Mandibular single-implant overdenture as an alternative for full arch rehabilitations
a literature review
Oral rehabilitation with mandibular single-implant overdentures (SIO) has been characterized as a solution to improve retention and stability of conventional complete dentures (CD). Among the benefits of this therapy, it can be mentioned minimally invasive surgery, simple prosthetic technique, better retention, and significantly reduced costs. However, the application of this protocol in daily clinic is still not widespread. Aim: Thus, this study aimed to perform a literature review to address the clinical characteristics of this rehabilitation, when compared to two-implant mandibular overdentures and CD. Methods: For this, a search was conducted in the PubMed database, considering articles published in English language, without date limitation. Results: It was found 243 manuscripts, of which 20 were compatible with the aim of this study after title/abstract reading. The selected papers focused on masticatory muscles function, satisfaction levels and self-reported quality of life, as well as surgical and prosthetic outcomes, such as maintenance, repair and implant failure rates. All evaluated manuscripts showed similar masticatory function and patient's satisfaction with SIO and two-implant overdenture, while results for a SIO were greater when compared to rehabilitations with CD. In addition, SIO have proven to do not damage the implant, being implant loss close to zero. However, the prosthesis fracture adjacent to the implant was a recurrent clinical outcome, which requires further studies to solve this impairment. Conclusion: Thus, it can be concluded that SIO represents an alternative treatment for frail elders or low-income patients, leading to higher masticatory function, as well as improved quality of life.
Veras R. Population aging today: demands, challenges and innovations. Rev Saude Publica. 2009 Jun;43(3):548-54.
Furuta M, Komiya-Nonaka M, Akifusa S, Shimazaki Y, Adachi M, Kinoshita T, et al. Interrelationship of oral health status, swallowing function, nutritional status, and cognitive ability with activities of daily living in Japanese elderly people receiving home care services due to physical disabilities. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013 Apr;41(2):173-81. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12000.
Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol. 2001;56(3):146-56.
Fitzpatrick B. Standard of care for the edentulous mandible: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Jan;95(1):71-8.
Muller F, Duvernay E, Loup A, Vazquez L, Herrmann FR, Schimmel M. Implant-supported mandibular. Interventions for edentate elders – what is the evidence? J Gerodontol. 2014;31(1):44-51.
Laird WRE, McLaughlin EA. Management of the elderly edentulous patient. Int J Prosthodont. 1989 Jul-Aug;2(4):347-51.
Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two‑implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 Jul-Aug;17(4):601-2.
Klemetti E. Is there a certain number of implants needed to retain an overdenture? J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Jan;35 Suppl 1:80-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01825.x.
Boven GC, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Meijer HJ. Improving masticatory performance, bite force, nutritional state and patient satisfaction with implant overdentures: a systematic review of the literature. J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Mar;42(3):220-33. doi: 10.1111/joor.12241.
Cordioli G, Majzoub Z, Castagna S. Mandibular overdentures anchored to single implants: a five-year prospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 1997Aug;78(2):159-65.
Passia N, Wolfart S, Kern M. Six-year clinical outcome of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures--a pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Oct;26(10):1191-4. doi: 10.1111/clr.12427.
Walton JN, Glick N, Macentee MI. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants. Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Jul-Aug;22(4):331-9.
Bryant SR, Walton JN, MacEntee MI. A 5-year randomized trial to compare 1 or 2 implants for implant overdentures. J Dent Res. 2015 Jan;94(1):36-43. doi: 10.1177/0022034514554224.
Harder S, Wolfart S, Egert C, Kern M. Three-year clinical outcome of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures--results of preliminary prospective study. J Dent. 2011 Oct;39(10):656-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.07.007.
Amaral CF, Pinheiro MA, de Moraes M, Rodrigues Garcia RCM. Psychometric analysis and masticatory efficiency of elderly people with single-implant overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Nov/Dec;33(6):1383-1389. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6557.
Cheng T, Ma L, Liu XL, Sun GF, He XJ, Huo JY, et al. Use of a single implant to retain mandibular overdenture: a preliminary clinical trial of 13 cases. J Dent Sci 2012 Sep;7(3):261-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2012.02.001.
Grover M, Vaidyanathan AK, Veeravalli PT. OHRQoL, masticatory performance and crestal bone loss with single-implant, magnet-retained mandibular overdentures with conventional and shortened dental arch. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 May;25(5):580-6. doi: 10.1111/clr.12111.
Bhat S, Chowdhary R, Mahoorkar S. Comparison of masticatory efficiency, patient satisfaction for single, two, and three implants supported overdenture in the same patient: A pilot study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016 Apr-Jun;16(2):182-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.176522.
Alqutaibi AY, Kaddah AF, Farouk M. Randomized study on the effect of single-implant versus two-implant retained overdentures on implant loss and muscle activity: a 12-month follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jun;46(6):789-797. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.02.001.
Policastro VB, Paleari AG, Leite ARP, Mendoza-Marin DO, Cassiano AFB, Shaddox LM, et al. A randomized clinical trial of oral health-related quality of life, peri-implant and kinesiograph parameters in wearers of one-or two-implant mandibular overdentures. J Prosthodont. 2018 Apr 20. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12796.
Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Kiesswetter E, Drey M, Sieber CC. Nutrition, frailty, and sarcopenia. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Feb;29(1):43-48. doi: 10.1007/s40520-016-0709-0.
Geckili O, Cilingir A, Erdogan O, Kesoglu AC, Bilmenoglu C, Ozdiler A, et al. The influence of momentary retention forces on patient satisfaction and quality of life of two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture wearers. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Mar-Apr;30(2):397-402. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3774.
Krennmair G, Ulm C. The symphyseal single-tooth implant for anchorage of a mandibular complete denture in geriatric patients: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001 Jan-Feb;16(1):98-104.
Liddelow GJ, Henry PJ. A prospective study of immediately loaded single implant-retained mandibular overdentures: preliminary one-year results. J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Jun;97(6 Suppl):S126-37. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60016-X.
Tavakolizadeh S, Vafaee F, Khoshhal M, Ebrahimzadeh Z. Comparison of marginal bone loss and patient satisfaction in single and double-implant assisted mandibular overdenture by immediate loading. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015 Jun;7(3):191-8. doi: 10.4047/jap.2015.7.3.191.
Nogueira TE, Aguiar FMO, de Barcelos BA, Leles CR. A 2-year prospective study of single-implant mandibular overdentures: Patient-reported outcomes and prosthodontic events. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Jun;29(6):541-550. doi: 10.1111/clr.13151.
Nogueira TE, Oliveira Aguiar FM, Esfandiari S, Leles CR. Effectiveness of immediately loaded single-implant mandibular overdentures versus mandibular complete dentures: a 1-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2018 Oct;77:43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.07.006.
Kronstrom M, Davis B, Loney R, Gerrow J, Hollender L. A prospective randomized study on the immediate loading of mandibular overdentures supported by one or two implants; a 3-year follow-up report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014 Jun;16(3):323-9. doi: 10.1111/cid.12006.
Vahidi F, Pinto-Sinai G. Complications associated with implant retained removable prostheses. Dent Clin North Am. 2015 Jan;59(1):215-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2014.08.001.
Gonda T, Maeda Y, Walton JN, MacEntee MI. Fracture incidence in mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants: J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Mar;103(3):178-81. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60026-1.
Passia N, Abou-Ayash S, Reissmann DR, Fritzer E, Kappel S, Konstantinidis I, et al. Single mandibular implant study (SMIS) - masticatory performance - results from a randomized clinical trial using two different loading protocols. J Dent. 2017 Oct;65:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.07.005.
AlSourori AA, Mostafa MH, Kaddah AF, Fayyed AE, Swedan MS, Al-Adl AZ. Impact of single implant versus two-implant mandibular retained over-denture on retention and success rate in totally edentulous patients. A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Osseointegr 2018;10(3):79-86.
Bilhan H, Geckili O, Mumcu E, Cilingir A, Bozdag E. The influence of implant number and attachment type on maximum bite force of mandibular overdentures: a retrospective study. Gerodontology. 2012 Jun;29(2):e116-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.00421.x.
Sivaramakrishnan G, Sridharan K. Comparison of implant-supported mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures on quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Aust Dent J. 2016 Dec;61(4):482-488. doi: 10.1111/adj.12416.
Merz MA, Terheyden H, Huber CG, Seixas AA, Schoetzau A, Schneeberger AR. Facilitators and barries influencing the readiness to receive dental implants in a geriatric institutionalised population - a randomized non-invasive interventional study. Gerodontology. 2017;34(3):306-312.
Müller F, Salem K, Barbezat C, Herrmann FR, Schimmel M. Knowledge and attitude of elderly persons towards dental implants. Gerodontology. 2012;29(2):e914-23.
Liu J, Pan S, Dong J, Mo Z, Fan Y, Feng H. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent. 2013 Mar;41(3):241-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.008.
Amaral CF, Gomes RS, Rodrigues Garcia RCM, Del Bel Cury AA. Stress distribution of single-implant-retained overdenture reinforced with a framework: A finite element analysis study. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 May;119(5):791-796. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.016.
Maeda Y, Horisaka M, Yagi K. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Mar;19(3):271-5.
Nascimento JFM, Aguiar-Júnior FA, Nogueira TE, Rodrigues RCS, Leles CR. Photoelastic stress distribution produced by different retention systems for a single-implant mandibular overdenture. J Prosthodont. 2015 Oct;24(7):538-542. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12269.
Ahmed Elawady DM, Kaddah AF, Talaat Khalifa M. Single vs 2 implants on peri-implant marginal bone level and implant failures in mandibular implant overdentures: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2017 Sep;17(3):216-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2017.02.002.
Rached RN, de Souza EM, Dyer SR, Ferracane JL. Dynamic and static strength of an implant-supported overdenture model reinforced with metal and nonmetal strengtheners. J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Nov;106(5):297-304. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60134-0.
Grageda E, Rieck B. Metal-reinforced single implant mandibular overdenture retained by an attachment: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Jan;111(1):16-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.009.
Amaral CFD, Pinheiro MA, Rodrigues Garcia RCM. Reinforcement of single implant-retained mandibular overdenture with a cobalt-chromium framework before implant surgery. J Prosthodont. 2017 Dec 14. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12732.
Copyright (c) 2019 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences uses the Creative Commons license (CC), thus preserving the integrity of the articles in an open access environment.