Palavras-chave
Syntax
Semantics
Tough constructions
Como Citar
Resumo
The paper responds to Duffley's hypothesis that syntactic phenomena are explicable by the ways in which constructions are used. A model of explanation will be offered, and on this basis 'tough' constructions and the general counterfunctionality of syntax will be discussed.
Referências
Anderson, D. 2005: The acquisition of tough movement in English. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
Becker, M. 2014: The Acquisition of Syntactic Structure: Animacy and Thematic Alignment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, C. 1969: The Acquisition of Syntax in Children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 1977: Essays on Form and Interpretation. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Chomsky, N. 2000: New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
Collins, J. 2007: Syntax, more or less. Mind, 116: 805-850.
Collins, J. 2020: Linguistic Pragmatism and Weather Reporting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Duffley, P. 2020: Linguistic Meaning Meets Linguistic Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
Goldberg, A. 2006: Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
Sprouse, J. and Hornstein, N. (Eds.) 2013: Experimental Syntax and Island Effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia