Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Introduction: Most of the instruments used in Brazil to diagnose Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD) were developed in another Language. To effectively use instruments that were created in another language, it must be translated into the relevant target language before cross-cultural adaptation. Clinimetric tests should also be performed. Measurement properties consist of quality criteria related to evaluation instruments. These criteria are necessary to determine the quality of the instruments used in Brazil. Objectives: The aim of the present systematic review was to assess the quality of the measurement properties of instruments utilized to diagnose TMD. Methods: Systematic searches were performed of the PUBMED, SCIELO, LILACS and SCIENCE DIRECT databases. Studies addressing questionnaires translated and cross-culturally adapted for use in Brazil were retrieved and the quality of the measurement properties was analyzed using the COSMIN checklist. Results: In the 11 eligible articles, 10 instruments were identified. The studies were evaluated based on their analysis of structural validity, internal consistency, reproducibility (concordance and reliability), responsiveness, ceiling effect and floor effect. None the assessment tools had all its measurement properties tested. Conclusion: The measurement properties of the instruments were not completely tested. Thus, care must be taken when interpreting the scores of these questionnaires.References
Dworkin Sf, Hunggins Kh, LeResche L, Von Korff M, Howard J, Truelove E, et al. Epidemiology of signs and symptoms in temporomandibular disorders: clinical sings in cases and controls. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990 Mar;120(3):273-81.
Fonseca DM, Bonfate G, Valle AL, Freitas SFT. [Diagnosis of the craniomandibular disfunction through anamnesis]. RGO. 1994;42(1):238. Portuguese.
Helkimo M. Studies on function and dysfunction of the mastigatory system, II: índex for anamnestic and clinical disfunction and occlusal state. Sven Tandlak Tidskr. 1974 Mar;67(2):101-21.
Fricton JR, Schiffman EL. The craniomandibular index: validity. J Prosthet Dent. 1987 Aug;58(2):222-8.
Pehling J, Schiffman E, Look J, Shaefer J, Lenton P, Fricton J. Interexaminer reliability and clinical validity of the temporomandibular index: a new outcome measure for temporomandibular disorders. J Orofac Pain. 2002 Fall;16(4):296-304.
Truelove El, Sommers Ee, Leresche L, Dworkin Sf, Von Korff M. Clinical diagnostic criteria for TMD: new classification permits multiple diagnoses. J Am Dent Assoc. 1992 Apr;123(4):47-54. 7. Dworkin SF, Leresche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord. 1992 Fall;6(4):301-55.
Keszei A, Novak M, Streiner DL. Introduction to health measurement scales. J Psychosom Res. 2010 Apr;68(4):319-23. doi: 10.1016/j. jpsychores.2010.01.006.
Cano SJ, Hobart JC, Fitzpatrick R, Bhatia K, Thomp¬son AJ, Warner TT. Patient-based outcomes of cervical dystonia: a review of rating scales. Mov Disord. 2004 Sep; 19(9):1054-9.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, et al. Protocol of the COSMIN study: COnsensus‐based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Jan;6:2.
Mokkink LB, Terwee Bb, Gibbons E, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, Knol DL, Bouter LM, De Vet HCW. Inter‐rater reliability of the COSMIN (COnsensus‐based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) checklist. BMC Research Methodology. 2010;10:82.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):539-49. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Mar 18;10:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-22.
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. International consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health‐related patient‐reported outcomes: results of the COSMIN study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Jul;63(7):737-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006.
Lucena LBS, Kosminsky M, Costa LJ, Góes PSA. Validation of the Portuguese version of the RDC/TMD Axis II questionnaire. Braz Oral Res.2006 Oct-Dec;20(4):312-7.
Campos JADB, Carrascosa AC, Loffredo LCM, Faria JB. [Internal consistency and reproducibility of Portuguese version of research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD-Axis II)]. Rev Bras Fisioter 2007 Nov-Dec;11(6):451-9. Portuguese.
Cavalcanti RF, Studart LM, Kosminsky M, Goes PSA. Validation of the multimedia version of the RDC/TMD axis II questionnaire in Portuguese. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 May-Jun;18(3):231-6.
Campos JADB, Carrascosa AC, Maroco J. Validity and reability of the Portuguese version of Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire. 2012 May;39(5):377-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02276.x.
Campos JADB, Gonçalves DAG, Camparis CM, Speciali JG. Reliability of a questionnaire for diagnosing the severity of temporomandibular disorder. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2009;13(1):38-43.
Ferreira-Bacci AV. Mazzetto MO, Fukusima SS. [Adaptation of CR10 to Portuguese language for measuring pain in temporomandibular dysfunctions]. Rev Bras Odontol. 2009 Jan-Jun;66(1):16-21. Portuguese.
Campos JA, Carrascosa AC, Bonafé FS, Maroco J. Severity of temporomandibular disorders in womem: validity and reliability of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index. Braz Oral Res. 2014;28:16-21.
Pinelli C, Loffredo LCM. Reproducibility and validity of self-perceived oral health conditions. Clin Oral Investig. 2007 Dec;11(4):431-7.
Kallás MS, Crosato EM, Biazevic MGH, Mori M, Aggarwal VR. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of Manchester Orofacial Pain Disability Scale. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2013 Jan 1;3(4):e3. doi: 10.5037/ jomr.2012.3403.
Manfredi APS, Da Silva AA, Vendite LL. [The sensibility appreciation of the questionnaire for selection of orofacial pain and temporomandibular disorders recommended by the American Academy of Orofacial Pain]. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol. 2001 Nov-Dec;67(6):763-8. Portuguese.
Franco-Micheloni AL, Fernandes G, Gonçalves DAG, Camparis CM. Temporomandibular disorders among Brazilian adolescents: reliability and validity of a screening questionnaire. J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 JulAug;22(4):314-22.
Terwee CB, Bot SD, De Boer MR, Van Der Windt DA, Knol Dl Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for mensurement of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42.
Krebs DE. Declare your ICC type. Phys Ther. 1986 Sep;66(9):1431.
Costa LCM, Maher CG, McAuley JH, Costa LO. Systematic review of cross-cultural adaptations of McGill Pain Questionnaire reveals a paucity of clinimetric testing. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Sep;62(9):934-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.019.
Costa LO, Maher CG, Latimer J. Self-report outcome measures for low back pain: searching for international cross-cultural adaptations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Apr 20;32(9):1028-37.
Bot SD, Terwee CB, Van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Dekker J, de Vet HC. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Apr;63(4):335-41.
The Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences uses the Creative Commons license (CC), thus preserving the integrity of the articles in an open access environment.
Downloads
