Comparison of methods to evaluate implant-abutment interface

Authors

  • Karina Oliveira de Faria Federal University of Uberlandia
  • Clébio Domingues da Silveira Júnior Federal University of Uberlandia
  • João Paulo da Silva Neto University of Campinas
  • Maria da Glória Chiarello de Mattos University of São Paulo
  • Marlete Ribeiro da Silva University of Campinas
  • Flávio Domingues das Neves Federal University of Uberlandia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v12i1.8641139

Keywords:

Dental implant, Scanning electron microscopy, Methodology

Abstract

Aim: To compare two main methods of two-dimensional measurement of fit at the implant prosthodontic interface, testing the hypothesis that optical microscopy (OM) can reliably and efficiently scanning electronic microscopy (SEM). Methods: Four frameworks with four titanium abutments joined with titanium bars were used. The implant-abutment interfaces were examined by three different methods, forming 3 groups: analysis by OM (40x), and analysis by SEM at 300x and 500x. Readings were taken at the mesial and distal proximal surfaces on the horizontal and vertical axes of each implant (n=32). One-way ANOVA with a significance level of 5% was used for statistical analysis. Results: Neither the horizontal fit nor vertical fit values of the 3 groups presented statistically significant differences (p=0.410 and p=0.543). Conclusions: OM was found to be an accurate two-dimensional method for abutment-framework or implant-abutment interface measurements, with lower costs than SEM. SEM micrographs at 500x presented technical difficulties for the readings that might produce different results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Karina Oliveira de Faria, Federal University of Uberlandia

Department of Occlusion, Fixed Prosthesis and Dental Materials, Federal University of Uberlandia, School of Dentistry, Uberlândia, MG.

Clébio Domingues da Silveira Júnior, Federal University of Uberlandia

Department of Occlusion, Fixed Prosthesis and Dental Materials, Federal University of Uberlandia, School of Dentistry, Uberlândia, MG.

João Paulo da Silva Neto, University of Campinas

Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP.

Maria da Glória Chiarello de Mattos, University of São Paulo

Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, University of São Paulo, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP.

Marlete Ribeiro da Silva, University of Campinas

Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP.

Flávio Domingues das Neves, Federal University of Uberlandia

Department of Occlusion, Fixed Prosthesis and Dental Materials, Federal University of Uberlandia, School of Dentistry, Uberlândia, MG.

Published

2015-10-19

How to Cite

1.
Faria KO de, Silveira Júnior CD da, Silva Neto JP da, Mattos M da GC de, Silva MR da, Neves FD das. Comparison of methods to evaluate implant-abutment interface. Braz. J. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2015 Oct. 19 [cited 2022 Oct. 4];12(1):37-40. Available from: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641139

Issue

Section

Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)