Banner Portal
Bond strength evaluation of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems on intact and ground human enamel
Remote

Keywords

Dental enamel. Dentin-bonding agents. Tensile strength

How to Cite

1.
Di Francescantonio M, Oliveira MT, Shinohara MS, Ambrosano GMB, Giannini M. Bond strength evaluation of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems on intact and ground human enamel. Braz. J. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2016 Jan. 22 [cited 2024 May 30];6(23):1462-6. Available from: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8643014

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength of adhesive systems to intact and ground enamel. Enamel blocks from buccal and lingual surfaces of third molars were used for bonding procedures. Intact or ground (600-grit SiC paper) enamel surfaces were bonded using two “etch&rinse” adhesives (Prime&Bond 2.1 and Single Bond), three self-etching primer systems (Optibond Solo Plus SE; Tyrian SPE/One-Step Plus and UniFil Bond) or two self-etching adhesives (One-Up Bond F and Xeno III). A 6-mm composite crown was built on the bonded surfaces and samples were stored for 24 hs at 37o C. Samples were sectioned into 0.9-mm-thick slabs, each slab trimmed to a cross-sectional area of 0.8 mm2 and specimens loaded to failure at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min, using a universal testing machine. Microtensile bond strength data (n=6) were analyzed using KruskalWallis and Dunn tests. Differences in bond strength between intact and ground surfaces were not significant for both “etch&rinse” adhesives, Tyrian SPE/One-Step Plus, UniFil Bond and Xeno III systems. The enamel surface preparation resulted in higher bond strength for Optibond Solo Plus SE and One-Up Bond F systems. Enamel preparation using 600-grit SiC paper is unlikely to affect resin-enamel bond strengths.
https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v6i23.8643014
Remote

References

Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P et al. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: currents status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003; 28: 215-35.

De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005; 84: 118-32.

Hannig M, Grafe A, Atalay S, Bott B, Microleakage and SEM evaluation of fissure sealants placed by use of self-etching priming agents. J Dent. 2003; 32: 75-81.

Kaaden C, Powers JM, Friedl KH, Schmalz G. Bond strength of self-etching adhesives to dental hard tissues. Clin Oral Invest. 2002; 6: 155-60.

Miyazaki M, Sato H, Onose H, Moore BK, Platt JA. Analysis of the enamel/adhesive resin interface with laser Raman Microscopy. Oper Dent. 2003; 28: 136-42.

Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives Part II: etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater. 2001; 17: 430-44.

Kanemura N, Sano H, Tagami J. Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dent. 1999; 27: 523-30.

Miyazaki M, Hinoura K, Honjo G, Onose H. Effect of self-etching primer application method on enamel bond strength. Am J Dent. 2002; 15: 412-6.

Torii Y, Itou K, Hikasa R, Iwata S, Nishitani Y. Enamel tensile bond strength and morphology of resin-enamel interface created by acid etching system with or without moisture and self-etching priming system. J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29: 528-33.

Shinohara MS, Oliveira MT, Di Hipólito V, Giannini M, De Goes SEM analysis of the acid-etched enamel patterns promoted by acidic monomers and phosphoric acids. J Appl Oral Sci. 2006; 14: 427-35 11. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE. Evaluation of adhesive systems using acidic monomer. Am J Dent. 1997; 10: 219-23.

Hayakawa T, Kikutake K, Nemoto K. Influence of self-etching primer treatment on the adhesion of resin composite to polished dentin and enamel. Dent Mater. 1998; 14: 99-105.

Perdigão J, Geraldeli S. Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2003; 15: 32-41.

Daronch M, De Goes MF, Grande RHM, Chan DCN. Antibacterial and conventional self-etching primer system: morphological evaluation of intact primary enamel. J Clin Pediatric Dent. 2003; 27: 251-6.

Dias WR, Pereira PN, Swift EJ Jr. Effect of surface preparation on microtensile bond strength of three adhesive systems to bovine enamel. J Adhes Dent. 2004; 6: 279-85.

Chaves P, Giannini M, Ambrosano GMB. Influence of smear pretreatments on bond strength. J Adhes Dent. 2002; 4: 191-6.

Miyazaki M, Sato M, Onose H. Durability of enamel bond strength of simplified bonding systems. Oper Dent. 2000; 25: 75-80.

Hannig M, Bock H, Bott B, Hoth-Hannig W. Inter-crystallite nanoretention of self-etching adhesives at enamel imaged by transmission electron microscopy. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002: 110: 464-70.

Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effects of regional enamel and prism orientation on resin bonding. Oper Dent. 2003; 28: 20-7.

Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Yoshida E, Hori M, Sano H, Kaga M, et al. H. Resin-enamel bonds made with self-etching primers on ground enamel. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003; 111: 447-53.

Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Short- and long-term bonding efficacy of a self-etching, one-step adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2003; 5: 41-5.

Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Mattar D, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P. Microtensile bond strengths of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Oper Dent. 2003; 28: 647-60.

Poole DFG, Johnson NW. The effect of different demineralizing agent on enamel surface studies by scanning electron microscopy. Arch Oral Biol. 1967; 12: 1621-34.

The Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences uses the Creative Commons license (CC), thus preserving the integrity of the articles in an open access environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.