Banner Portal
Effect of salivary contamination at different steps of the bonding process on the microleakage around Class V restorations
Remote

Keywords

Dentin bonding agents. Saliva. Dental leakage

How to Cite

1.
Rosa CB, Cavalcanti AN, Fontes CM, Mathias P. Effect of salivary contamination at different steps of the bonding process on the microleakage around Class V restorations. Braz. J. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2016 Jan. 22 [cited 2024 Jun. 25];6(23):1445-9. Available from: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8643011

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the influence of the moment of salivary contamination during the bonding procedure (before or after acid conditioning) on the microleakage around composite resin restorations. Sixty bovine incisors received two Class V preparations (one with dentin margins and other with enamel margins). Teeth were randomly assigned into three groups (n=20): 1) control (not contaminated); 2) salivary contamination before etching with 34% phosphoric acid; and, 3) salivary contamination after acid etching. Cavities were restored using Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply) adhesive system and TPH Spectrum (Dentsply) composite according to manufacturer instructions. Teeth were thermocycled (500x, 5-55°C, 60s/bath), immersed in 2% methylene blue buffered solution (pH 7.0), and sectioned into two halves. Three examiners measured the extent of dye penetration on dentin and enamel margins in a stereoscope microscope, using four representative scores. Statistical analysis were performed with Kruskal-Wallis/Wilcoxon tests (α=5%). The results showed that enamel and dentin margins did not present significant differences (p>0.05). However, significantly higher dye penetration was observed on substrates etched and further contaminated with saliva. It was concluded that salivary contamination after acid etching increases the microleakage around composite resin restorations, especially at dentin margins. However, acid etching subsequent to the contamination can avoid negative effects on restorations margins.
https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v6i23.8643011
Remote

References

Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrechts P et al. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J. 2005; 24: 1-13.

Civelek A, Ersoy M, L’Hotelier E, Soyman M, Say EC. Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage in Class II cavities of various resin composites. Oper Dent. 2003; 28: 635-41.

Besnault C, Attal JP. Influence of a simulated oral environment on microleakage of two adhesive systems in Class II composite restorations. J Dent. 2002; 30: 1-6.

Spencer P, Wang Y, Bohaty B. Interfacial chemistry of moistureaged class II composite restorations. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006; 77: 234-40.

Council on Scientific Affairs ADA. Direct and indirect restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003; 134: 463-72.

Soldani F, Foley J. An assessment of rubber dam usage amongst specialists in paediatric dentistry practising within the UK. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007; 17: 50-6.

Fernandes AS, Rodrigues S, Singhal K, Murthi MS. Assessment of chair side techniques for composite resin restoration—a survey. Indian J Dent Res. 2003; 14: 47-56.

Taskonak B, Sertgoz A. Shear bond strengths of saliva contaminated ‘one-bottle’ adhesives. J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29: 559-64.

Eiriksson SO, Pereira PN, Swift EJ, Jr., Heymann HO, Sigurdsson A. Effects of saliva contamination on resin-resin bond strength. Dent Mater. 2004; 20: 37-44.

Hiraishi N, Kitasako Y, Nikaido T, Nomura S, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Effect of artificial saliva contamination on pH value change and dentin bond strength. Dent Mater. 2003; 19: 429-34.

Park JW, Lee KC. The influence of salivary contamination on shear bond strength of dentin adhesive systems. Oper Dent. 2004; 29: 437-42.

Yoo HM, Oh TS, Pereira PN. Effect of saliva contamination on the microshear bond strength of one-step self-etching adhesive systems to dentin. Oper Dent. 2006; 31: 127-34.

Hitmi L, Attal JP, Degrange M. Influence of the time-point of salivary contamination on dentin shear bond strength of 3 dentin adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent. 1999; 1: 219-32.

Reis AF, Giannini M, Kavaguchi A, Soares CJ, Line SR. Comparison of microtensile bond strength to enamel and dentin of human, bovine, and porcine teeth. J Adhes Dent. 2004; 6: 117-21.

Eiriksson SO, Pereira PN, Swift EJ, Heymann HO, Sigurdsson A. Effects of blood contamination on resin-resin bond strength. Dent Mater. 2004; 20: 184-90.

Toledano M, Osorio R, Ceballos L, Fuentes MV, Fernandes CA, Tay FR et al. Microtensile bond strength of several adhesive systems to different dentin depths. Am J Dent. 2003; 16: 292-8.

The Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences uses the Creative Commons license (CC), thus preserving the integrity of the articles in an open access environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.