Banner Portal
Influence of initial carious lesions on oral health planning


Epidemiology. Dental caries. Diagnosis

How to Cite

Assaf AV, Tengan C, Tagliaferro EP da S, Meneghim ZP, Meneghim M de C, Pereira AC, et al. Influence of initial carious lesions on oral health planning. Braz. J. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2016 Jan. 19 [cited 2024 Jul. 22];5(19):1217-22. Available from:


The aim of this cross-sectional study was to verify the importance of including initial carious lesions (IL) in the oral health planning of a public health service. The sample comprised 692 schoolchildren at the ages of 5 (n=171), 6 (n=203), 12 (n=236) and 15 (n=82), enrolled in state schools in Iracemapolis, SP, Brazil. Clinical examination was performed, using dental mirror and CPI (Community Periodontal Index) probe, after tooth brushing and drying. Two diagnostic thresholds were used for measuring the outcome: diagnostic threshold based on cavitated lesions and diagnostic threshold based on the inclusion of IL. The mean value for dmft was 1.56 for 5-year-olds and 1.98 for 6-yearolds. The mean value for DMFT was 1.19 for the age of 12 and 2.90 for the age of 15. The dmft and DMFT indexes increased significantly for all ages (paired t test, p<0.05) when IL was included in the examinations (29.59%, 12.25%, 21.71%, 26.82% for the ages of 5, 6, 12 and 15, respectively). The inclusion of IL in surveys generated a statistically significant percent increase in caries indexes for all age groups, contributing to obtain additional information for oral health planning in public services.


- Petersson HG, Bratthall D. The caries decline: a review of reviews. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996; 104: 436-43.

- Marthaler TM. Changes in dental caries 1953-2003. Caries Res. 2004; 38: 173-81.

- Pitts NB, Fyffe HE. The effect of varying diagnostic thresholds upon clinical caries data for a low prevalence group. J Dent Res. 1988; 67: 592-6.

- Pitts NB, Longbottom C. Preventive Care Advised (PCA)/ Operative Care Advised (OCA) – categorizing caries by the management option. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1995; 23: 55-9.

- Ismail AI. Clinical diagnosis of precavitated carious lesions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997; 25: 13-23.

- Pitts NB. Diagnostic tools and measurements-impact on appropriate care. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997; 25: 24-35.

- Warren JJ, Steven ML, Kanellis MJ. Dental caries in the primary dentition: assessing prevalence of cavitated and non-cavitated lesions. J Publ Health Dent. 2002; 62:109-14.

- World Health Organization. Oral health surveys: basic methods.

ed. Geneva: WHO; 1997.

- Sköld UM Klock B, Rasmusson CG, Torstensson T. Is caries prevalence underestimated in today’s caries examination? A study on 16-year-old children in the county of Bohuslan, Sweden. Swed Dent J. 1995; 19: 213-7.

- Amarante, E, Raadal M, Espelid I. Impact of diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of dental caries in Norwegian children aged 5, 12 and 18 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1998; 26: 87-94.

- IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística [Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics] [cited 2005 Jun]. Available from:

- Kozlowski FC. Relação entre o fator socioeconômico e a prevalência e severidade de fluorose e cárie dentária [dissertation]. Piracicaba: Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade Estadual de Campinas; 2001.

- Nyvad B, Machiulskiene V, Baelum V. Reliability of a new caries diagnostic system differentiating between active and inactive caries lesions. Caries Res. 1999; 33: 252-60.

- Fyffe HE, Deery C, Nugent ZJ, Nuttall NM, Pitts NB. Effect of diagnostic threshold on the validity and reliability of epidemiological caries diagnosis using the Dundee Selectable Threshold Method for caries diagnosis (DSTM). Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2000; 28:42-51.

- Ismail A. Diagnostic levels in dental public health planning. Caries Res. 2004; 38: 199-203.

- Pitts NB. Modern concepts of caries measurement. J Dent Res. 2004; 83(Spec Issue C): 43-7.

- Assaf AV, Meneghim MC, Zanin L, Mialhe FL, Pereira AC, Ambrosano GMB. Assessment of different methods for diagnosing dental caries in epidemiological surveys. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004; 32: 418-25.

- Rimmer PA, Pitts NB. Effects of diagnostic threshold and overlapped approximal surfaces on reported caries status. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1991; 19: 205-12.

- Deery C, Care R, Chesters R, Huntington E, Stelmachonoka S, Gudkina Y. Prevalence of dental caries in Latvian 11- to 15- year-Old children and the enhanced diagnostic yield of temporary tooth separation, FOTI and electronic caries measurement. Caries Res. 2000; 34: 2-7.

- Forgie AH, Paterson M, Pine CM, Pitts NB, Nugent ZJ. A randomized controlled trial of the caries-preventive efficacy of a chlorhexidine-containing varnish in high-caries-risk adolescents. Caries Res. 2000; 34: 432-9.

- Chesters RK, Pitts NB, Matuliene G, Kvedariene A, Huntington E, Bendinskaite R et al. An abbreviated caries clinical trial design validated over 24 months. J Dent Res. 2002; 81: 637-40.

- Forgie AH, Pine CM, Longbottom C, Pitts NB. The use of magnification in general dental practice in Scotland-a survey report. J Dent. 1999; 27: 497-502.

The Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences uses the Creative Commons license (CC), thus preserving the integrity of the articles in an open access environment.


Download data is not yet available.