Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
The paper presents a comparison of the theories of truth, and the solutions of the liar paradox, proposed by Thomas Bradwardine (c. 1290–1349), Jean Buridan (c. 1295–1358), and Alfred Tarski (1901–1983).Referências
BELLHOUSE, D.R. “De Vetula: A Medieval Manuscript Containing Probability Calculations”. International Statistical Review / Revue Internationale de Statistique 68, p. 123-136, 2000.
BLACK, M. Language and Philosophy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 1949.
BOYER, C. B. The History of the Calculus and Its Conceptual Development. New York: Hafner Publishing Company, Inc. Reprinted 1959. New York: Dover Publications, Inc, 1949.
GOLDSTEIN L. “Epimenides and Curry”. Analysis 46, p. 117-121, 1986.
GOLDSTEIN L. “Doubting Thomas: from Bradwardine back to Anon”. In Rahman, Tulenheimo and Genot (2008), p. 65-85, 2008.
GRANT, E. “Bradwardine and Galileo: Equality of Velocities in the Void”. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 2, p. 344-364, 1965.
LEFF, G. Bradwardine and the Pelagians. Cambridge & elsewhere: Cambridge University Press, 1957.
MILLER, D.W. Review of Rahman, Tulenheimo and Genot (2008). Philosophy 85, 3, p. 433-436, 2010.
MILLS, E. “Scheming and Lying”. In Rahman, Tulenheimo and Genot (2008), p. 113-128, 2008.
MOU, B. “The Enumerative Character of Tarski’s Definition of Truth and its General Character in a Tarskian System”. Synthese 126, 1/2, p. 91-122, 2001. PANACCIO, C. “Restrictionism: A Medieval Approach Revisited”. In Rahman, Tulenheimo and Genot (2008), p. 229-253, 2008.
QUINE, W. V. O. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”. The Philosophical Review 60, p. 20–43. Reprinted in W. V. O. Quine (1953), p. 20– 46. From A Logical Point of View. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1951.
RAHMAN, S., TULENHEIMO, T., & GENOT, E., editors. Unity, Truth and the Liar: The Modern Relevance of Medieval Solutions to the Liar Paradox. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2008.
READ, S. L. “The Truth Schema and the Liar”. In Rahman, Tulenheimo and Genot (2008), p. 3-17, 2008a.
READ, S. L. “Further Thoughts on Tarski’s T-scheme and the Liar”. In Rahman, Tulenheimo and Genot (2008), p. 205-225, 2008b.
READ, S. L. Thomas Bradwardine, “Insolubilia”. Leuven: Peeters, 2010.
RESTALL, G. “Models for Liars in Bradwardine’s Theory of Truth”. In Rahman, Tulenheimo and Genot (2008), p. 135-147, 2008.
SANDU, G. “Read on the Liar”. In S. Pihlström, P. Raatikainen, & M. Sintonen, editors (2007), p. 129–140. Approaching Truth. Essays in Honour of Ilkka Niiniluoto. London: College Publications, 2007.
SPADE, P. V. “Insolubilia and Bradwardine’s Theory of Signification”. Medioevo: Revista di storia delle filosofia medievale 7, p. 115– 134. Reprinted as Chapter IV of P. V. Spade (1988). Lies, Language and Logic in the Late Middle Ages. London: Variorum Reprints, 1981.
TARSKI, A. “Grundzüge des Systemenkalkül”. Fundamenta Mathematicae 25, 4, p. 503–526, and 26, 2, p. 283-301, 1935-1936. References are to the English translation. “Foundations of the Calculus of Systems”, Chapter XII, p. 342–383, of Tarski (1956) . “The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, p. 341-375, 1944.
TARSKI, A. Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Translated by J. H. Woodger. 2nd edition 1983. Edited by J. Corcoran. Indianapolis IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1956.
WRIGHT, C. J. G. Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
Downloads
