Keywords
Digital methods
Analysis of rank flows
Astroturfing
How to Cite
Abstract
The objective of this article is to understand the dynamics concerning political actions, carried out through hashtags on Twitter. Its main goal is to determine if the monitoring of trending topics can help to identify moments of acute political tension. Based on an analysis of rank flows, the main hypothesis raised by this investigation is that, as indications of online public opinion, trends can
operate as a thermometer of the climate of opinion in networks. In addition, it is possible to note, through the use of hashtags as markers of support and disarray, the use of astroturfing tactics to achieve visibility and repercussion on social media. The study undertook a systematic collection of the main trends in Brazil, between January and July 2019, to evaluate strategies related to the competitive capacity of these groups.
References
ARNAUDO, D. “Computational Propaganda in Brazil: Social Bots during Elections”. Computational Propaganda Research Project, Oxford, n. 2017.8, p. 2-38, 2017.
ARNAUDO, D. Brazil: political bot intervention during pivotal events. In: WOOLLEY, S.; HOWARD, P.(Orgs.). Computational propaganda: political parties, politicians, and political manipulation on social media. Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press, 2019.
ASSUNÇÃO, A., et al. Estratégias de campanha política online: Marcelo Freixo nas eleições para a prefeitura do Rio de Janeiro em 2012. In: ALDÉ, A.; MARQUES, F. P. J. A. (orgs.). Internet e poder local. Salvador: Edufba e Compolítica, 2015.
ASUR, A., et al. “Trends in social media: persistence and decay”. SSRN Electronic Journal, p. 1-8, fev. 2011.
BAILO, F.; VROMEN, A. “Hybrid social and news media protest events: from #MarchinMarch to #BusttheBudget in Australia”. Information, Communication & Society, vol. 20, n° 11, p. 1660-1679, nov. 2017.
BANET-WEISER, S.; MILTNER, K. “#MasculinitySoFragile: culture, structure, and networked misogyny”.Feminist Media Studies, vol. 16, n° 1, p. 171-174, 2016.
BATISTA, J. C.; ZAGO, G. “Ativismo em Redes Sociais Digitais: Os fluxos de comunicação no caso #forasarney”. Estudos em Comunicação, n° 8, p. 129-146, dez. 2010.
BENNETT, W. L.; SEGERBERG, A. “The logic of connective action”. Information, Communication & Society, vol. 15, n° 5, p. 739-768, abr. 2012.
BONILLA, Y.; ROSA, J. “#Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States”. American Ethnologist, vol. 42, n° 1, p. 4-17, jan. 2015.
BOSCH, T. “Twitter activism and youth in South Africa: the case of #RhodesMustFall”. Information, Communication & Society, vol. 20, n° 2, p. 221-232, 2017.
BRUNDIDGE, J.; RICE, R. Political engagement online: do the information rich get richer and the likeminded more similar?. In: CHADWICK, A.; HOWARD, P. (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics. Nova Iorque: Routledge, 2010.
BRUNS, A.; BURGESS, J. “The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics”. In:Proceedings of the 6th European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) General Conference 2011, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, 2011.
BRUNS, A.; BURGESS, J. Twitter hashtags from ad hoc to calculated publics. In: RAMBUKKANA, N. (ed.). Hashtag publics: the power and politics of discursive networks. Nova Iorque: Peter Lang, 2015.
BRUNS, A., et al. “Towards a typology of hashtag publics: a large-scale comparative study of user engagement across trending topics”. Communication Research and Practice, vol. 2, n° 1, p. 20-46, 2016.
BURGESS, J.; BAYM, N. Twitter: a biography. Nova Iorque: New York University Press, 2017.
CHAGAS, V. Sobre vaias: considerações acerca do jogo político (political game) e da brincadeira política (political play). In: CALABRE, L., et al. (orgs.). Memória das Olimpíadas no Brasil: diálogos e olhares, vol. 1. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Casa Rui, 2017.
CHAGAS, V. “WhatsApp and Digital Astroturfing: A Social Network Analysis of Brazilian Political Discussion Groups of Bolsonaro’s Supporters”. International Journal of Communication, vol. 16, p.2431-2455, abr. 2022.
CHAGAS, V., et al. “Far‐right digital activism in polarized contexts: a comparative analysis of engagement in hashtag wars”. Media and Communication, vol. 10, n° 4, out. 2022.
CHENG, Z.; CAVERLEE, J.; LEE, K. “You are where you tweet: a content-based approach to geo-locating Twitter users”. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management – CIKM ’10, Toronto, p. 1-10, 2010.
DASGUPTA, A., et al. “The discoverability of the web”. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on World Wide Web - WWW '07, Banff, p. 421-430, 2007.
DISTIL NETWORKS. “2019 Bad Bot Report: the bot arms race continues”. In: Distil Networks Research Lab, Distil Networks. Disponível em: <https://www.distilnetworks.com/research-lab>. Acesso em: 8 set. 2019.
DVIR-GVIRSMAN, S. “Media audience homophily: Partisan websites, audience identity and polarization processes”. New Media & Society, vol. 19, n° 7, p. 1072-1091, 2017.
FALTESEK, D. #Time. In: RAMBUKKANA, N. (org.). Hashtag publics: the power and politics of discursive networks. Nova Iorque: Peter Lang, 2015.
FERRARA, E., et al. “The rise of social bots”. Communications of the ACM, vol. 59, n° 7, p. 96-104, 2016.
FLORES-YEFFAL, N. Y.; VIDALES, G.; MARTINEZ, G. “#WakeUpAmerica, #IllegalsAreCriminals: the role of the cyber public sphere in the perpetuation of the Latino cyber-moral panic in the US”. Information,Communication & Society, vol. 22, n° 3, p. 402-419, 2019.
GAINOUS, J.; WAGNER, K. Tweeting to power: the social media revolution in American Politics. Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press, 2014.
GERRARD, Y. “Beyond the hashtag: Circumventing content moderation on social media”. New Media & Society, vol. 20, n° 12, p. 4492-4511, 2018.
HAGEN, S. Rendering legible the ephemerality of 4chan/pol/. In: Open Intelligence Lab (OIL). Disponível em: <https://oilab.eu/rendering-legible-the-ephemerality-of-4chanpol/>. Acesso em: 14 set. 2019.
HAGEN, S. “‘Who is /ourguy/?’: Tracing panoramic memes to study the collectivity of 4chan/pol/”.New Media & Society, 2022.
HEGELICH, S.; JANETZKO, D. “Are social bots on Twitter political actors? Empirical evidence from a Ukrainian social botnet”. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2016), Cologne, 2016
HIGHFIELD, T. Social media and everyday politics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2015.
HIGHFIELD, T.; LEAVER, T. “Instagrammatics and digital methods: studying visual social media, from selfies and GIFs to memes and emoji”. Communication Research and Practice, vol. 2, n° 1, p. 47-62, 2016.
HOWARD, P. “Digitizing the social contract: producing American political culture in the Age of New Media”. The Communication Review, vol. 6, n° 3, p. 213-245, 2003.
HOWARD, P. New media campaigns and the managed citizen. Nova Iorque: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
HOWARD, P. “Astroturf grows best in election season”. In: Phil Howard / philhoward.org. 2013.Disponível em: <http://philhoward.org/astroturf-grows-best-in-election-season/>. Acesso em: 8 set. 2019.
HOWARD, P.; KOLLANYI, B. “Bots, #StrongerIn, and #Brexit: Computational Propaganda during the UK-EU Referendum”. Comprop Research Note, 2016.
JOHNSTON, A. “New questions about why #Wikileaks isn’t trending on Twitter”. In: Student Activism.2010. Disponível em: <https://studentactivism.net/2010/12/05/twitter-wikileaks-trending-2/>.Acesso em: 14 set. 2019.
KELLER, F., et al. “How to manipulate social media: analyzing political astroturfing using ground truth data from South Korea”. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2017), Montreal, 2017.
KUO, R. “Racial justice activist hashtags: Counterpublics and discourse circulation”. New Media & Society, vol. 20, n° 2, p. 495-514, 2018.
KWAK, H., et al. “What is Twitter, a social network or news media?”. In: Proceedings of the WWW 2010, International World Wide Web Conference Committee (IW3C2), p. 591-600, 2010.
LEISER, M. “AstroTurfing, 'CyberTurfing' and other online persuasion campaigns”. European Journal of Law and Technology, vol. 7, n° 1, p. 1-27, 2016.
LOKOT, T. “#IAmNotAfraidToSayIt: stories of sexual violence as everyday political speech on Facebook”. Information, Communication & Society, vol. 21, n° 6, p. 802-817, 2018.
MERAZ, S.; PAPACHARISSI, Z. “Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt”. The International Journal of Press/Politics, vol. 18, n° 2, p. 138-166, 2013.
MESSINA, C. “Groups for Twitter, or a Proposal for Twitter Tag Channels”. In: Factory Joe. 2007. Disponível em: <https://factoryjoe.com/2007/08/25/groups-for-twitter-or-a-proposal-for-twittertag-channels/>. Acesso em: 14 set. 2019.
MONACO, N. Taiwan: digital democracy meets automated autocracy. In: WOOLLEY, S.; HOWARD, P.(Orgs.). Computational propaganda: political parties, politicians, and political manipulation on social media. Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press, 2019.
MOON, B.; SUZOR, N.; MATAMOROS-FERNANDES, A. “Beyond hashtags: collecting and analyzing conversations on Twitter”. AoIR, Selected Papers of AoIR 2016: The 17th Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers, Berlin, 2016.
NATAHSON, G.; REIS, J. S. “Com quantas hashtags se constrói um movimento? O que nos diz a ‘Primavera Feminista’ brasileira”. Tríade, vol. 5, n° 10, p. 113-130, 2017.
OFORI-PARKU, S.; MOSCATO, S. “Hashtag Activism as a Form of Political Action: A Qualitative Analysis of the #BringBackOurGirls Campaign in Nigerian, UK, and U.S. Press”. International Journal of Communication, vol. 12, p. 2480-2502, 2018.
PAPACHARISSI, Z. The virtual public sphere 2.0: the internet, the public sphere, and beyond. In:CHADWICK, A.; HOWARD, P. (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics. Nova Iorque: Routledge, 2010.
PAPACHARISSI, Z. Affective publics. Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press, 2015.
PAPACHARISSI, Z.; FATIMA OLIVEIRA, M. “Affective News and Networked Publics: The Rhythms of News Storytelling on #Egypt”. Journal of Communication, vol. 62, n° 2, p. 266-282, 2012.
PEARCE, W., et al. “Visual cross-platform analysis: digital methods to research social media images”. Information, Communication & Society, p. 1-21, 2018.
PEETERS, S., et al. “On the Vernacular Language Games of an Antagonistic Online Subculture”. Frontiers of Big Data, vol. 4, 2021.
RAMBUKKANA, N. #Introduction: Hashtags as Technosocial Events. In: RAMBUKKANA, N. (Ed.). Hashtag publics: the power and politics of discursive networks. Nova Iorque: Peter Lang, 2015.
RATHNAYAKE, C.; SUTHERS, D. “Twitter issue response hashtags as affordances for momentary connectedness”. Social Media + Society, vol. 4, n° 3, p. 1-14, 2018.
RATKIEWICZ, J., et al. “Detecting and Tracking Political Abuse in Social Media”. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, 2011.
RAYNAULD, V.; RICHEZ, E.; MORRIS, K. “Canada is #IdleNoMore: exploring dynamics of Indigenous political and civic protest in the Twitterverse”. Information, Communication & Society, vol. 21, n° 4, p. 626-642, 2017.
RECUERO, R., et al. “Hashtags functions in the protests across Brazil”. SAGE Open, vol. 5, n° 2, p. 1-14, 2015.
RENTSCHLER, C.; THRIFT, S. “Doing feminism in the network: Networked laughter and the ‘Binders Full of Women’ meme”. Feminist Theory, vol. 16, n° 3, p. 329-359, 2015.
SHIFMAN, L. Memes in digital culture. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2014.
SILVA, D. R. Astroturfing: lógicas e dinâmicas de manifestações de públicos simulados. Belo Horizonte: FAFICH/Selo PPGCOM/UFMG, 2015.
SLOAM, J. “#Votebecause: Youth mobilisation for the referendum on British membership of the European Union”. New Media & Society, vol. 20, n° 11, p. 4017-4034, 2018.
SOARES, F.; RECUERO, R. “Hashtag Wars: political disinformation and discursive struggles on Twitter conversations during the 2018 Brazilian presidential campaign”. Social Media + Society, vol. 7, n° 2, 2021.
THRIFT, S. “#YesAllWomen as Feminist Meme Event”. Feminist Media Studies, vol. 14, n° 6, p. 1090-1092, 2014.
TWITTER. “Perguntas frequentes sobre assuntos do momento no Twitter”. In: Central de Ajuda do Twitter. Disponível em: <https://help.twitter.com/pt/using-twitter/twitter-trending-faqs>. Acesso em: 14 set. 2019
TWITTER. “To trend or not to trend?”. In: Twitter Official Blog. 2010. Disponível em:<https://blog.twitter.com/official/en_us/a/2010/to-trend-or-not-to-trend.html>. Acesso em: 14 set.2019.
VICARI, S.; IANNELLI, L.; ZUROVAC, E. “Political hashtag publics and counter-visuality: a case study of #fertilityday in Italy”. Information, Communication & Society, vol. 23, n° 9, p. 1-21, 2018.
VON BÜLOW, M.; DIAS, T. “O ativismo de hashtags contra e a favor do impeachment de Dilma Rousseff”. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, n° 120, p. 5-32, 2019.
WEBBER, W.; MOFFAT, A.; ZOBEL, J. “A similarity measure for indefinite rankings”. ACM Transactions of Information Systems, vol. 28, n° 4, p. 1-38, 2010.
WOOLLEY, S.; HOWARD, P. Introduction: computational propaganda worldwide. In: WOOLLEY, S.;HOWARD, P. (Orgs.). Computational propaganda: political parties, politicians, and political manipulation on social media. Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press, 2019.
ZUBIAGA, A., et al. “Real-time classification of Twitter trends”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 66, n° 3, p. 462-473, 2015.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Opinião Pública
Downloads
