Banner Portal
Fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Braces
Ceramics
Orthodontics
Biomechanics

How to Cite

1.
Manhães FR, Divino R, Lucato AS, Vedovello SAS, Correa C, Valdrigh HC. Fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain. Braz. J. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2015 Nov. 9 [cited 2024 Jul. 20];10(3):180-3. Available from: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641626

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the fracture strength of ceramic brackets submitted to archwire torsional strain. Methods: Different types of maxillary central incisor ceramic brackets from four different commercial brands, Roth prescription (0.022" x 0.028"), were evaluated, namely: Mystique (GAC), InVu (TP Orthodontics), Clarity (3M Unitek) and Luxi II (RMO Ortohodontics). To evaluate the fracture strength, 0.019"x 0.025" stainless steel orthodontic wires were inserted into the bracket channels and submitted to torsion until they fractured. Results: The InVu brackets showed a significantly higher fracture strength than the other brackets (p<0.05), which did not differ significantly among them (p>0.05). Conclusions: Among the brackets tested, the traditional ceramic bracket InVu showed the highest fracture strength, while the Luxi II bracket, obtained the lowest value.
https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v10i3.8641626
PDF (Português (Brasil))

The Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences uses the Creative Commons license (CC), thus preserving the integrity of the articles in an open access environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.