Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
The aim of this paper is to frame briefly Chateaubriand’s conception of logical forms in the distinction between logic and language as calculus and logic as universal language, devised by Jean van Heijenoort and later generalized by Jaakko Hintikka. The most important reasons to connect Chateaubriand’s conception with this distinction are perhaps Chateaubriand’s criticism of the linguistic approach to logical forms and the role Chateaubriand assigns to symbolism in his own account.
Resumo:
O propósito deste artigo é localizar brevemente a concepção de forma lógica de Chateaubriand com relação à distinção entre lógica e linguagem como cálculo e lógica como linguagem universal, introduzida por Jean van Heijenoort e depois generalizada por Jaako Hintikka. Talvez a razão mais importante para conectar a concepção de Chateaubriand com esta distinção sejam suas críticas ao tratamento linguístico das formas lógicas, e o papel que Chateaubriand atribui ao simbolismo em seu próprio tratamento.
Palavras-chave: Chateaubriand. Cálculo e linguagem universal. Simbolismo lógico.
Referências
CHATEAUBRIAND, O. Logical Forms. Part I: Truth and Descriptions. Campinas: Unicamp, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência, 2001. (Coleção CLE, v. 34)
CHATEAUBRIAND, O. Logical Forms. Part II: Logic, Language, and Knowledge. Campinas: Unicamp, Centro de Lógica, Epistemologia e História da Ciência, 2005. (Coleção CLE, v. 42) FREGE, G. [1879]. Begriffsschrift. Halle: Louis Nebert. Repr. in I. Angelelli (ed). Gottlob Frege. Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsätze. Mit E. Husserls und H. Scholz’ Anmerkungen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1964. Engl. transl. in van Heijenoort 1967a, pp. 5-82 and in Frege 1972.
CHATEAUBRIAND, O. [1880/1881]. “Booles rechende Logik und die Begriffsschrift”. In: Frege 1969, pp.9-46.
CHATEAUBRIAND, O. [1883]. “Über den Zweck der Begriffsschrift”. In Angelelli 1964, pp. 97-106. Engl. transl. “On the Purpose of the Begriffsschrift” by V. H. Dudman in Australasian Journal of Philosophy 46 (1968), pp. 89-95, and “On The Aim of The Conceptual Notation” in Frege 1972.
CHATEAUBRIAND, O. Nachgelassene Schriften. In: G. Gabriel et al (eds.). Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1969.
CHATEAUBRIAND, O. Conceptual Notation and Related Articles. In: T.W. Bynum (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.
CHATEAUBRIAND, O. Posthumous Writings. Oxford: Blackwell. Engl. trans. by P. Long and R. White, 1979.
HINTIKKA, J. “On the Development of the Model-Theoretical Viewpoint in Logical Theory”. Synthese, 77, pp. 1-36, 1988.
VAN HEIJENOORT. “Logic as Calculus and Logic as Language”. Synthese 24, pp. 324-330, 1967. Repr. in van Heijenoort (1985), pp. 11-16.
VAN HEIJENOORT. [1979] “Absolutism and Relativism in Logic”. Repr. in van Heijenoort (1985), pp. 75-83.
VAN HEIJENOORT. Selected Essays. Naples: Bibliopolis, 1985.
Downloads
