Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
Este artigo discute a relação entre as abordagens deliberacionistas de democracia e a Teoria Crítica. Para tanto, apresentam-se três argumentos que sugerem uma dissociação entre os dois corpos teóricos: 1) A deliberação reforça quadros de dominação existentes; 2) A deliberação conformou-se às instituições liberais em voga; e 3) A guinada empírica dos estudos deliberativos aproximaram-nos da teoria tradicional. A partir desses argumentos, o texto ressalta a existência de um diálogo instável entre a abordagem deliberativa e o legado frankfurtiano.
Abstract:
This paper discuss the relationship between deliberative approaches of democracy and critical theory. In order to do so, it presents three arguments that suggest a deep distinction between these two theoretical traditions: 1) Deliberation reinforces existent forms of domination; 2) Deliberation has accepted the existent democratic liberal institutions; 3) The empirical turn of deliberative literature has brought it closer to traditional theory. Based on these arguments, the article highlights the existence of an instable dialogue between the deliberative approach and the Frankfurtian legacy.
Keywords: Deliberative Democracy; Democratic Theory; Critical Theory; Frankfurt School; Political Philosophy
Referências
ADORNO, T. W.; HORKHEIMER, M. Dialética do esclarecimento: fragmentos filosóficos. Rio de Janeiro: J. Zahar Editor, 1985.
BACHTIGER, A.; SHIKANO, S.; PEDRINI, S.; RYSER, M. “Measuring Deliberation 2.0: Standards, Discourse Types, and Sequenzialization”. Trabalho apresentado em ECPR General Conference. Potsdam, 5-12 Sept. 2009.
BLACK, L. W. “Deliberation, Storytelling, and Dialogic Moments”. Communication Theory, vol. 18, n° 1, p. 93-116, Feb. 2008.
BLACK, L. W.; URKHALTER, S.; GASTIL, J.; STROMER-GALLEY, J. “Methods for Analyzing and Measuring Group Deliberation”. In: HOLBERT, L. (Ed.). Sourcebook of Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques. New York: Routledge, 2009.
BOHMAN, J. Deliberation: pluralism, complexity and democracy. Cambridge: MIT, 1996.
BOHMAN, J. Democracy across borders: from Dêmos to Dêmoi. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2007.
CARNAÚBA, M. E. C. “Sobre a distinção entre teoria tradicional e teoria crítica em Max Horkheimer”. Kínesis, II (03), p. 195-204, 2010.
CHAMBERS, S. “Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: has deliberative democracy abandoned mass democracy?” Political Theory, vol. 37, n° 3, p. 323-350, 2009.
CONOVER, P. J; SEARING, D. D. “Studying ‘Everyday Political Talk’ in the Deliberative System”. Acta Politica, International Journal of Political Science, vol. 40, n° 3, p. 269-283, 2005.
CORNWALL, A.; COELHO, V. S. Novos espaços democráticos: perspectivas internacionais. São Paulo: Editora Singular, 2009.
DAHLBERG, L. “The habermasian public sphere: taking difference seriously?” Theory and Society, vol. 34, n° 2, p. 111- 136, 2005.
DAVIES, T; GANGADHRAN, S. P. (Orgs.). Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.
DEAN, J. “Why the net is not a public sphere”. Constellations, vol. 10, n° 1, p. 95-112, 2003.
DRYZEK, J. S. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: liberals, critics, contestations. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000a.
DRYZEK, J. S. Discursive democracy vs. liberal constitutionalism. In: SAWARD, M. (ed.). Democratic innovation. Londres: Routledge, p. 78-89, 2000b.
DRYZEK, J. S. Deliberative Global Politics: Discourse and democracy in a divided world. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2006.
DRYZEK, J. S. “The empirical turn in deliberative democracy”. Trabalho apresentado em Theory and practice of deliberative democracy workshop, ANU, Canberra, 7-8 fev. 2008.
DRYZEK, J. S. “Rhetoric in Democracy: A Systemic Appreciation”. Political Theory, vol. 38, n° 3, p. 319-339, 2010.
DRYZEK, J. S.; NIEMEYER, S. “Reconciling pluralism and consensus as political ideals”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 50, n° 3, p. 634-649, 2006.
DUARTE, R. Adornos: nove ensaios sobre o filósofo frankfurtiano. Belo Horizonte: Ed. UFMG, 1997.
DUARTE, R. Adorno/Horkheimer & A Dialética do Esclarecimento. RJ: Jorge Zahar, 2002.
ETTEMA, J. S. “Journalism as reason-giving: deliberative democracy, institutional accountability, and the News Media’s Mission”. Political Communication, vol. 24, n° 2, p. 143-160, 2007.
FARIA, C. F. “Do ideal ao real: as consequências das mudanças conceituais na teoria da democracia deliberativa”. 7º Encontro da ABCP, Recife, 4 - 7 ago. 2010.
FRASER, N. Rethinking the Public Sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In: DURING, S. (ed.). The Cultural Studies Reader. Londres: Routledge, p. 518-536, 1999.
FUNG, A; WRIGHT, E. (eds.). Deepening Democracy. Londres/NY: Verso, 2003.
GASTIL, J; LEVINE, P. (eds.). The deliberative democracy handbook: strategies for effective civic engagement in the twenty-first century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005.
GOMES, W. Esfera Pública Política e Comunicação em Direito e Democracia de Jürgen Habermas. In: GOMES, W.; MAIA, R. (eds.). Comunicação e Democracia. SP: Paulus, p. 69-115, 2008.
GOODIN, R. E. “Sequencing Deliberative Moments”. Acta Politica, International Journal of Political Science, vol. 40, n° 2, p. 182-196, 2005.
GRAHAM, T; WITSCHGE, T. “In search of online deliberation: Towards a new method for examining the quality of online discussions”. Communications, vol. 28, n° 2, p. 173-204, 2003.
HABERMAS, J. The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press, 1983.
HABERMAS, J. The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2: Lifeworld and system – a critique of functionalist reason. Boston: Beacon Press, 1987.
HABERMAS, J. Direito e Democracia: entre a facticidade e a validade. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 1997.
HABERMAS, J. A constelação pós-nacional. São Paulo: Littera Mundi, 2001.
HABERMAS, J. “Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research”. Communication Theory, vol. 16, n° 4, p. 411-426, 2006.
HENDRIKS, C. M. “Integrated Deliberation: Reconciling Civil Society’s Dual Role in Deliberative Democracy”. Political Studies, vol. 54, n° 3, p. 486–508, 2006.
HENDRIKS, C. M.; CARSON, L. “Can the market help the forum? Negotiating the commercialisation of deliberative democracy”. Policy Sciences, vol. 41, n° 4, p. 293-313, 2008.
HONNETH, A. Luta por reconhecimento: a gramática moral dos conflitos sociais. São Paulo: Ed. 34, p. 7-19, 2003.
HORKHEIMER, M. “Teoria Tradicional e Teoria Crítica”. In: Coleção Os pensadores. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, p. 125-162, 1975a.
HORKHEIMER, M. “Filosofia e Teoria Crítica”. In: Coleção Os pensadores. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, p. 163-169, 1975b.
JAY, M. The dialectical imagination: a history of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research 1923-1950. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.
MAIA, R. C. M. (org.). Mídia e Deliberação. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV, 2008.
MANSBRIDGE, J. Everyday Talk in Deliberative System. In: MACEDO, S. (ed.). Deliberative Politics: essays on democracy and disagreement. NY: Oxford University Press, p. 211-239. 1999.
MANSBRIDGE, J. “Deliberative Democracy or Democratic Deliberation?” In: ROSENBERG, S. (org.). Deliberation, participation and democracy: can the people govern? NY: Palgrave, p. 251-271, 2007.
MANSBRIDGE, J.; BOHMAN, J.; CHAMBERS, S.; ESTLUND, D; FOLLESDAL, A.; FUNG, A.; LAFONT, C.; MANIN, B.; MARTI, J.L. “The place of self-interest and the role of power in deliberative democracy”. Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 18, n° 1, p. 64-100, 2010.
MEDEARIS, J. “Social movements and deliberative democratic theory”. British Journal of Political Science, 35, p. 53-75, 2004.
MENDONÇA, R. F. “Reconhecimento e (qual?) deliberação”. Opinião Pública, vol. 17, n° 1, p. 206-227, 2011.
MENDONÇA, R. F.; SANTOS, D. B. “A cooperação na deliberação pública: um estudo de caso sobre o referendo acerca da proibição da comercialização de armas de fogo no Brasil”. DADOS - Revista de Ciências Sociais, vol. 52, n° 2, p. 507-542, 2009 MIGUEL, L. F. “Representação e interesses: uma crítica a Young e Urbinati”. 7º Encontro da ABCP, Recife, 4-7 ago. 2010.
MOUFFE, C. “Por um modelo agonístico de democracia”. Revista de Sociologia e Política, vol. 25, p. 11-23, 2005.
NOBRE, M. Apresentação. In: HONNETH, A. Luta por reconhecimento: a gramática moral dos conflitos sociais. São Paulo: Ed. 34, p. 7-19, 2003.
NOBRE, M. A Teoria Crítica. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar, 2004.
NOBRE, M. Curso Livre de Teoria Crítica. Campinas: Papirus, 2008.
PARKINSON, J. Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
PEREIRA, M. A. “Movimentos sociais e democracia: a tensão necessária”. Texto apresentado no V. Congresso Latino Americano de Ciência Política, Buenos Aires, 28-30 jul. 2010.
POLLETTA, F. “Just Talk: Public Deliberation after 9/11”. Journal of Public Deliberation, vol. 4, n° 1, p. 1-22, 2008.
ROSENBERG, S. “The Empirical Study of Deliberative Democracy: Setting a Research Agenda”. Acta Politica, International Journal of Political Science, vol. 40, n° 2, p. 212-224, 2005.
ROSENBERG, S. An introduction: Theoretical perspectives and empirical research on deliberative democracy. In: ROSENBERG, S. Deliberation, participation and democracy: can the people govern? New York: Palgrave MacMillan, p. 1-25, 2007.
SANDERS, L. “Against Deliberation”. Political Theory, vol. 25, n° 3, p. 347-376, 1997.
SHAPIRO, I. Enough of deliberation: Politics is about interests and power. In: MACEDO, S. (ed.). Deliberative Politics: essays on democracy and disagreement. Nova York / Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 28-38, 1999.
STEENBERGEN, M. R.; BÄCHTIGER, A.; SPÖRNDLI, M.; STEINER, J. “Measuring deliberation: a discourse quality index”. Comparative European Politics, vol. 1, n° 1, p. 21-48, 2003.
STROMER-GALLEY, J. “Measuring Deliberation’s Content: A Coding Scheme”. Journal of Public Deliberation, vol. 3, n° 1, p. 1-35, 2007.
THOMPSON, D. “Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science”. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, p. 497-520, 2008.
WALES, C.; COTTERILL, S.; SMITH, G. “Do citizens ‘deliberate’ in on-line discussion forums? Preliminary findings from an internet experiment”. 60th Political Studies Association Conference, Edinburgh, 2010.
WESSLER, H. “Investigating deliberativeness comparatively”. Political Communication, vol. 25, n° 1, p. 1-22, 2008.
WHEATLAND, T. The Frankfurt School in Exile. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009.
WIGGERSHAUS, R. A Escola de Frankfurt: História, desenvolvimento teórico, significação política. Rio de Janeiro: DIFEL, 2002.
XENOS, S. “New mediated deliberation? Blog and press coverage of the Alito nomination”. Journal of Computer-mediated communication, vol. 13. n° 2, p. 485-503, 2008.
YOUNG, I. Communication and the Other: beyond deliberative democracy. In: BEBHABIB, S. (ed.). Democracy and difference: contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton: Princeton University Press, p. 120-135, 1996.
YOUNG, I. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
YOUNG, I. Activist Challenges to deliberative democracy. In: FISHKIN, J.; LASLETT, P. (eds.). Debating deliberative democracy. Malden: Blackwell, p. 102-120, 2003.
A Opinião Pública utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.
Downloads
