Keywords
Lógica
Argumento
How to Cite
Abstract
A defense of a certain casea kind of ad hominem arguments is proposed here. It is shown that, in certain cases, considering the personal característica of the proponente of na argument is relevant for the assessment of its objective truth-content.
Contemporary formal logic’ – both classical and non-classical – inability to provide na adequate account of all aspects of the validity of argumentation is criticized, taking as an illustration the problem of the so-called “ad hominem fallacies”.
References
Anderson, A.R. and N.D. Belnap, Jr. (1975). Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol. 1. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cabrera, J. (1987). A Lógica Condenada. Uma Abordagem Extemporânea de Filosofia da Lógica. São Paulo: Hucitec/Edusp.
Cohen, M and E. Nagel. (1972) An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method. London. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Copi, I. (1972) Introduction to Logic. 4th ed. New York: Macmillan.
Da Costa, N.C.A. (1982). The philosophical importo f paraconsistent logic. Journal of Non-Classical Logic 1(1): 1-19.
Hamblin, C.L. (1970). Fallacies. London: Methuen.
Kupperman, J. and A. McGrade (1966). Fundamentals of Logic. New York: Doubleday.
McCawley, J. (1972). A program for Logic. In G. Harman and D. Davidson (eds.), Semantics for Natural Languages. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 498-544.
Michalos, A. (1970). Improving Your Reasoning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pretice Hall.
Orayen, R. (1989). Lógica, Significado y Ontología. México: UNAM.
Popper, K. (1978). A Lógica das Ciências Sociais. Brasília: UNB.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 1992 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia
Downloads
