Banner Portal
MORAL ‘SHOULD’S AND ‘MORALLY SHOULD’S, OR, RACHELS ON THE MORAL POINT OF VIEW
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Palabras clave

Rachels. Warnock. Moral judgments. Moral point of view. Moral-point-of-view theories.

Cómo citar

TRUEBLOOD, J. Jocelyn. MORAL ‘SHOULD’S AND ‘MORALLY SHOULD’S, OR, RACHELS ON THE MORAL POINT OF VIEW. Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía, Campinas, SP, v. 29, n. 1, p. 37–70, 2016. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/manuscrito/article/view/8643647. Acesso em: 18 jul. 2024.

Resumen

In 1972 James Rachels published a challenging criticism of moral-point-of-view theories. It has never been answered. This is surprising, given that the species of theory to which it applies remains alive. In this paper I reply to Rachels’ criticism. My reply refers frequently to the work of G. J. Warnock and employs three distinctions that have been overlooked in the literature on moral-point-of-view theories. These distinctions have relevance to more than Rachels’ paper. As shown in Section 6, they undermine a contemporary argument for moral subjectivism.
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Citas

ATTFIELD, R. Value, Obligation, and Meta-Ethics. Amsterdam: Rodopi,

BAIER, K. The Moral Point of View. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press,

______. “Comments”. In J. B. Schneewind (ed.) (1996), pp. 210-286.

BOWIE, N. (ed.). Ethical Theory in the Last Quarter of the Twentieth Century. Indianapolis: Hackett, pp. 39-79, 1983.

BRANDOM, R. “Points of View and Practical Reasoning”. Canadian

Journal of Philosophy, 12, pp. 321-333, 1982.

CARTER, C. L. (ed.). Skepticism and Moral Principles. Evanston, IL: New

University Press, 1973.

______. “Skepticism and Moral Theory in Contemporary Philosophy:

An Introductory Essay”. In C. L. Carter (ed.) (1973), pp. 1-42.

CASTAÑEDA, H. N., NAKHNIKIAN, G. (eds.). Morality and the Language

of Conduct. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1963.

CASTRO, F. R. “How Should We Understand the Project of the Moral

Point of View Theorists? Reply to Kai Nielsen”. Crítica, 32, pp. 103-114, 2004.

COOPER, N. The Diversity of Moral Thinking. Oxford: Clarendon, 1981.

FEIGL, H. “Validation and Vindication: An Analysis of the Nature and

the Limits of Ethical Arguments”. In W. Sellars and J. Hospers (eds.) (1952), pp. 667-680.

FOOT, P. “Morality and Art”. Proceedings of the British Academy, 56, pp.

-144, 1970.

______. “‘Is Morality a System of Hypothetical Imperatives?’ A Reply to

Mr. Holmes”. Analysis, 35, pp. 53-56, 1974.

FRANKENA, W. K. “Recent Conceptions of Morality”. In H. N. Castañeda and G. Nakhnikian (eds.) (1963), pp. 1-24.

______. “On Saying the Ethical Thing”. Proceedings and Addresses of the

American Philosophical Association, 39, 1966a. Repr. in K. E. Goodpaster

(ed.) (1976), pp. 107-124.

______. “The Concept of Morality”. Journal of Philosophy, 63, 1966b.

Repr. in K. E. Goodpaster (ed.) (1976), pp. 125-132.

______. “On Defining Moral Judgments, Principles, and Codes”. Etycka,

, 1973. Repr. in K. E. Goodpaster (ed.) (1976), pp. 184-192.

______. Thinking about Morality. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1980.

______. “Moral-Point-of-View Theories”. In N. Bowie (ed.) (1983), pp.

-79.

GOODPASTER, K. E. (ed.). Perspectives on Morality: Essays by William

Frankena. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1976.

GRIFFIN, J. Value Judgement: Improving our Ethical Beliefs. Oxford: Clarendon, 1996.

HARSANYI, J. C. “Morality and the Theory of Rational Behaviour”. In

A. Sen and B. Williams (eds.) (1982), pp. 39-62.

MACKIE, J. L. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977.

MILO, R. D. “Bentham’s Principle”. Ethics, 84, pp. 128-139, 1974.

______. Immorality. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.

______. “Scepticism and Moral Justification”. Monist, 76, pp. 379-393,

______. “Contractarian Constructivism”. In R. Shafer-Landau and T.

Cuneo (eds.) (2007), pp. 120-131.

NIELSEN, K. “Appraising Doing the Thing Done”. Journal of Philosophy,

, pp. 749-759, 1960.

______. “On Moral Truth”. In N. Rescher (ed.) (1968), pp. 9-25.

______. “Moral Point of View Theories”. Crítica, 31, pp. 105-116, 1999.

PITCHER, G. “Review of J. O. Urmson’s The Emotive Theory of Ethics”.

Philosophical Review, 79, pp. 586-592, 1970.

RACHELS, J. “Evaluating from a Point of View”. Journal of Value Inquiry,

, pp. 144-157, 1972.

RAZ, J. “On the Moral Point of View”. In J. B. Schneewind (ed.) (1966),

pp. 58-83.

RESCHER, N. (ed.). Studies in Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1968.

______. Moral Absolutes. New York: Peter Lang, 1989.

______. Objectivity. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997.

SCHNEEWIND, J. B. (ed.). Reason, Ethics, and Society: Themes from Kurt Baier, with His Responses. Chicago: Open Court, 1996.

SELLARS, W., HOSPERS, J. (eds.). Readings in Ethical Theory. New York:

Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1952.

SEN, A., WILLIAMS, B. (eds.). Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press, 1982.

SHAFER-LANDAU, R., CUNEO, T. (eds.). Foundations of Ethics. Oxford:

Blackwell, 2007.

SINGER, P. Writings on an Ethical Life. New York: Ecco, 2000.

TAYLOR, P. W. Normative Discourse. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall,

______. “On Taking the Moral Point of View”. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 3, pp. 35-61, 1978.

URMSON, J. O. The Emotive Theory of Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1968.

WALLER, B. “Noncognitivist Moral Realism”. Philosophia, 24, pp. 57-75,

WARNOCK, G. J. Contemporary Moral Philosophy. London: Macmillan,

______. The Object of Morality. London: Methuen, 1971.

WOLF, S. “Morality and the View from Here”. Journal of Ethics, 3, pp.

-223, 1999.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.