Banner Portal
Dogwhistling as a narrative-evoking form of communication
PDF (English)

Palavras-chave

Dogwhistling
Intertextuality
Narrativity
Perlocutionary effect
Narrative-evoking effect

Como Citar

ORLANDO, Eleonora. Dogwhistling as a narrative-evoking form of communication. Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia, Campinas, SP, v. 46, n. 3, p. e20230022, 2023. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8675240. Acesso em: 27 abr. 2024.

Resumo

In this essay I defend the view that dogwhistling is a a speech act performed with a narrative-evoking perlocutionary effect in the so-called target audience. What is evoked is a certain kind of narrative, previously endorsed by the relevant audience, which endows its members with the use of some linguistic expressions (and some non-linguistic representations) with non-conventional, derived meanings. In the dogwhistling scenarios, those derived meanings are recovered and put to work by means of different mechanisms, which has an impact on the emotional and practical attitudes of the target audience. The covert message is thus inferred as the product of the recovered meanings at work and their emotional and practical impacts on the audience in the new contexts of use, which determines a new pragmatic meaning dimension for the expressions in play. Although the phenomenon has been frequently analyzed in connection with examples of political discourse, it is common to cinematographic and literary intertextual references, and, more generally, to all those occasions in which communication relies on the narrative dependance of linguistic use.

PDF (English)

Referências

Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words? Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. The original is from 1929 (Leningrad) and 1963 (Moscow).

Bakhtin, M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin, ed. Michael Holquist, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin and London: University of Texas Press.

Barthes, Roland. 1957. Mythologies. New York: Hill and Wang, 1972.

Borges, Jorge Luis. 1944. Theme of the Traitor and Hero. In Ficciones, Part II: Artifices, translated by Anthony Kerrigan. New York: Grove Press, 1962.

Borges, J. L. 1964. “Adam Cast Forth”. In El oro de los tigres. Buenos Aires: Emece Editores, 1972. Translated into English by Genia Gurarie https://allpoetry.com/Adam-Cast-Forth

Doggett, T. and Egan, A. 2007. “Wanting things you don’t want: the case for an imaginative analogue of desire”, Philosophers Imprint 7: 1-17.

Friend, Stacie. 2003. “How I really feel about JFK”. In M. Kieran and D. Lopes (eds.) Imagination, Philosophy and the Arts. London: Routledge.

García-Carpintero, Manuel and Marques, Teresa. 2020. “Really expressive presuppositions and how to block them”, Grazer Philosophische Studien 97: 138-158.

Ginzburg, Natalia. 1963. Lessico famigliare. Roma: Einaudi Editore. Translated into English by Jenny McPhee. New York: Review Books Classics, 2017. The references in the text are to the original Italian version.

Grice, H. Paul. 1957. “Meaning”, Philosophical Review, 66(3): 377-388. Reprinted as ch. 14 of Studies in the way of words (213-233). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation”. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3 (22-40). Cambridge: Academic Press.

Gutzmann, Daniel. 2015. Use-Conditional Meaning. Studies in Multidimensional Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Henderson, R., & McCready, E. 2019. “Dogwhistles and the at-issue/non-at-issue distinction”. In Gutzmann, D., Turgay, K. (eds.) Secondary content, current research in the semantics/pragmatics interface, vol 37. Leiden: Brill (222-24). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004393127_010

Khoo, J. 2017. “Code words and political discourse”, Philosophical Topics 45(2): 33-64. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics201745213

Kristeva, Julia. 1967. “Word, dialogue and novel”. In Léon Roudiez (ed.), Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art (64-91), translated by Alice Jardine, Thomas Gora and Léon Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press, London: Basil Blackwell, 1980. First published in Sémeiotikè as "Bakhtine, le mot, le dialogue et le roman" (143-73).

Lo Guercio, Nicolás and Caso, Ramiro. 2022. “An account of overt intentional dogwhistling”, Synthese 200:203: 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03511-6

Marques, Teresa. 2022. “The expression of hate in hate speech”, Journal of Applied Philosophy 10: 1-29.

Portner, Paul. 2004. “The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types”. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 14, in K. Watanabe and R. B. Young (eds.) (235-252). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications, Cornell University Linguistics Department.

Potts, Christopher. 2003. “Expressive content as conventional implicature”. In Makoto K, Shigeto K (eds.) Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 33 (303-322). Amherst: GLSA.

Potts, C. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Predelli, Stefano. 2013. Meaning without Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Saul, J. 2018. “Dogwhistles, political manipulation, and philosophy of language”. In Fogal et al. (2018) (360-383). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198738831.003.0013

Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stalnaker, Robert. 1978. Context and Content: Essays on Intentionality in Speech and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Strawson, Peter. 1964. “Intention and convention in speech acts”, The Philosophical Review 73(4): 439-460.

Walton, Kendall. 1990. Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Witten, Kimberly. 2008. “Dogwhistle politics: the new pitch of an old narrative”. Manuscript originally written and submitted for the Spring 2008 semester at San Francisco State University Courses: Narrative & Discourse Analysis, Professor & Advisor: Dr. Troi Carleton.

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.