Abstract
I argue that an ontological pluralist strategy that relies on category-relative properties is immune to all the particular criticisms Beall wields in his book against other strategies for recovering the consistency of the immutability of the incarnated god.
References
Beall, J.C. (2021) The Contradictory Christ, Oxford University Press.
Freund, M.A. (2018) “Predication and sortal concepts”. Synthese: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-02030-7.
Grandy, R.E. & Freund, M.A. (2021) "Sortals", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.) URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/sortals/.
Pawl, T. (2018) Conciliar Christology and the Consistency of Divine Immutability with a Mutable, Incarnate God. Nova et Vetera, English Edition, 16(3): 913-937.
Tanner N. (1990) Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, Georgetown University Press.
Wasserman, R. (2018) "Material Constitution", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/material-constitution/.
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofia