Banner Portal
Analysis of three disinfectants after immersion of irreversible hydrocolloid and ZOE paste impressions.
Remote

Keywords

Disinfection. Disinfectants. Dental impression materials

How to Cite

1.
Porta SRS, Gomes VL, Pavanin LA, Souza CCB. Analysis of three disinfectants after immersion of irreversible hydrocolloid and ZOE paste impressions. Braz. J. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2015 Nov. 26 [cited 2024 Apr. 19];5(18):1094-100. Available from: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8641909

Abstract

This investigation sought to analyze 3 disinfectants: 0.5% chlorhexidine, 2% glutaraldehyde, and 1% sodium hypochlorite after immersion of irreversible hydrocolloid and zinc oxide-eugenol paste impressions. Changes detected in the solutions could suggest alterations in the dental impressions, compromising their quality and negatively influencing treatment outcome. Forty-five irreversible hydrocolloid impressions (Jeltrate) made in aluminum stock impression trays (AG) as well as 45 irreversible hydrocolloid and 45 zinc oxide-eugenol paste (Horus) impressions made in auto polymerizing acrylic resin (AAR) trays (VipiFlash) were immediately immersed in 200mL of 0.5% chlorhexidine (Labfa), 2% glutaraldehyde (Glutaron II), or 1% sodium hypochlorite ( Miyako) solutions for 10, 30, and 60 minutes. After immersion the solutions were analyzed by visible ultraviolet spectroscopy and turbidimetry to verify possible alterations. Turbidimetry (registered in nephelometric turbidity units -NTU) results were subjected to Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests for statistical analysis (á=.05). An increase of absorption levels of all disinfectants was found after immersion of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. This increase was proportional to time of immersion and absorption was higher for 0.5% chlorhexidine for the 3 time periods analyzed. Only 1% sodium hypochlorite presented statistically significant alterations after immersion of zinc oxideeugenol paste impressions.
https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v5i18.8641909
Remote

References

Rowe AH, Forest JO. Dental impressions: the probability of contamination and a method of disinfection. Br Dent J. 1978; 145: 184-6.

Setcos JC; Peng L; Palenik CJ. The effect of disinfection procedures on an alginate impression material [abstract 582]. J Dent Res. 1984; 63: 235.

Bergman B, Bergman M, Olsson S. Alginate impression materials, dimensional stability and surface details sharpness following treatment with disinfectant solutions. Swed Dent J. 1985; 9: 255-62.

Minagi, S, Fukushima K, Maeda N, Satomi K, Ohkawa S, Akagawa Y et al. Disinfection method for impression materials: freedom from fear of hepatitis B and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. J Prosthet Dent. 1986; 56: 451-4.

Durr DP, Novak EV. Dimensional stability of alginate impressions immersed in disinfecting solutions. ASDC J Dent Child. 1987; 54: 45-8.

Rueggeberg FA, Beall FE, Kelly MT, Schuster GS. Sodium hypochlorite disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 67: 628-31.

Tan HK, Wolfaardt JF, Hooper PM, Busby B. Effects of disinfecting irreversible hydrocolloid impressions on the resultant gypsum casts. Part I – Surface quality. J Prosthet Dent. 1993; 69: 250-7.

Tan HK, Hooper PM, Buttar IA, Wolfaardt JF. Effects of disinfecting irreversible hydrocolloid impressions on the resultant gypsum casts. Part II – Dimensional changes. J Prosthet Dent. 1993; 70: 532-7.

Hilton TH, Schwartz RS, Bradley Jr DV. Immersion disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. Part 2: Effects on gypsum casts. Int J Prosthodont. 1994; 7: 424-33.

Johnson GH, Chellis KD, Gordon GE, Lepe X. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 79: 446-53.

Herrera SP, Merchant VA. Dimensional stability of dental impressions after immersion disinfection. J Am Dent Assoc. 1986; 113: 419-22.

Bergman B. Disinfection of prosthodontic impression materials: a literature review. Int J Prosthodont. 1989; 2: 537-42.

Blair FM, Wassell RW. A survey of the methods of disinfection of dental impressions used in dental hospitals in the United Kingdom. Br Dent J. 1996; 180: 369-75.

American dental association council on scientific affairs and American dental association council on dental practice: Infection control recommendations for the dental office and the dental laboratory. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996; 127: 672-80.

American dental association council on dental therapeutics; council on prosthetic services and dental laboratory relations: Guidelines for infection control in the dental office and commercial laboratory. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985; 110: 969-72.

American dental association council on dental materials and equipment: Disinfection of impressions. J Am Dent Assoc. 1991; 122: 110.

Merchant VA, Stone CR, Badr SE, Gleason MJ. Dimensional stability of disinfected zinc oxide eugenol impressions [Abstract]. J Dent Res. 1990; 69: 304.

Orchin M, Jaffe HH. Symmetry, orbitals and spectra (S. O. S.). New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1971. p. 1-20.

Colthup NB, Wimberley DSE. Introduction to infrared and raman spectroscopy. New York: Academic Press International; 1964. p. 1-35.

The Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences uses the Creative Commons license (CC), thus preserving the integrity of the articles in an open access environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.