Abstract
In a recent paper, Jc Beall and A. J. Cotnoir proposed a bi-modal solution to the fundamental problem of Christology - the problem of reconciling the apparent contradiction implied by Christ’s divine and human natures. According to their solution, the contradiction could be resolved if one takes Christ’s dual nature as implying two different theological modal notions: one ranging over divine possibilities and the other over human possibilities. As a riposte, I argue that as novel and ingenious as Beall and Cotnoir’s solution may be, it still fails to account for the very crux of the fundamental problem, viz., the true (modal) proposition about Christ being God-incarnate.
References
BEALL, Jc and COTNOIR, A. J. “Fully divine and fully human: a bi-modal outline towards consistency”. Religious Studies, 2020 (doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412520000360)
CROSS, R. “The Incarnation”. In T. P. Flint and M. C. Rea (eds.) (2011), pp. 452-475.
FLINT, T. P., REA, M. C. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia