Banner Portal
CRITICAL STUDY OF OSWALDO CHATEAUBRIAND’S LOGICAL FORMS I CLE, UNICAMP, CAMPINAS, BRASIL 2001, 442pp., AND LOGICAL FORMS II, UNICAMP, CAMPINAS, BRASIL 2005
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Palabras clave

Philosophy. Oswaldo Chateaubriand's Logical Forms

Cómo citar

HADDOCK, Guillermo E. Rosado. CRITICAL STUDY OF OSWALDO CHATEAUBRIAND’S LOGICAL FORMS I CLE, UNICAMP, CAMPINAS, BRASIL 2001, 442pp., AND LOGICAL FORMS II, UNICAMP, CAMPINAS, BRASIL 2005. Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía, Campinas, SP, v. 30, n. 1, p. 185–218, 2016. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8643515. Acesso em: 4 jul. 2024.

Resumen

In this critical study I try to highlight some of the most important issues discussed in Chateaubriand’s excellent book. In particular, I discuss in some detail Chateaubriand’s criticism of one of the icons of analytic philosophy, namely, Quine, as well as some of his own valuable contributions to philosophy in this book – for example, his refutation of the various forms of the slingshot argument and his characterization of logical truth.

 

PDF (Português (Brasil))

Citas

BARWISE, J., PERRY, J. “Semantic Innocence and Uncompromising Situations”. In: P. A. French et al. (eds.) (1981), pp. 387-403.

CARNAP, R. Der logische Aufbau der Welt 1928, fourth edition. Hamburg:

Meiner, 1974.

FØLLESDAL, D. “Gödel and Husserl”. In: J. Hintikka (ed.) (1995), pp. 427-446.

FRENCH, P. A. et al. (eds.). Midwest Studies in Philosophy. Vol. 6: The

Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota

Press, 1981.

HAUSER, K. “Gödel’s Program Revisited: Part I: The Turn to Phenomenology”. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 12, n. 4, pp. 529-

, December 2006.

HILL, C. O., ROSADO HADDOCK, G. E. Husserl or Frege?: Meaning,

Objectivity and Mathematics. Chicago: Open Court 2000. Paperback

edition, 2003.

HUSSERL, E. Philosophie der Arithmetik 1891, mit ergänzenden Texten

(1890-1901). Den Haag: M. Nijhoff, 1970.

————. Logische Untersuchungen 1900-1901. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff,

(I) and 1984 (II).

————. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und einer hänomenologischen Philosophie I, 1913. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff, 1976.

HINTIKKA, J. (ed.). From Dedekind to Gödel. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1995.

ROSADO HADDOCK, G. E. “On Necessity and Existence”. Diálogos,

, pp. 57-62, July 1996.

————. “Chateaubriand on Logical Forms and Semantics”. Manuscrito, XXVII, n. 1, pp. 115-128, 2004.

————. “Kritische Fußnoten zu Bernulf Kanitscheiders Naturalismus Aufsatz”. Erwägen, Wissen, Ethik, 17, n. 3, pp. 351-353, 2006.

————. The Young Carnaps Unknown Master, forthcoming.

TIESZEN, R. “Gödel’s Path from the Incompleteness Theorems (1931)

to Phenomenology (1961)”. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 4, n. 2, pp.

-203, June 1998.

VAN ATTEN, M., KENNEDY, J. “On the Philosophical Development of Kurt Gödel”. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 9, n. 4, pp. 425-476, December 2003.

WANG, H. From Mathematics to Philosophy. London: Routledge, 1974.

————. Reflections on Kurt Gödel. Cambridge: Mass., The MIT Press,

————. A Logical Journey: From Gödel to Philosophy. Cambridge,

Mass., The MIT Press, 1996.

WEIDEMANN, H. “Aussagesatz und Sachverhalt: ein Versuch zur Neubestimmung ihres Verhältnisses”. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 18, pp. 75-99, 1982.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.