Palabras clave
Cómo citar
Resumen
In this paper we deal with two different approaches to logic, the Boolean and the Fregean. In particular, we give some reasons to explain certain ignorance of the Boolean approach at some Philosophy Departments, particularly in the teaching of logic. After giving some reasons for the convenience of combining both approaches, we recommend material on the Boolean approach to be included in the mentioned contexts.
Citas
BOOLE, G. The Mathematical Analysis of Logic. Reprinted. Oxford: Blackwell, 1948.
————. An Investigation of the Laws of Thought. Reprinted. New York:
Dover, 1951.
DOFFI, M., MORENO, A. Escritos Completos. Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 2002.
DUNN, J. M., HARDEGREE, G. M. Algebraic Methods in Philosophical Logic.
Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.
FREGE, G. Begriffsschrift, eine der aritmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache desreinen Denkens. Halle: Louis Nebert, 1879.
PUTNAM, H. “Peirce the Logician”. Historia Mathematica, 9, pp. 290-301,
QUINE, W. Methods of Logic. First edition. New York: Holt, 1950.
RAGGIO, A. “Processus Cognitifs Logiques”. In: M. Doffi, and A. Moreno
(eds.) (2002), pp. 287-292.
SCHRÖDER, E. Der Operationskreis des Logikkalküls. Leipzig, 1877.
Descargas
