Palavras-chave
Detachment
Contraposition
Como Citar
Resumo
Beall has given more or less convincing arguments to the effect that neither classical logic, nor K3, nor LP, nor S3 can play the role he expects from logic: to be the basement theory for all true theories, including true theology. However, he has not considered all the pertinent competitors, and he has not given any reassurance that he has not gone too low in the hierarchy of logics to find his desired “universal closure of all true theories”. In this paper, I put forward those additional arguments to show the superiority of FDE with respect to logics that include a detachable conditional but that are very much like FDE otherwise. I also discuss the problem that theological consequence might not contrapose even if theological consequence is supposed to extend FDE consequence and the latter does contrapose.
Referências
Anderson, A. R., and Belnap, N. D. Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Vol. I. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1975.
Arieli, O., and Avron, A. Reasoning with logical bilattices. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 5, 1 (1996), 25-63.
Beall, J. Multiple-conclusion LP and default classicality. Review of Symbolic Logic 4, 2 (2011), 326-336.
Beall, J. Free of Detachment: Logic, rationality, and gluts. Noûs 49, 2 (2015), 410-423.
Beall, J. There is no logical negation: true, false, both and neither. Australasian Journal of Logic 14, 1 (2017), 1-29.
Beall, J. The simple argument for subclassical logic. Philosophical Issues 28, 1 (2018), 30-54.
Beall, J. FDE as The One True Logic. In New Essays on Belnap-Dunn Logic, H. Omori and H. Wansing, Eds. Springer, Cham, 2019.
Beall, J. The Contradictory Christ. Oxford University Press, New York, 2021.
Beall, J., and Camrud, C. A note on FDE “all the way up”. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 61, 2 (2020), 283-296.
Cotnoir, A. J. Logical nihilism. In Pluralisms in Truth and Logic, J. Wyatt, N. J. L. L. Pedersen, and N. Kellen, Eds. Palgrave MacMillan, 2018, pp. 301-329.
Dicher, B. Requiem for logical nihilism, or: Logical nihilism annihilated. Synthese (2020), 1-24.
Estrada-González, L. On the meaning of connectives: Apropos of a non-necessitarianist challenge. Logica Universalis 5, 1 (2011), 115-126.
Estrada-González, L., and Ramírez- Cámara, E. Non-conditional contracting connectives. In Mathematics, Logics and their Philosophies. Essays in Honor of Mohammad Ardeshir, S. Rahman, M. Mojtahedi, and M. S. Zarepour, Eds. 2020, pp. 349-364.
Kremer, M. Kripke and the logic of truth. Journal of Philosophical Logic 17, 3 (1988), 225-278.
Mortensen, C. Anything is possible. Erkenntnis 30, 3 (1989), 319-337.
Pawl, T. Explosive theology: A reply to Jc Beall’s “Christ - a contradiction”. Journal of Analytic Theology 7, 1 (2019), 440-451.
Priest, G. An Introduction to Non-Classical Logics. From If to Is, second ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008.
Russell, G. An introduction to logical nihilism. In Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science-Proceedings of the 15th International Congress (2017), College Publications, pp. 125-135.
Russell, G. Logical nihilism: Could there be no logic? Philosophical Issues 28, 1 (2018), 308-324.
Shramko, Y., and Wansing, H. Truth and Falsehood: An Inquiry into Generalized Logical Values. Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, 2011.
Sylvan, R. On interpreting truth tables and relevant truth table logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 33, 2 (1992), 207-215.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia
Downloads
