Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to verify the microshear bond strength of conventional and self-adhesive resin cements to feldsphatic ceramic. Methods: Twenty discs of Starlight ceramic (Degudent) were made (15mm x 2mm). The bonding procedure was accomplished by insertion of resin cements into tubes of 0.7mm internal diameter in contact with the ceramic. The resin cements used were: RelyX ARC (3M Espe), Panavia F (Kuraray), RelyX Unicem (3M Espe) and seT (SDI). Total of six tubes of each material on each ceramic disc. The specimens were tested for microshear in a universal testing machine, 24hours and 6months after bonding procedure. Values of microshear bonding strength (MPa) were subjected to ANOVA and Fisher PLSD test (p<0.05). Results: For 24hours analysis, RelyX ARC showed the highest microshear bonding strength without statistical difference to RelyX Unicem and seT. Panavia F showed the lowest values of microshear bonding strength in both periods. In the analysis after 6months there was a significant increase in the microshear bonding strength values for all cements compared to 24hours. Only for RelyX ARC, the increase was not statistically significant. Conclusion: In conclusion, the bond strength depends mainly on the type of resin cement used, and the self-adhesive cements behave similarly to conventional resin cement.References
Seemann R, Flury S, Pfefferkornb F, Lussia A, Noackc MJ. Restorative dentistry and restorative materials over the next 20 years: A Delphi survey. Dent Mater. 2014 Apr; 30(4):442-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.01.013.
Nayar S, Aruna U, Bhat WM. Enhanced aesthetics with all ceramics restoration. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Apr;7(Suppl 1):S282–4. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.155957.
Kim RJ, Woo JS, Lee IB, Yi YA, Hwang JY, Seo DG. Performance of universal adhesives on bonding to leucite-reinforced ceramic. Biomater Res. 2015 May;19:11. doi: 10.1186/s40824-015-0035-1.
Kuguimiya RN, Rode KM, Carneiro PM, Aranha AC, Turbino ML. Influence of Curing Units and Indirect Restorative Materials on the Hardness of Two Dual-curing Resin Cements Evaluated by the Nanoindentation Test. J Adhes Dent. 2015 Jun;17(3):243-8. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a34399.
Tian T, Tsoi JK, Matinlinna JP, Burrow MF. Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater. 2014 Jul;30(7):e147-62. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.01.017.
Pavan S, dos Santos PH, Berger S, Bedran-Russo AK. The effect of dentin pretreatment on the microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Oct;104(4):258-64. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60134-5.
Leite FP, Özcan M, Valandro LF, Moreira CH, Amaral R, Bottino MA et al. Effect of the etching duration and ultrasonic cleaning on microtensile bond strength between feldspathic ceramic and resin cement. J Adhes. 2013:89(3):159-73.
Bellan MC, Cunha PFJSD, Tavares JG, Spohr AM, Mota EG. Microtensile bond strength of CAD/CAM materials to dentin under different adhesive strategies. Braz Oral Res. 2017 Dec 18;31:e109. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.
Reich SM, Wichmann M, Frankenberger R, Zajc D. Effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of three resin cements to a machinable feldspatic ceramic. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005 Aug;74(2):740-6.
Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Ikeda T, Van Landuyt K, Maida T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater. 2007 Jan;23(1):71-80.
Gilbert S, Keul C, Roos M, Edelhoff D, Stawarczyk B. Bonding between CAD/CAM resin and resin composite cements dependent on bonding agents: three different in vitro test methods. Clin Oral Invest. 2015 Mar;20(2):227-36. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1494-4.
Della Bona A, Anusavice KJ, Shen C. Microtensile strength of composite bonded to Hot-pressed Ceramics. J Adhes Dent. 2000 Winter;2(4):305-13.
Lu R, Harcourt JK, Tyas MJ, Alexander B. An investigation of composite resin/porcelain interface. Aust Dent J. 1992 Feb; 37(1):12-9.
Fonseca AS, Mizrahi J, Menezes LR, Valente LL, de Moraes RR, Schneider LF. The effect of time between handling and photoactivation on self-adhesive resin cement properties. J Prosthodont. 2014 Jun;23(4):302-7. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12108.
Jardel V, Degrange M, Picard B, Derrien G. Surface energy of etched ceramic. Int J Prosthodont. 1999 Sep-Oct;12(5):415-8.
Kern M, Thompson VP. Bonding to glass infiltrated alumina ceramic: adhesive methods and their durability. J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Mar;73(3):240-9.
Fabiao MM, Stape TH, Yanikian CR, de Lima AF, Pizi EC, Baron GM, et al. Influence of different adhesive protocols on ceramic bond strength and degree of conversion of resin cements. Int J Adhes Adhesives. 2015 Oct;62:7-13.
Suzuki TY, Godas AL, Guedes AP, Catelan A, Pavan S, Briso AL, et al. Microtensile bond strength of resin cements to caries-affected dentin. J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Jul; 110(1):47-55. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60339-X.
Aksornmuang J, Nakajima M, Foxton R, Tagami J. Mechanical properties and bond strength of dual-cure resin composites to root canal dentin. Dent Mater. 2007 Feb;23(2):226-34.
Moraes RR, Brandt WC, Naves LZ, Sobrinho LC, Piva E. Light-and time-dependent polymerization of dual-cured resin luting agent beneath ceramic. Acta Odontol Scand. 2008 Oct;66(5):257-61. doi: 10.1080/00016350802241563.
Arrais CAG, Giannini M, Rueggeberg FA. Kinetic analysis of monomer conversion in auto- and dual-polymerizing modes of commercial resin luting cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Feb;101(2):128-36. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60008-1.
Blumer L, Schmidli F, Weiger R, Fischer J. A systematic approach to standardize artificialaging of resin composite cements. Dent Mater. 2015 Jul;31(7):855-63. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.04.015.
The Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences uses the Creative Commons license (CC), thus preserving the integrity of the articles in an open access environment.
Downloads
