Keywords
Razão
How to Cite
Abstract
Objetivo deste artigo é analisar um aspecto particular da crítica humeana à ideia moderna ou cartesiana de “razão”. Procura-se detectar qual é a tese filosófica pressuposta por essa crítica e discutir o seu significado teórico no interior do “empirismo” de Hume.
References
Alféri, P. (1989). Guillaume D’Ockam – Le Singulier. (Paris, Minuit).
Aristóteles, Segundos Analíticos. (s.d)
Ayer, A.J. (1959). Editor’s introduction, in A.J. Ayer (ed.) Logical Positivism (New York, The Free Press).
Descartes, R. (1963a). Les Régles pour la Direction de L’Espirit, in Oeuvres Philosophiques (Paris, Garnier).
Descartes, R. (1963b). Les Principes de la Philosophie in Oeuvres Philosophiques (Paris, Garnier).
Gueroult, M. (1968). Descartes selon l’ordre des raisons. (Paris, Aubier).
Gueroult, M. (1970). “Physique et métaphysique de la force chez Descartes et chez Malebranche, in etudes sur Descartes, Spinoza, Malebranche et Leibniz. (Hildesheim, Georg Olms).
Husseri, E. (1956). Erste Philosophie I, Husserliana Vol. VII (Haia, Martinus Nijhoff).
Kant, I. (1968). Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaflen in Kants Werke, Akademie Ausgabe Vol. IV (Berlin, Walter de Gruyter & Co.).
Leibniz, (1972a). “Correspondance avec Arnauld”, in Oeuvres. (Paris, Aubier).
Leibniz, (1972b). Discours de Metaphysique in Oeuvres (Paris, Albier).
Leibniz, (1992). “Verdades Necessarias y Contigentes”, in Escritos Filosoficos ed. Ezequiel de Olaso. (Buenos Aires, Ed. Charcas).
Locke, J. (1963). Mr. Locke’s Reply to the Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of Worcester’s Answer to His Letter, in The Works of John Locke, Vol. IV, [originally published 1823] (Aalen, Scientia Verlag).
Locke, J. (1975). Na Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. P.H. Nidditch. (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
Michaud, Y. (1983). Hume et la Fin de la Philosophie . (Paris, PUF).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 1997 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia
Downloads
