Influence of two methods of additional activation on composite resins surface hardness

Authors

  • Alessandro Ribeiro Gonçalves Federal University of Piauí (UFPI)
  • Caroline de Deus Tupinambá Rodrigues Federal University of Piauí (UFPI)
  • Carlos Henrique de Carvalho e Souza Federal University of Piauí (UFPI)
  • Leilane Ferraz Moreira de Sousa Federal University of Piauí (UFPI)
  • Pedro Henrique de Souza Lopes Federal University of Piauí (UFPI)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v11i3.8641382

Keywords:

Polymerization, Composite resins, Hardness

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the influence of two methods of additional activation on the surface hardness of composite resins. Methods: Two types of composites were tested: Filtek P60 and Filtek P350. For each material, 48 specimens were prepared and divided into four groups: Group 1 (control) - conventional activation, using a halogen light for 40 s; Group 2 - conventional activation and additional activation with a halogen lamp for 60 s; Group 3 - conventional activation and additional activation with an autoclave at 127°C for 6 min at 1.7 kg/cm3 pressure; and Group 4 - conventional activation and additional activation with an autoclave at 134 °C for 15 min at 2.1 kg /cm3 pressure. The use of autoclave has been suggested for being a standard equipment at dental offices, and thus, even at locations far from dental laboratories, it would be possible to have simple techniques that allow access to indirect restorations at lower costs. Data obtained in the study were analyzed statistically by analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s test at a 5% level of significance. Results: For Z350, there was a significant increase in hardness for all groups of additional activation (Groups 2, 3 and 4), compared with the control group. For P60, a significant increase in surface hardness was found compared with the control group for the groups that used additional activation with an autoclave (Groups 3 and 4). Conclusions: Additional activation with an autoclave increased the surface hardness of the tested resins to a greater degree than additional activation with a halogen light.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Alessandro Ribeiro Gonçalves, Federal University of Piauí (UFPI)

PhD in Oral Rehabilitation – FOAR/UNESP, Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Piauí (UFPI), Teresina, PI.

Caroline de Deus Tupinambá Rodrigues, Federal University of Piauí (UFPI)

PhD in Restorative Dentistry – FOAR/UNESP, Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Piauí (UFPI), Teresina, PI.

Carlos Henrique de Carvalho e Souza, Federal University of Piauí (UFPI)

Dentistry Master’s Student, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Piauí (UFPI), Teresina, PI.

Leilane Ferraz Moreira de Sousa, Federal University of Piauí (UFPI)

Scientific Initiation Student, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Piauí (UFPI), Teresina, PI.

Pedro Henrique de Souza Lopes, Federal University of Piauí (UFPI)

Scientific Initiation Student, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Piauí (UFPI), Teresina, PI

Published

2015-10-27

How to Cite

1.
Gonçalves AR, Rodrigues C de DT, Souza CH de C e, Sousa LFM de, Lopes PH de S. Influence of two methods of additional activation on composite resins surface hardness. Braz. J. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2015 Oct. 27 [cited 2022 Nov. 30];11(3):396-400. Available from: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641382

Issue

Section

Article