Banner Portal
Surface change assessment of Co-Cr alloy subjected to immersion in denture cleansers
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Dental alloys. Chromium alloys. Denture cleansers. Sodium hypochlorite.

How to Cite

1.
Borsa PCC, Marquezan M, May LG, Braun KO. Surface change assessment of Co-Cr alloy subjected to immersion in denture cleansers. Braz. J. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2017 Aug. 11 [cited 2023 Sep. 30];15(3):196-200. Available from: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8649980

Abstract

Choosing the right chemical cleanser for removable partial dentures is a challenge, because they present an acrylic and a metallic portion, which should be cleaned and not damaged. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess surface changes of cobalt chromium alloys immersed in diferente cleaners solutions: 0.05% sodium hypochlorite, 4.2% acetic acid, 0.05% sodium salicylate, sodium perborate (Corega Tabs®) and 0.2% peracetic acid. Material and Methods: One hundred and twenty circular specimens (10 mm in diameter) of two commercial available Co-Cr alloys were tested: GM 800 ® (Dentaurum) and Co-Cr® (DeguDent). The samples were randomly divided into tem experimental groups (n=10), according to the trend mark of alloy and cleaners solutions in which they were immersed, and two control groups, in which the samples of the two alloys were immersed in distilled water. Evaluations were performed through roughness measurement (rugosimeter Surftest 211, Mitutoyo), visual evaluation with stereomicroscope (Stereo Discovery 20, Carl Zeiss) and scanning electron microscope surface (JSM, 6360 SEM, JEOL), at experimental times T0 – before immersions, T1 - after one immersion, and T2 - after 90 immersions. Intergroup comparison for the effect of immersion in the different cleanser agents was evaluated through ANOVA/Tukey tests (p≤0.05). The effect of the time in the immersion of each alloy was evaluated by t-pared test (p≤0.05). The two alloys were compared using the t-Student test. Results: The analysis of roughness and microscopy showed that surface changes were significantly greater in groups submitted to 0.05% sodium hypochlorite after 90 immersions (T2). When comparing the two alloys, a similar behavior of roughness was observed for the cleaning agents. However, alloy GM 800® showed significant statistical difference for roughness variations in experimental times (Δ1 and Δ2), when immersed in sodium 0.05% hypochlorite. The number of exposures of the alloys to the cleaning agents showed a negative influence when using sodium hypochlorite solution. Conclusions: It is possible to conclude that 0.05% sodium hypochlorite has caused the greatest apparent damage to alloy surface.

https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v15i3.8649980
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

Sesma N, Takada KS, Laganá DC, Jaeger RG, Azambuja Jr N. Eficiência de métodos caseiros de higienização e limpeza de próteses parciais removíveis. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent. 1999;53:463-68.

Budtz-Jorgensen E. Materials and methods for cleaning dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1979 Dec;42(6):619-23.

Dills SS, Olshan AM, Goldner S, Brogdon C. Comparison of the antimicrobial capability of an abrasive paste and chemical-soak denture cleaners. J Prosthet Dent. 1988 Oct;60(4):467-70.

Kulak Y, Arikan A, Albak S, Okar I, Kazazoglu E. Scanning electron microscopic examination of different cleaners: surface contaminant removal from dentures. J Oral Rehabil. 1997 Mar;24(3):209-15.

Nikawa H, Jin C, Makihira S, Egusa H, Hamada T, Kumagai H. Biofilm formation of Candida albicans on the surfaces of deteriorated soft denture lining materials caused by denture cleansers in vitro. J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Mar;30(3):243-50.

Barnabe W, de Mendonca Neto T, Pimenta FC, Pegoraro LF, Scolaro JM. Efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and coconut soap used as disinfecting agents in the reduction of denture stomatitis, Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. J Oral Rehabil. 2004 May;31(5):453-9.

Paranhos HF, Silva-Lovato CH, Souza RF, Cruz PC, Freitas KM, Peracini A. Effects of mechanical and chemical methods on denture biofilm accumulation. J Oral Rehabil. 2007 Aug;34(8):606-12.

de Freitas Fernandes FS, Pereira-Cenci T, da Silva WJ, Filho AP, Straioto FG, Del Bel Cury AA. Efficacy of denture cleansers on Candida spp. biofilm formed on polyamide and polymethyl methacrylate resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Jan;105(1):51-8. doi: 10.1016/S00223913(10)60192-8.

Chassot AL, Poisl MI, Samuel SM. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of the efficacy of a peracetic acid-based disinfectant for decontamination of acrylic resins. Braz Dent J. 2006;17(2):117-21.

Svidzinski AE, I. P, Pádua RAF, Tavares TR, Svidzinski TIE. Eficiência do ácido peracético no controle de Staphylococcus aureus meticilina resistente. Cienc Cuidado Saude. 2007;6:312-8.

Shay K. Denture hygiene: a review and update. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2000 Feb 15;1(2):28-41.

Geurtsen W. Biocompatibility of dental casting alloys. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2002;13(1):71-84.

Kastner C, Svare CW, Scandrett FR, Kerber PE, Taylor TD, Semler HE. Effects of chemical denture cleaners on the flexibility of cast clasps. J Prosthet Dent. 1983 Oct;50(4):473-9.

Keyf F, Gungor T. Comparison of effects of bleach and cleansing tablet on reflectance and surface changes of a dental alloy used for removable partial dentures. J Biomater Appl. 2003 Jul;18(1):5-14.

Chau VB, Saunders TR, Pimsler M, Elfring DR. In-depth disinfection of acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Sep;74(3):309-13.

da Silva FC, Kimpara ET, Mancini MN, Balducci I, Jorge AO, Koga-Ito CY. Effectiveness of six different disinfectants on removing five microbial species and effects on the topographic characteristics of acrylic resin. J Prosthodont. 2008 Dec;17(8):627-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1532849X.2008.00358.x.

Guidelines for infection control in the dental office and the commercial dental laboratory. Council on Dental Therapeutics. Council on Prosthetic Services and Dental Laboratory Relations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985 Jun;110(6):969-72.

Upadhyaya D, Panchal MA, R.S. D, Srivastava VK. Corrosion of alloys used in dentistry: a review. Mater Sci Engin. 2006;432(1-2):1-11.

de Sousa LL, de Felipe Hd, Codaro EN, Nakazato RZ. Electrochemical and microstructural study of Ni-Cr-Mo alloys used in dental prosthesis after different remelting processes. Corros Proteccao Mater. 2010;29(2):42-8.

Rincic N, Baucic I, Miko S, Papic M, Prohic E. Corrosion behaviour of the Co-Cr-Mo dental alloy in solutions of different composition and different pH values. Coll Antropol. 2003;27 Suppl 2:99-106.

Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997 Jul;13(4):258-69.

Felipucci DN, Davi LR, Paranhos HF, Bezzon OL, Silva RF, Barbosa Junior F, et al. Effect of different cleansers on the weight and ion release of removable partial denture: an in vitro study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011 Oct;19(5):483-7.

de Sousa Porta SR, de Lucena-Ferreira SC, da Silva WJ, Del Bel Cury AA. Evaluation of sodium hypochlorite as a denture cleanser: a clinical study. Gerodontology. 2015 Dec;32(4):260-6. doi: 10.1111/ger.12104.

Papadopoulos T, Polyzois G, Tapanli A, Frangou M. The effect of disinfecting solutions on bending properties and weight changes of Co-Cr and Ti-6Al-7Nb alloys for dentures. Odontology. 2011 Jan;99(1):77-82. doi: 10.1007/s10266-010-0135-2.

McGowan MJ, Shimoda LM, Woolsey GD. Effects of sodium hypochlorite on denture base metals during immersion for short-term sterilization. J Prosthet Dent. 1988 Aug;60(2):212-8.

Schalch MV, Adabo GL, Souza RF, Fonseca RG, Cruz CAS. Corrosion resistance of dental alloys submitted to disinfection. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2004;33(3):143-8.

The Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences uses the Creative Commons license (CC), thus preserving the integrity of the articles in an open access environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...