Abstract
This is a critical notice of Mario Gómez-Torrente's novel account of demonstrative reference presented in chapter 2 of the recently published book Roads to Reference. After presenting the main tenets of his view (including the existence of a multitude of cases where demonstrative reference is indeterminate), I go on to critically examine a couple of its features. In section 2, I assess Gómez-Torrente’s assumption that demonstrative thought based on perception is less likely to succumb to indeterminacy than the others. I show that this aspect of his view invites unwelcome consequences regarding the transparency of thought. I do however suggest that this problem could be overcome by individuating perceptual intentions dynamically. In section 3, I express a distinct worry regarding a case, introduced en passant by Gómez-Torrente, that involves successful demonstrative reference regardless of its utterer's conflicting intentions, a result that seems to contradict his general theory. Instead of conceiving the case as exceptional, I use it to motivate the necessity of distinguishing between a subject’s referential intentions and a subject’s merely collateral beliefs about the target of his utterance.
References
Gomez-Torrente, Mario (2019). Roads to Reference. An Essay on Reference Fixing in Natural Language. Oxford, United
Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Siegel, Susanna (2002). ‘The role of perception in demonstrative reference’. Philosophers' Imprint 2:1-21.
Recanati, François (2016). Mental Files in Flux. Oxford University Press.
Recanati, François (forthcoming). ‘Transparent Coreference’. Topoi.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2020 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia