Keywords
Scientific properties
Arbitrariness
Determinacy profiles
Context
How to Cite
Abstract
This is a comment on Gómez-Torrente’s approach to natural kinds and natural kind terms. Here I will focus on his concerns related to the arbitrariness argument and his attempt to formulate a reply to it that maintains most (if not all) of the “Kripke-Putnam orthodoxy” when it comes to the reference-fixing of such terms. Gómez-Torrente concludes that ordinary kind terms have distinct referents from scientific terms. I will challenge one of the premises that he employs in reaching this conclusion: namely, that the difference in determinacy profiles between ordinary natural kinds and scientific kinds is enough to assume that the terms referring to them do not share their referents. I also suggest that some kind of contextual interpretation of natural kind terms might provide a nice explanation of those determinacy variations.
References
CHOMSKY, N. (2000), New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. GELMAN, S.A. (2003), The Essential Child. New York: Oxford University Press.
_______. & COLEY, J.D. (1990) “The importance of knowing a dodo is a bird: Categories and inferences in 2-year-old children”. Developmental psychology 26, pp. 796-804.
GÓMEZ-TORRENTE, M. (2019), Roads to Reference. An Essay on Reference Fixing in Natural Language. Oxford, Reino Unido: Oxford University Press.
GRAHAM, S.A., KILBREATH, C.S. & WELDER, A.N. (2001), “Words and Shape Similarity Guide 13- month-olds’ Inferences about Nonobvious Object Properties”. In J.D. Moore and K. Stenning (Eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Erlbaum. Hillsdale. pp. 352- 357.
KRIPKE, S. (1980), Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. LESLIE, S.J. (2007), “Generics and the Structure of Mind”. Philosophical Perspectives 21, pp.375-403, 2007.
_______. (2013), “Essence and Natural Kinds: When Science Meets Preschooler Intuition”. Oxford Studies in Epistemology 4, pp. 108-166.
ROEPER, T. STRAUSS, U. & PEARSON, B.Z. (2006), “The acquisition path of the determiner quantifier every: Two kinds of spreading”. In Current Issues in First Language Acquisition, University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 34, pp. 97-129.
SALMON, N.U. (2005), Reference & Essence. New York: Prometheus Books, 2005.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2020 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia
Downloads
