Banner Portal
Shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded with four different composite resins
Remote

Keywords

Composite. Orthodontic brackets. Dental bonding

How to Cite

1.
Romano FL, Correr-Sobrinho L, Nouer DF, Correr AB, Sinhoreti MAC, Magnani MBB de A. Shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded with four different composite resins. Braz. J. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2016 Jan. 22 [cited 2024 Apr. 20];6(23):1457-61. Available from: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8643013

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the shear bond strength of metallic brackets with different types of Concise composites and the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). Sixty bovine permanent lower incisors were inserted into PVC tubes and divided into four groups (n = 15): Group 1 – Transbond XT (control) composite; Group 2 – Concise restorative composite; Group 3 – Concise diluted restorative composite (Artun and Zachrisson’s technique); and Group 4 – Concise Orthodontic composite. After bonding the brackets, the samples were stored in distilled water at 37o C for 24 hours and then submitted to shear strength tests (Instron) at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Analysis of variance and Tukey’s test (5%) were used for statistically analysing the data regarding the shear bond strength results, whereas Kruskal-Wallis test was used for analysing the ARI scores. The shear bond strength mean values (MPa) for Group 1 (12.13) and Group 2 (12.20) were found to be statistically higher (p < .05) than that for Group 3 (8.20). No statistically significant differences were observed (p > .05) between Groups 1, 2, and 4 (9.86) as well as between Groups 3 and 4. Regarding the ARI evaluation, the majority of the fractures involved the bracket/ composite interface
https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v6i23.8643013
Remote

References

Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955; 34: 849-53.

Bishara SE, Thunyaudom T, Chan D. The effect of temperature change of composites on the bonding strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988; 94: 440-7.

Bishara SE, Olsen ME, Damon P, Jakobsen JR. Evaluation of a new light-cured orthodontic bonding adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 114: 80-7.

Bishara SE, VonWald L, Olsen ME, Laffoon JF. Effect of time on the shear bond strength of glass ionomer and composite orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 116: 616-20.

Newman G. Epoxy adhesives for orthodontic attachments: progress report. Am J Orthod. 1965; 51: 901-12.

Tortamano A, Vigorito JW, Nauff F, Garone GM, Santos RSC. Avaliação da resistência à tração de agentes cimentantes para bráquetes ortodônticos. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent. 2002; 56: 259-63.

Correr Sobrinho L, Consani S, Sinhoreti MAC, Correr GM, Consani RLX. Evaluation of shear bond strengths of bracket bonding using different materials. Rev ABO Nac. 2001; 9: 157-62.

Fajen VB, Duncanson jr MG, Nanda RS, Currier GF, Angolkar PV. An in vitro evaluation of bond strength of three glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990; 97: 316-22.

Meng CL, Li CH, Wang WN. Bond strength with APF applied after acid etching. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 114: 510-3.

Orthendahl T, Thilander B. Use o glass-ionomer for bracket bonding – an ex vivo study evaluating a testing device for in vivo purposes. Eur J Orthod. 1998; 20: 201-8.

Romano FL, Ruellas ACO. Estudo comparativo in vitro da resistência ao cisalhamento da colagem e o Índice de remanescente de adesivo entre os compósitos Concise e Superbond. R Dental Press Ortodon Ortop Facial. 2003; 8: 69- 75.

Gorelik L. Bonding metal brackets with a self-polymerizing sealant-composite: A 12-month assesment. Am J Orthod. 1977; 75: 542-53.

Artun J, Zachrisson B. Improving the handling properties of a composite resin for direct bonding. Am J Orthod. 1982; 81: 269-76.

Cordeiro AC, Brussadori SK, Camargo MCF. Colagem de bráquetes com cimento de ionômero de vidro modificado por resina. Rev Paul Odontol. 1999; 21: 10-5.

Correr Sobrinho L, Correr GM, Consani S, Sinhoreti MAC, Consani RLX. Influência do tempo pós-fixação na resistência ao cisalhamento de bráquetes colados com diferentes materiais.

Pesqui Odont Bras. 2002; 16: 43-9.

Grandhi RK, Combe EC, Speidel TM. Shear bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets with a moisture-insensitive primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119: 251-5.

Santos PCF, Santos JFF, Vigorito JW, Miranda Júnior WG. Avaliação da capacidade de retenção de braquetes cerâmicos e metálicos colados em ambiente úmido. Ortodontia. 2000; 33: 21-34.

Souza CS, Francisconi PAS, Araújo PA. Resistências de união de cinco cimentos utilizados em Ortodontia. Rev FOB. 1999; 7: 15-21.

Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984; 85: 333-340.

Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod 1975; 2: 171-78.

The Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences uses the Creative Commons license (CC), thus preserving the integrity of the articles in an open access environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.