Linguistic meanings meet linguistic form



Polysemy, Semantics, Pragmatics, Language, Duffley


In this paper I critically address some ideas presented in Patrick Duffley’s book Linguistic Meaning Meets Linguistic Form. Duffley adopts the semiological principle that linguistic signs have stable meanings. I argue that this principle leads Duffley to an artificial description of the meaning of the preposition for, in attempting to avoid the charge of polysemy. Another issue is that the principle is not consistently followed throughout the book, such as in Duffley’s analysis of the meaning of start, or in his acceptance of words with encyclopedic meanings. I also point out that the proposed meaning of start and the view that the meaning of some words is encyclopedic have problems of their own.


Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Raquel Krempel, University of São Paulo

PhD in Philosophy from the University of São Paulo.


Duffley, P. (2020). Linguistic Meaning Meets Linguistic Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fodor, J. A. (1987). Psychosemantics: The problem of meaning in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Fodor, J. A. (1998). Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Clarendon.

Portner, P. H. (2005). What Is Meaning? Oxford: Blackwell.

Riemer, N. (2010). Introducing Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vicente, A., & Falkum, I. (2017). “Polysemy”. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics.




Como Citar

KREMPEL, R. Linguistic meanings meet linguistic form. Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia, Campinas, SP, v. 45, n. 1, p. 28–42, 2022. Disponível em: Acesso em: 2 out. 2022.