Banner Portal
Intraoral findings in newborns: prevalence and associated factors


newborn. Oral manifestations. Pediatric dentistry.

How to Cite

Chandler CL, Azevedo ID, Silva Junior MF, Lopes JM, Gordón-Núñez MA, Pereira SA. Intraoral findings in newborns: prevalence and associated factors. Braz. J. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2018 Dec. 4 [cited 2024 May 20];17:e181344. Available from:


Aim: To investigate the prevalence of intraoral characteristics and associated factors with neonatal and parent variables in a group of Brazilian newborns. Methods: This cross-sectional study with a descriptive and inferential approach, whose data was obtained through clinical examination, interview and the collection of medical record information. The sample was selected from babies up to three days old, of both sexes, and born between January and December 2013 in the Ana Bezerra University Hospital, in the city of Santa Cruz-RN, Brazil. The exposure variables included neonatal (sex, weight, gestational age, type of delivery and Apgar score) and parent (presence of systemic disease(s), drug use and consanguinity between the parents) variables. Descriptive analysis and Poisson regression were performed to estimate the ratio of gross and adjusted prevalence of intraoral findings (Epstein pearls, Bohn’s nodule, dental lamina cyst and ankyloglossia) with the neonatal and parent variables (p<0.05). Results: Of a total of 168 examined newborns, 56.5% (n=95) were male. The most prevalent intraoral feature was the fibrous cord of Magitot, 62.5% (n=105), and the most frequent alteration was Epstein pearls, 44.6% (n=75). Female gender was a factor for Bohn’s nodule (OR=0.90; 95%CI:0.82-0.99), and no tobacco use by the father was a protective factor for Epstein pearls (OR=0.73;95%CI:0.55-0.97). Additionally, lower mother’s age, between 20-34 years  of age (OR=1.58;95%CI:1.07-2.35) and under 19 years of age (OR=1.61; 95%CI:1.03-2.52) increases the chance of having Epstein pearls. Conclusion: There was a high prevalence of alterations in the newborns’ oral cavities and there were associations between neonatal and parent variables.


Cetinkaya M, Oz FT, Orhan AI, Orhan K, Karabulut B, Karabulut DCC, et al. Prevalence of oral abnormalities in a Turkish newborn Population. Int Dent J. 2011 Apr;61(2):90-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00020.x.

Flinck A, Paludan A, Matsson L, Holm AK, Axelsson I. Oral findings in a group of newborn Swedish children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1994 Jun;4(2):67-73.

Santos FFC, Pinho, JRO, Libério SA, Curz MCFN. [Prevalence of congenital and developmental oral abnormalities in infants aged 0 to 6 months]. Rev Odonto Cienc 2009;24(1):77-80. Portuguese.

Correa MSN. Odontopediatria na primeira infância. São Paulo: Santos; 2005. p.99-119.

Assed S. Odontopediatria: bases científicas para a prática clínica. São Paulo: Artes Médicas; 2005. p.62-5.

American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs. Guideline on pediatric oral surgery. Pediatr Dent. 2005-2006;27(7 Suppl):158-64.

Abanto J, Raggio DP, Alves FBT, Corrêa FNP, Bonecker M, Corrêa MSNP. Oral characteristics of newborns: report of some oral anomalies and their treatment. Int J Dent 2009 Jul/Set;8(3):140-5.

Fromm A. Epstein’s pearls, Bohn’s nodules, and inclusioncysts of the oral cavity. J Dent Child. 1967 Jul;34(4):275-87.

Kana A1, Markou L, Arhakis A, Kotsanos N. Natal and neonatal teeth: a systematic review of prevalence and management. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Mar;14(1):27-32.

Schmitt MHE, Guzzi SH, Damo MN, Araújo SM, Farias MMAG. Characteristics of the oral cavity of the newborns of Blumenau – SC, Brazil. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr 2012 Jan/Mar;12(1):89-92. doi: 10.4034/PBOCI.2012.121.14.

Liu MH, Huang WH. Oral abnormalities in Taiwanese newborns. J Dent Child (Chic). 2004 May-Aug;71(2):118-20.

George D, Bhat SS, Hegde K. Oral Findings in Newborn Children in and around Mangalore, Karnataka State, India. Med Princ Pract. 2008;17(5):385-9. doi: 10.1159/000141502.

Silva CM, Ramos MM, Carrara CF, Dalben GS. Oral characteristics of newborns. J Dent Child (Chic). 2008 Jan-Apr;75(1):4-6.

Apgar V. A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant. Curr Res Anesth Analg. 1953 Jul-Aug;32(4):260-7.

World Health Organization. Public health aspects of low birth weight: third report of the Expert Committee on Maternal and Child Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1961. (WHO Technical Reporter Service, 217).

Donley CL, Nelson LP. Comparison of palatal and alveolar cysts of the newborn in premature and full-term infants. Pediatr Dent 2000 Jul/Aug;22(4):321-4.

Vaz PMN, Vieira FR, Silveira RG, Miasato JM. More frequent oral alterations in the baby: two cases report of inclusion cysts. Rev Odontol Univ Cid S Paulo. 2010 May/Aug;22(2):174-7.

Flaitz CM. [Oral soft tissue disorders pathologies and disorders]. In: Pinkhan JR. [Pediatric dentistry – from childhood to adolescence]. São Paulo: Artes Médicas; 1996. Portuguese.

Hegde RJ. Sublingual traumatic ulceration due to neonatal teeth (Riga-Fede disease). J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2005 Mar;23(1):51-2.

Mhaske S, Yuwanati MB, Mhaske A, Ragavendra R, Kamath K, Saawarn S. Natal and Neonatal Teeth: An Overview of the Literature. ISRN Pediatr. 2013 Aug 18;2013:956269. doi: 10.1155/2013/956269.

Moyers R. Ortodontia. 3.ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara-Koogan; 1987. 669p.

The Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences uses the Creative Commons license (CC), thus preserving the integrity of the articles in an open access environment.


Download data is not yet available.