Keywords
Vote
Right-wing
Survey experiment
How to Cite
Abstract
The prevailing view of the 2018 election is that the Brazilian electorate shifted to the right. In this article, we argue that one of the reasons explaining this increase in voters’ ideological self-positioning as right-wing can be attributed to the decision-making process of the vote itself, and not necessarily to an increase in the conservative electoral base. To test this hypothesis, we carried out two survey experiments that indicate that simple information about the position of President Bolsonaro had the following effects on respondents’ attitudes: 1) an increase in the percentage of those who declared a political position (right-wing or leftist); 2) a self-placement or identification, either swinging to the left or to the right, conditional on the voter’s predisposition to support or oppose Bolsonaro. The existence of a reverse causality effect indicates an alternative and complementary interpretation of the relationship between ideology and the electoral process, thus having important implications for understanding the current context of Brazilian elections.
References
ALMEIDA, M. H. T.; GUARNIERI, F. H. “The unlikely president: the populist captain and his voters”. Revista Euro Latinoamericana de Análisis Social y Político, vol 1, no 1, p.139-59, 2020.
AMARAL, O. E. “The victory of Jair Bolsonaro according to the Brazilian Electoral Study of 2018”. Brazilian Political Science Review, vol. 14, no 1, p. 1-13, 2020.
ARCENEAUX, K. “Can partisan cues diminish democratic accountability?”. Political Behavior, vol. 30, no 2, p.139-60, 2008.
BARBER, M.; POPE, J. “Does party Trump ideology? Disentangling party and ideology in America”. American Political Science Review, vol.113, no 1, p. 38-54. 2019.
BARTELS, L. M. “Uninformed votes: information effects in presidential elections”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 40, no 1, p. 194-230, 1996.
BATISTA PEREIRA, F. “Non causa pro causa: o voto de direita e esquerda no Brasil”. Opinião Pública, vol. 26, no 2, p. 154-79, 2020.
BERELSON, B. D.; LAZARSFELD, P. F.; MCPHEE, W. N. Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1954.
BISHOP, G. F. The illusion of public opinion: fact and artifact in American public opinion polls. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005.
BORGES, A.; VIDIGAL, R. “Do lulismo ao antipetismo? Polarização, partidarismo e voto nas eleições presidenciais brasileiras”. Opinião Pública, vol. 24, no 1, p. 53-89, 2018.
BRADY, H. E.; SNIDERMAN, P. M. “Attitude attribution: a group basis for political reasoning”. American Political Science Review, vol. 79, no 4, p. 1061-78, 1995.
CAMPBELL, A. et al. The American voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1960.
CARMINES, E. G.; STIMSON, J. A. Issue evolution: race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020.
CASTRO, M. M. M. “Determinantes do comportamento eleitoral – a centralidade da sofisticação política”. Tese de Doutorado em Ciência Política e Sociologia, Sociedade Brasileira de Instrução – SBI/Iuperj, Rio de Janeiro, 1994.
CONVERSE, P. E. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: APTER, D. E. (Ed.). Ideology e Discontent. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, p. 206-261, 1964.
DELLI CARPINI, M. X.; KEETER, S. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, C.T.: Yale University Press, 1996.
DIX, R. H. “Cleavage structures and party systems in Latin America”. Comparative Politics, vol. 22, no 1, p. 23-37, 1989.
DOWNS, A. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper; Row, 1957.
FUKS, M.; MARQUES, P. H. “Contexto e voto: o impacto da reorganização da direita sobre a consistência ideológica do voto nas eleições de 2018”. Opinião Pública, vol. 26, no 3, p. 401-430, 2020.
FUKS, M.; RIBEIRO, E.; BORBA, J. “From antipetismo to generalized antipartisanship: the impact of rejection of political parties on the 2018 vote for Bolsonaro”. Brazilian Political Science Review, vol.15, no 1, p. 1-28, 2021.
HUDDY, L.; MASON, L.; AAROE, L. “Expressive partisanship: campaign involvement, political emotion, e partisan identity”. American Political Science Review, vol. 109, no 1, p. 1–17, 2015.
KAM, C. D. “Who toes the party line? cues, values, and individual differences”. Political Behavior, vol. 27, no 2, p. 163-82, 2005.
KEY JR., V. O. The responsible electorate: rationality in presidential voting, 1936–1960. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966.
KINDER, D. R. Diversity and complexity in American public opinion. In: FINIFTER, A. W. (ed.). Political science: the state of the discipline. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association, 1983.
KITSCHELT, H. et al. Latin American party systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
KUKLINSKI, J. H., et al. “The political environment and citizen competence”. American Journal of Political Science, vol.104, no 2, p. 236-48, 2001.
LAU, R. R.; REDLAWSK, D. P. “Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 45, no 4, p. 951-71, 2001.
LAYTON, M. L., et al. “Demographic polarization and the rise of the far right: Brazil’s 2018 presidential election”. Research & Politics, vol. 8, no 1, p. 139-59, 2021.
LENZ, G. S. “Learning and opinion change, not priming: reconsidering the priming hypothesis”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 53, no 4, p. 821-37, 2009.
LENZ, G. S. Follow the leader? How voters respond to politicians’ policies and performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.
LEVENDUSKY, M. S. “Why do partisan media polarize viewers?”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 57, no 3, p. 611-22, 2013.
LUSKIN, R. C. “Measuring political sophistication”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 31, no 4, p. 856-99, 1987.
MAINWARING, S.; SCULLY, T. R. Building democratic institutions: party systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1995.
MONDAK, J. J. “Source cues and policy approval: the cognitive dynamics of public support for the reagan agenda”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 37, no 1, p. 186-212, 1993.
NICOLAU, J. O Brasil dobrou à direita: uma radiografia da eleição de Bolsonaro em 2018. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2020.
PIMENTEL JR., J. T. P. “Razão e emoção: o voto na eleição presidencial de 2006”. Opinião Pública, vol. 16, no 2, p. 516-41, 2010.
REIS, F. W. “O tabelão e a lupa: teoria, método generalizante e idiografia no contexto brasileiro”. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, vol. 16, no 6, p. 27-42, 1991.
REIS, F. W.; CASTRO, M. M. M. “Regiões, classe e ideologia no processo eleitoral brasileiro”. Lua Nova, vol. 26, no 3, p. 81-131, 1992.
RENNÓ, L. R. “The Bolsonaro voter: issue positions and vote choice in the 2018 Brazilian presidential elections”. Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 62, no 4, p. 1-23, 2020.
RIBEIRO, E.; CARREIRÃO, Y.; BORBA, J. “Sentimentos partidários e antipetismo: condicionantes e covariantes”. Opinião Pública, vol. 22, no 3, p. 603-37, 2016.
SAMUELS, D. J.; ZUCCO, C. “The power of partisanship in Brazil: evidence from survey experiments”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 58, no 1, p. 212-25, 2014.
SAMUELS, D. J.; ZUCCO, C. Partisans, antipartisans, and nonpartisans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
SETZLER, M. “Did Brazilians Vote for Jair Bolsonaro because they share his most controversial views?”. Brazilian Political Science Review, vol. 15, no 1, p. 1-16, 2021.
SINGER, A. Esquerda e direita no eleitorado brasileiro: a identificação ideológica nas disputas presidenciais de 1989 e 1994. São Paulo: EdUSP, 1999.
SINGER, M. “Elite polarization and the electoral impact of left-right placements: evidence from Latin America, 1995-2009”. Latin American Research Review, vol. 51, no 2, p. 174-94, 2016.
STIMSON, J. A. Tides of consent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
ZAJONC, R. B. “Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences”. American Psychologist, vol. 35, no 2, p. 151-75, 1980.
ZALLER, J. The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
ZECHMEISTER, E. J. “What’s left and who’s right? A Q-Method study of individual and contextual influences on the meaning of ideological labels”. Political Behavior, vol. 28, no 2, p.151-73, 2006.
ZECHMEISTER, E. J. Left-Right Identifications and the Latin American Voter. In: ZECHMEISTER, E., et al. (eds.). The Latin American voter: pursuing representation and accountability in challenging contexts. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 2015.
ZECHMEISTER, E. J.; CORRAL, M. “Institutional and contextual constraints on ideological labels in Latin America”. Comparative Political Studies, vol. 46, no 6, p. 675-701, 2013.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Opinião Pública
Downloads
