The subversive writing of "n. d. a.": a stray and grotesque body

Abstract

The writing understood according to structural drift which disseminates meanings through the displacement of relations between scriptural sources and marks constitutes a problematization of logocentric conceptions of the act of writing and its readability, which are based, above all, on notions of representation, identity, authorship and canonical textual arrangement. In this sense, we will problematize, in this article, how the writing of "n. d. a "by Arnaldo Antunes, is structured by relations of meaning that dispense with imperatives of creation that trace a productive source and a stable sense through the appearance of images of grotesque realism (BAKHTIN, 1987). For this, we are based on Derrida (1972), specifically, when he treats the issue of the writing like mark in drift and the relation of that question with the one of the signature; and Bakhtin (1987), when it deals with the material and corporal principle of the popular comic culture. Finally, we intend to indicate that the deconstructive scriptural relations characteristic of the poems in the book "n. d. a” are woven by the decentering of discoursive production practice based on reduced relations of meaning to the identification of authorial intention and on the organization of referential discoursive forms and objective ones.