 171-192, 2004. b.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. "From a View of Science to a New Empiricism". In B. Monton. (Ed.). (2007), pp. 337-384.

VAN FRAASSEN, B. C. "On stance and rationality". Synthese, [s. l.], v. 178, n. 1, p. 155-169, 2011.

VITZ, R. "Doxastic Voluntarism". The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2019.

WILLIAMS, B. "Deciding to Believe". In: Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers 1956-72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973, pp. 136-151.

WYLIE, A. "Arguments forScientific Realism : the Ascending Spiral". American Philosophical Quarterly, [s.l.], v. 23, p. 287-297, 1986.

Downloads

Publicado

2021-09-29

Como Citar

SILVA, B. M. e . What’s voluntary in stance voluntarism?. Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia, Campinas, SP, v. 44, n. 2, p. 52–88, 2021. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8667158. Acesso em: 4 out. 2022.

Edição

Seção

Artigos