Palavras-chave
mas faz”. Avaliação institucional. Confiança institucional. Corrupção
Como Citar
Resumo
O artigo investiga os perfis de cidadãos associados favoravelmente à ideia do “rouba, mas faz”, que significa concordância com a conduta de políticos que incorrem em atos de corrupção, mas que realizam um governo entendido como satisfatório. Utiliza-se como material empírico dois surveys de abrangência nacional, realizados em 2002 e 2006, e os principais resultados obtidos com as análises dos dados apontam para o forte rechaçamento da ideia de “rouba, mas faz” e para a importância explicativa de variáveis que indicam avaliação e desconfiança institucional.
Abstract:
The paper analyses the citizen’s profiles positively associated with the idea of “he steals, but get things done” that means agreement with the conduct of politicians who incur acts of corruption, but that performs a government perceived as satisfactory. It is used as empirical data two nationwide surveys, conducted in 2002 and 2006, and the main results of data´s analysis are the strong rejection of “he steals, but get things done” idea and distrust of representative actors and institutions.
Keywords: “he steals, but get things done”; institutional evaluations; institutional trust; corruption
Referências
AIDT, T. “Economic analysis of corruption: a survey”. The Economic Journal, vol. 113, nº 491, 2003.
ALDÉ, A. A construção da política: democracia, cidadania e meios de comunicação de massa. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV, 2004.
ALMEIDA, A. A cabeça do brasileiro. São Paulo: Record, 2007.
ANDERSON, C.; GUILLORY, C. “Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: a cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems”. The American Political Science Review, vol. 91, nº 1, 1997.
ANDERSON, C.; LOTEMPIO, A. “Winning, losing and political trust in America”. British Journal of Political Science, vol. 32, 2002.
CAPPELLA, J.; JAMIESON, K. Spiral of cynicism: the press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
CASTRO, M. “O comportamento eleitoral no Brasil: diagnóstico e interpretações”. Teoria e Sociedade, nº 1, 1997.
COSTELLO, A.; OSBORNE, J. “Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis”. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, vol. 10, nº 7, 2005.
CRONBACH, L. “Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests”. Psychometrika, vol. 16, nº 3, 1951.
DELLA-PORTA, D. Social capital, beliefs in government and political corruption. In: PHARR, S.; PUTNAM, R. (Eds.). Disaffected democracies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
DIAMOND, L.; MORLINO, L. “The quality of democracy: an overview”. Journal of Democracy, vol. 15, nº 3, 2004.
DIAMOND, L.; MORLINO, L. Assessing the Quality of Democracy: Theory and Empirical Analysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005.
DOIG, A.; MCIVOR, S. “Corruption and its control in the developmental context: an analysis and selective review of the literature”. Third World Quarterly, vol. 20, n° 3, 1999.
EASTON, D. A system analysis of political life. New York: Wiley, 1965.
FIALHO, F. M. “Vicissitudes de uma análise de survey à brasileira”. Resenha de ALMEIDA, A. C. A cabeça do brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro: Record, 2007. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, vol. 23, nº 66, 2008.
GOFFMAN, E. Frame analysis: an essay of the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1986.
HUNTINGTON, S. Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968.
HUNTINGTON, S. A terceira onda: a democratização no final do século XX. São Paulo: Ática, 1994.
INGLEHART, R. Culture shift in advanced societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
IYENGAR, S.; KINDER, D. News that matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.
KEY, V. Southern politics in state and nation. New York: Vintage Books, 1949.
KIM, J.; MUELLER, C. Factor analysis: statistical methods and practical issues. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1978.
KLITGAARD, R. Controlling Corruption. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1988.
LAZARSFELD, P.; BERELSON, B.; GAUDET, H. The People’s Choice: how to voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Columbia University Press, 1948.
LEYS, C. What are the problems about corruption? In: HEIDENHEIMER, A.; JOHNSTON, M.; LEVINE, V. (Eds.). Political corruption: a handbook. New Brunswick: Transaction, 1989.
MAURO, P. “Corruption and growth”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 110, n° 3, 1995.
MERTON, R. Social theory and social structures. New York: Free Press, 1957.
MESQUITA, N. C. “Mídia e democracia no Brasil: Jornal Nacional, Crise Política e Confiança nas Instituições”. São Paulo. Tese de Doutorado em Ciência Política. FFLCH-USP, 2008.
MOISÉS, J. A confiança e seus efeitos sobre as instituições democráticas. In: MOISÉS, J. (Org.). Democracia e confiança: por que os cidadãos desconfiam das instituições públicas? São Paulo: Edusp, 2010.
MOISÉS, J.; CARNEIRO, G. “Democracia, desconfiança política e insatisfação com o regime: o caso do Brasil”. Opinião Pública, vol. 14, nº 1, 2008.
MOISÉS, J. Democracia, desconfiança política e insatisfação com o regime: o caso do Brasil. In: MOISÉS, J. (Org.). Democracia e confiança: por que os cidadãos desconfiam das instituições públicas? São Paulo: Edusp, 2010.
NEWTON, K. “Mass media effects: mobilization or media malaise?” British Journal of Political Science, vol. 29, no 4, 1999.
NORRIS, P. “Does television erodes social capital? A reply to Putnam”. PS: Political Science & Politics, vol. 29, no 3, 1996.
NORRIS, P. Institutional explanation for political support. In: NORRIS, P. (Org.). Critical citizens: global support for democratic government. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
NORRIS, P. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Post-Industrial Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
NYE, J. “Corruption and political development: a cost-benefit analysis”. American Political Science Review, vol. 61, nº 2, 1967.
OFFE, C. How can we trust our fellow citizens? In: WARREN, M. (Org.). Democracy and trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
PATTERSON, T. Out of order. New York: Vintage Books, 1993.
PUTNAM, R. “Tuning in, Tuning out: the strange disappearance of social capital in America”. PS: Political Science & Politics, vol. 27, n o 4, 1995.
PUTNAM, R. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of american community. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2001.
RENNÓ, L. “Escândalos e voto: as eleições presidenciais de 2006”. Opinião Pública, vol.13, nº 2, 2007.
ROBINSON, M. “Public affairs television and the growth of political malaise: the case of 'The selling of pentagon'”. American Political Science Review, no 70, 1976.
ROSE-ACKERMAN, S. Corruption and government: causes, consequences and reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
SCHLEGEL, R. “Mídia, Confiança Política e Mobilização”. São Paulo. Dissertação de Mestrado em Ciência Política. FFLCHUSP, 2005.
SELIGSON, M. “The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: a comparative study of four Latin American countries”. Journal of Politics, vol. 64, nº 2, 2002.
SHLEIFER; A.; VISHNY, R. “Corruption”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 108, nº 3, 1993.
SHLEIFER; A.; VISHNY, R. “Stock market driven acquisitions”. Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 70, n° 3, 2003.
TULLOCK, G. “The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft”. Western Economic Journal, nº 5, 1967.
TVERSKY, A.; KAHNEMAN, D. “Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty”. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. 5, 1992.
WATERBURY, J. “Corruption, political stability and development: comparative evidence from Egypt and Morocco”. Government and Opposition, vol. 11, n° 4, 1976.
WINTERS, M.; WEITZ-SHAPIRO, R. “’Rouba, mas faz’ or not? Exploring voter attitudes toward corruption in Brazil”. Trabalho apresentado no Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington D.C, 2010.
WRAITH, R.; SIMPKINS, E. Corruption in Developing Countries. Londres: Allen and Unwin, 1963.
A Opinião Pública utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.
Downloads
