Banner Portal
Financiamento de campanha e apoio parlamentar à agenda legislativa da indústria na câmara dos deputados
PDF

Palavras-chave

Financiamento de campanha. Comportamento legislativo. Indústria. CNI

Como Citar

SANTOS, Manoel Leonardo; SILVA, Mariana Batista; FIGUEIREDO FILHO, Dalson Britto; ROCHA, Enivaldo Carvalho. Financiamento de campanha e apoio parlamentar à agenda legislativa da indústria na câmara dos deputados. Opinião Pública, Campinas, SP, v. 21, n. 1, p. 33–59, 2015. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/op/article/view/8641575. Acesso em: 19 abr. 2024.

Resumo

Qual é o efeito do financiamento de campanha sobre o comportamento do parlamentar? Este artigo analisa a votação dos deputados federais brasileiros (1999-2007) em relação aos projetos de interesse da Confederação Nacional da Indústria (CNI). Metodologicamente, o artigo combina estatística descritiva e multivariada para testar a hipótese de que quanto maior é o financiamento de campanha pela indústria, maior é a cooperação do parlamentar com os interesses desse setor. Foram utilizados análise de cluster e modelos de regressão logístico e de Poisson para estimar o efeito do financiamento de campanha sobre a cooperação do parlamentar com o setor da indústria. Os resultados confirmam parcialmente a hipótese. Não foi encontrada relação entre o financiamento da indústria e a cooperação dos parlamentares, mas confirma-se que a proporção de recursos corporativos influencia positivamente a cooperação dos parlamentares brasileiros com os interesses da CNI, controlando por diferentes variáveis. Esses resultados se alinham à literatura internacional sobre o tema, que encontra uma relação positiva entre contribuições de campanha e comportamento congressual.

 

Abstract:

What is the effect of campaign financing on the behavior of congressman? This article analyzes the vote of Brazilian federal deputies (1999-2007) in relation to the projects of interest to the National Confederation of Industry (CNI). Methodologically, the article combines descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis to test the hypothesis that, the higher the campaign financing by industry, greater parliamentary cooperation with the interests of this sector. We use cluster analysis, logistic regression models and Poisson to estimate the effect of campaign financing on cooperation. The results confirm the hypothesis partially. Relationship between industry funding and cooperation of parliamentarians was not found, but it is confirmed that the proportion of corporate resources influences positively the cooperation of Brazilian parliamentarians with the interests of the CNI, controlling by different variables. These results align to the international literature about the subject that finds a positive relationship between campaign contributions and Congressional behavior.

Keywords: campaign finance; legislative behavior; industry; National Confederation of Industry

PDF

Referências

ABLER, D. “Campaign contributions and house voting on sugar and dairy legislation”. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 73, p. 11-17, 1991.

ALDENDERFER, M. S.; BLASHFIELD, R. K. Cluster analysis. Sage University Paper Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Science, 1984.

BAIELY, K. D. "Cluster analysis". Sociological Methodology, vol. 6, p. 59-128, 1975.

BLALOCK, H. M. Measurement in the social sciences: theories and strategies. Chicago: Aldine, 1974.

BRONARS, S.; LOTT, J. JR. “Do campaign donations alter how a politician

votes? Or, do donors support candidates who value the same things that they do?”. Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 40, no 2, p. 317-350, 1997.

BUCHANAN, J.; TULLOCK, G. The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1962.

CARMINES, E. G.; ZELLER, R. A. Reliability and validity assessment. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1979.

CERVI, E. U. “Instituições democráticas e financiamento de campanhas no Brasil: análises das contribuições de pessoas físicas, jurídicas e partidos políticos às eleições de 2008 e o financiamento público exclusivo de campanha”. In: Anais do 33º Encontro Anual da Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais. Caxambu, MG, p. 1-30, 2009.

CHAPPELL, H. W. “Campaign contributions and voting on the cargo preference bill: a comparison of simultaneous models”. Public Choice, vol. 36, p. 301-312, 1981.

CHAPPELL, H. W. “Campaign contributions and congressional voting: a simultaneous probit-tobit model”. Review of Economics and

Statistics, vol. 61, p. 77-83, 1982.

CHOATE, P. Agents of influence: how Japan’s lobbyists in the United States manipulate America’s political and economic

system. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1990.

CLAWSON, D. Dollars and votes: how business campaign contributions subvert democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1999.

CONWAY, M. M. PACs in the political process. In: CIGLER, A. J.; LOOMIS, B. A. (eds.). Interest group politics. 3ª ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1991.

CORRADO, A., et al. The new campaign finance sourcebook. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2005.

COUGHLIN, P.J. “Domestic content legislation: house voting and the economic theory of regulation”. Economic Inquiry, vol. 23, p. 437-448, 1985.

DAVIS, F. L. “Balancing the perspectives on PAC contributions: in search of an impact on roll calls”. American Politics Quarterly, vol. 21, 1993.

DENZAU, A.; MUNGER, M. “Legislators and interest groups: how unorganized interest get represented”. American Political Science Review, vol. 80, p. 89-106, 1986.

DOW, J. K.; ENDERSBY, J. W. “Campaign contributions and legislative voting in the California Assembly”. American Politics Quarterly, vol. 22, 1994.

DRIVER, H. E.; KROEBER, A. L. Quantitative expressions of cultural relationships. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1932.

DURDEN, G. C.; SHOGREN, J. S.; SILBERMAN, J. L. “The effect of interest group pressure on coal strip-mining legislation”. Social Science Quarterly, vol. 72, p. 239-250, 1991.

EVANS, D. PAC contributions and roll-call voting: conditional power. In: CIGLER, A. J.; LOOMIS, B. A. (eds.). Interest group politics. 3ª ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1986.

FELDSTEIN, P. J.; MELNICK, G. “Congressional voting behavior on hospital legislation: an exploratory study”. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, vol. 8, no 4, 1984.

FIGUEIREDO FILHO, D. B. “O elo corporativo? Grupos de interesses, financiamento de campanha e regulação eleitoral”. Dissertação de Mestrado em Ciência Política. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, 2009.

FIGUEIREDO FILHO, D. B.; SILVA JUNIOR, J. A.; ROCHA, E. C. “Classificando regimes políticos utilizando análise de conglomerados”. Opinião Pública, Campinas, vol. 18, no 1, 2012.

FIGUEIREDO, A.; LIMONGI, F. Executivo e Legislativo na nova ordem constitucional. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV, 2001.

FLEISHER, R. “PAC contribution and congressional voting on national defense”. Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 18, p. 391-409, 1993.

FRENDREIS, J. P.; WATERMAN, R. W. “PAC contributions and legislative behavior: Senate voting on trucking deregulation”. Social Science Quarterly, vol. 66, p. 401-412, 1985.

GERBER, A. “The mismeasure of campaign spending: evidence from the 1990 U.S. House elections”. Journal of Politics, November, 1994.

GODWIN, K. One billion dollars of influence: the direct marketing of politics. Chatham: Chatham House, 1988.

GRENZKE, J. M. “PACs and the congressional supermarket: the currency is complex”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 33, p. 1-24, 1989.

GRIER, K. B.; MUNGER, M. C. “Comparing interest group PAC contributions to House and Senate incumbents, 1980-1986”. The Journal of Politics, vol. 55, no 3, p. 615-643, 1993.

HALL, R. L.; WAYMAN, F. W. “Buying time: moneyed interests and the mobilization of bias in congressional committees”. American Political Science Review, vol. 84, p. 797-820, 1990.

HERSCH, P. L.; MCDOUGALL, G. S. “Voting for ‘Sin’ in Kansas”. Public Choice, vol. 57, no 2, 1988.

HOLIAN, D. B.; KREBS, T. B. “Constituency opinion, Ross Perot, and Roll-Call Behavior in the U.S. House: The Case of the Nafta”. Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 22, 1997.

INÁCIO, M. Os poderes de agenda do presidente. In: ANASTASIA, F.; AVRITZER, L. (orgs.). Reforma política no Brasil. 1ª ed. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, p. 170-174, 2006.

JOHNSON, L. L. “The effectiveness of savings and loan political action committees”. Public Choice, vol. 46, no 3, 1985.

JONES, W.; KAISER, K. R. “Issue visibility and the effects of PAC money”. Social Science Quarterly, vol. 68, p. 170-176, 1987.

KAU, J. B.; RUBIN, P. H. “Voting on minimum wages: a time-series analysis”. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 86, p. 337- 342, 1978.

KING, G. "The future of replication". International Studies Perspectives, vol. 4, p. 443-499, 1995. Disponível em <http://gking.harvard.edu/gking/files/replvdc.pdf>.

KING, G.; KEOHANE, R; VERBA, S. Designing social inquiry. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1994.

KING, G.; ZENG, L. “Logistic regression in rare events data”. Political Analysis, vol. 9, p. 137-163, 2001.

LANDES, W. M.; POSNER, R. A. "The independent Judiciary in an interest-group perspective". Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 18, no 3, p. 875-901, 1975.

LANGBEIN, L. “Money and access: some empirical evidence”. The Journal of Politics, vol. 48, nº 4, p. 1.052-1.062, 1986.

LANGBEIN, L. “PACs, lobbies, and political conflict: the case of gun control”. Public Choice, vol. 77, p. 551-572, 1993.

LANGBEIN, L.; LOTWIS, M. “The political efficacy of lobbying and money: gun control in the U.S. House, 1986”. Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 15, 1990.

LEMOS, L. B.; MARCELINO, D.; PEDERIVA, J. H. “Por que dinheiro importa: a dinâmica das contribuições eleitorais para o Congresso Nacional em 2002 e 2006”. Opinião Pública [online]. vol. 16, no 2, p. 366-393, 2010.

LONG, J. S.; FREESE, J. Regression models for categorical dependent variables. College Station, TX: Stata Press, 2001.

MAGLEBY, D. B.; NELSON, C. J. The money chase: congressional campaign finance reform. Washington, D.C.: Brookings, 1990.

MALBIN, M. J. Money and politics in the United States: financing elections in the 1980s. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1984.

MANCUSO, W. P. O lobby da indústria no Congresso Nacional: empresariado e política no Brasil contemporâneo. São Paulo: Edusp/Humanitas, 2007.

MASTERS, M. F.; ZARDKOOHI, A. “Congressional support for unions: positions across diverse legislation”. Journal of Labor Research, vol. 9, p. 149-165, 1988.

MCCHESNEY, F. Money for nothing: politicians, rent extraction, and political extortion. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997.

MUTCH, R. Campaigns, Congress, and courts. The making of federal campaign finance law. New York: Praeger, 1988.

NEUSTADTL, A. “Interest group PACsmanship: an analysis of campaign contributions, issue visibility and legislative impact”. Social Forces, vol. 69, no 2, 1990.

OLSON, M. The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965.

PEIXOTO, V. “Votos: valem quanto pesam? O impacto do financiamento de campanhas eleitorais no Brasil”. Dissertação de Mestrado em Ciência Política do Instituto Universitário de Pesquisas do Rio de Janeiro, 2004.

PEIXOTO, V. Impacto dos gastos de campanhas nos resultados eleitorais. In: Anais do 32º Encontro Anual da Anpocs, CaxambuMG, 2008.

PEIXOTO, V. “Financiamento de campanhas nas eleições legislativas brasileiras em 2010”. Em Debate, Belo Horizonte, vol. 6, p. 36-54, 2014.

PELTZMAN, S. “Towards a more general theory of regulation”. Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 19, p. 211-240, 1976.

PELTZMAN, S. “Constituent interest and congressional voting”. Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 27, p. 181-210, 1984.

PINCUS, J. J. “Pressure groups and the pattern of tariffs”. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 83, p. 757-777, 1975.

PORTUGAL, A. C.; BUGARIN, M. “Financiamento público e privado de campanhas eleitorais: efeitos sobre bem-estar social e representação partidária no legislativo”. Revista de Economia Aplicada, Ribeirão Preto-SP, vol. 7, no 3, p. 549-584, 2003.

POSNER, R. “The social cost of monopoly and regulation”. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 83, p. 807-27, 1975.

POWER, T.; ZUCCO, C. “Estimating ideology of Brazilian Legislative parties, 1990-2005: a research communication”. Latin American Research Review, vol. 44, no 1, p. 218-246, 2009.

SABATO, L. PAC power: inside the world of political action committees. New York: W.W. Norton, 1985.

SALTZMAN, G. M. “Congressional voting on labor issues: the role of PACs”. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, vol. 40, p. 163-179, 1987.

SAMUELS, D. “Does money matter? Campaign finance in newly democratic countries: theory and evidence from Brazil”. Comparative Politics, vol. 34, p. 23-42, 2001a.

SAMUELS, D. Incumbents and challengers on a level playing field: assessing the impact of campaign finance in Brazil. The Journal of Politics, vol. 63, no 2, p. 569-84, 2001b.

SAMUELS, D. “Money, elections and democracy in Brazil”. Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 43, no 7, p. 27-48, 2001c.

SAMUELS, D. Financiamento de campanha e eleições no Brasil: o que podemos aprender com o “caixa um” e propostas de reforma. In: BENEVIDES, M. V., et al. (orgs.). Reforma política e cidadania. São Paulo: Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo, 2003.

SAMUELS, D. Financiamento de campanhas no Brasil e propostas de reforma. In: SOARES, G. A. D.; RENNÓ, L. R. Reforma política: lições da história recente. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV, 2006.

SANTOS, M. L. “O parlamento sob influência: o lobby da indústria na Câmara dos Deputados”. Tese de Doutorado em Ciência Política. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 2011.

SCHLOZMAN, K.; TIERNEY, J. Organized interests in American democracy. New York: Harper and Row, 1986.

SCHROEDEL, J. R. “Campaign contributions and legislative outcomes”. Western Political Quarterly, vol. 39, p. 371-389, 1986.

SHAVELL, S. “An economic analysis of threats and their illegality: blackmail, extortion, and robbery”. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 141, p. 1.877-1.902, 1993.

SILBERMAN, J.; DURDEN, G. C. “Determining legislative preferences on

the minimum wage: an economic approach”. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 84, p. 317-329, 1976.

SILVA JUNIOR, J. A. “As sementes da discórdia: regras e exceções da indisciplina partidária”. Dissertação de Mestrado em Ciência Política. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 2008.

SMITH, R. “Interest group influence in the U.S. Congress”. Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 20, no 1, p. 89-139, 1995.

SOKAL, R. R.; SNEATH, P. H. A. Principles of numerical taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1963.

STIGLER, G. “The theory of economic regulation”. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, vol. 2, p. 3-21, 1971.

STRATMANN, T. “What do campaign contributions buy? Deciphering the causal effects of money and votes”. Southern Economic Journal, vol. 100, p. 647-664, 1991.

STRATMANN, . “Campaign contributions and congressional voting: does the timing of contributions matter?”. Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 77, no 1, p. 127-136, 1995.

STRATMANN, . “The market for congressional votes: is timing of contributions everything?”. Journal of Law and Economics, vol.

, no 1, p. 85-114, 1998.

STRATMANN, . “Can special interests buy congressional votes? Evidence from financial services legislation”. Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 45, no 2, p. 345-374, 2002.

SULLIVAN, J. L.; FELDMAN, S. Multiple indicators: an introduction. Quantitative applications in the Social Sciences Series. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1979.

TOSINI, S. C.; TOWER, E. “The textile bill of 1985: the determinants of congressional voting patterns”. Public Choice, vol. 54, p. 19-25, 1987.

TRYON, R. Cluster analysis. New York: McGrawHill, 1939.

TULLOCK, G. “The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft”. Western Economic Journal, vol. 5, p. 224-232, 1967.

WAWRO, G. “A panel probit analysis of campaign contributions and roll call votes”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 45, p. 563-579, 2001.

WELCH, W. P. “Campaign contributions and legislative voting: milk money and dairy price supports”. Western Political Quarterly, vol. 35, p. 478-495, 1982.

WILHITE, A. “Union PAC contributions and legislative voting.” Journal of Labor Research, vol. 9, p. 79-90, 1988.

WILHITE, A.; PAUL, C. “Corporate campaign contributions and legislative voting”. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, vol. 29, p. 73-86, 1989.

WILHITE, A.; THEILMANN, J. “Unions, corporations, and political campaign contributions: the 1982 House elections”. Journal of Labor Research, vol. 7, p. 175-185, 1986.

WILHITE, A.; THEILMANN, J. “Labor PAC contributions and labor legislation: a simultaneous logit approach”. Public Choice, vol. 53, p. 267-276, 1987.

WRIGHT, J. R. “Contribution and roll calls: an organizational perspective”. American Journal of Political Science Review, vol. 79, p. 400-414, 1985.

WILHITE, A.; THEILMANN, J. “Contributions, lobbying, and committee voting in the U.S. House of Representatives”. American Political Science Review, vol. 84, p. 417-438, 1990.

A Opinião Pública utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.