Effect of surface treatments on repair strength, roughness and morphology in aged metal-free crowns
Keywords:Ceramics, Composite resins, Electron microscope tomography, Shear strength, Surface properties
Aim: The roughness and micromorphology of various surface treatments in aged metal-free crowns and the bond strength of these crowns repaired with composite resin (CR) was evaluated in vitro. Methods: A CR core build-up was confectioned in 60 premolars and prepared for metal-free crowns. Prepared teeth were molded with the addition of silicone, and the laboratory ceromer/fiber-reinforced crowns (SR Adoro/Fibrex Lab) were fabricated. Subsequently, the crowns were cemented and artificially aged in a mechanical fatigue device (1.2 X 106 cycles), then divided into 4 groups (n = 15) according to the surface treatment: 1) phosphoric acid etching (PA); 2) PA + silane application; 3) roughening with a diamond bur + PA; and 4) sandblasting with Al2O3 + PA. After the treatments, the crowns (n = 2) were qualitatively analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and surface roughness (n = 5) was analyzed before and after the surface treatment (Ra parameter). The remaining crowns (n = 8) received standard repair with an adhesive system (Tetric N-Bond) and a nanohybrid CR (Tetric N-Ceram), and the microshear bond strength (SBS) test was performed (0.5 mm/min). Roughness and SBS data were analyzed by one- and two-way ANOVA, respectively, as well as Tukey’s post-test (α = 0.05). Results: Sandblasting with Al2O3 + PA resulted in the highest final roughness and SBS values. The lowest results were observed in the PA group, whereas the silane and diamond bur groups showed intermediate values. Conclusion: It may be concluded that indirect ceromer crowns sandblasted with aluminum oxide prior to PA etching promote increased roughness surface and bond strength values.
Chun KJ, Lee JY. Comparative study of mechanical properties of dental restorative materials and dental hard tissues in compressive loads. J Dent Biomech. 2014 Oct 11;5:1758736014555246. doi: 10.1177/1758736014555246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1758736014555246
Soares CJ, Pizi EC, Fonseca RB, Martins LR. Influence of root embedment material and periodontal ligament simulation on fracture resistance tests. Braz Oral Res. 2005 Jan-Mar;19(1):11-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242005000100003
Likai W, Yanan L, Yan Z, Pingping L. [Color stability of ceromer of different thicknesses and resin adhesive materials of different types after accelerated aging]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Apr;33(2):201-5. Chinese.
Mak M, Qualtrough AJ, Burke FJ. The effect of different ceramic materials on the fracture resistance of dentin-bonded crowns. Quintessence Int. 1997 Mar;28(3):197-203.
Heintze SD, Rousson V. Fracture rates of IPS Empress all-ceramic crowns--a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Mar-Apr;23(2):129-33.
Aggarwal V, Singla M, Miglani S, Kohli S. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance of structurally compromised canals restored with different dowel methods. J Prosthodont. 2012 Jun;21(4):312-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00827.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00827.x
Hurst D. Indirect or direct restorations for heavily restored posterior adult teeth? Evid Based Dent. 2010;11(4):116-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400760
Koczarski MJ. Utilization of ceromer inlays/onlays for replacement of amalgam restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1998 May;10(4):405-12; quiz 414.
Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Carter B, Nasser M, Alrowaili EF. Single crowns versus conventional fillings for the restoration of root-filled teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 25;(9):CD009109. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009109.pub3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009109.pub3
Fennis WM, Kuijs RH, Roeters FJ, Creugers NH, Kreulen CM. Randomized control trial of composite cuspal restorations: five-year results. J Dent Res. 2014 Jan;93(1):36-41. doi: 10.1177/0022034513510946. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513510946
Loomans BA, Mesko ME, Moraes RR, Ruben J, Bronkhorst EM, Pereira-Cenci T, et al. Effect of different surface treatment techniques on the repair strength of indirect composites. J Dent. 2017 Apr;59:18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.01.010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.01.010
Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, Huysmans MC. Longevity of repaired restorations: a practice based study. J Dent. 2012 Oct;40(10):829-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.06.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.06.007
Demarco FF, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater. 2012 Jan;28(1):87-101. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.003
Arami S, Hasani Tabatabaei M, Namdar F, Safavi N, Chiniforush N. Shear bond strength of the repair composite resin to zirconia ceramic by different surface treatment. J Lasers Med Sci. 2014 Fall;5(4):171-5.
Komine F, Kobayashi K, Saito A, Fushiki R, Koizumi H, Matsumura H. Shear bond strength between an indirect composite veneering material and zirconia ceramics after thermocycling. J Oral Sci. 2009 Dec;51(4):629-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.51.629
Loomans B, Ozcan M. Intraoral Repair of Direct and Indirect Restorations: Procedures and Guidelines. Oper Dent. 2016 Sep;41(S7):S68-S78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/15-269-LIT
Campos F, Almeida CS, Rippe MP, de Melo RM, Valandro LF, Bottino MA. Resin Bonding to a Hybrid Ceramic: Effects of Surface Treatments and Aging. Oper Dent. 2016 Mar-Apr;41(2):171-8. doi: 10.2341/15-057-L. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/15-057-L
Eslamian L, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Mousavi N, Ghasemi A. The effects of various surface treatments on the shear bond strengths of stainless steel brackets to artificially-aged composite restorations. Aust Orthod J. 2011 May;27(1):28-32.
Foxton RM, Nakajima M, Hiraishi N, Kitasako Y, Tagami J, Nomura S, et al. Relationship between ceramic primer and ceramic surface pH on the bonding of dual-cure resin cement to ceramic. Dent Mater. 2003 Dec;19(8):779-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00026-5
Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Jun;81(6):652-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70103-4
Naumann M, Sterzenbach G, Rosentritt M, Beuer F, Frankenberger R. In vitro performance of self-adhesive resin cements for post-and-core build-ups: influence of chewing simulation or 1-year storage in 0.5% chloramine solution. Acta Biomater. 2010 Nov;6(11):4389-95. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.05.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.05.023
Gomes GM, Gomes OM, Gomes JC, Loguercio AD, Calixto AL, Reis A. Evaluation of different restorative techniques for filling flared root canals: fracture resistance and bond strength after mechanical fatigue. J Adhes Dent. 2014 Jun;16(3):267-76. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a31940.
Bittencourt BF, Gomes GM, Trentini FA, Azevedo MRd, Gomes JC, Gomes OMM. Effect of finishing and polishing on surface roughness of composite resins after bleaching. J Braz J Oral Sci. 2014;13(2):158-62. doi: 10.1590/1677-3225v13n2a15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-3225v13n2a15
Amaral FL, Colucci V, Palma-Dibb RG, Corona SA. Assessment of in vitro methods used to promote adhesive interface degradation: a critical review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(6):340-53; discussion 354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00134.x
Barragan G, Chasqueira F, Arantes-Oliveira S, Portugal J. Ceramic repair: influence of chemical and mechanical surface conditioning on adhesion to zirconia. Oral Health Dent Manag. 2014 Jun;13(2):155-8.
Lee SJ, Cheong CW, Wright RF, Chang BM. Bond strength of the porcelain repair system to all-ceramic copings and porcelain. J Prosthodont. 2014 Feb;23(2):112-6. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12064
Cotes C, Cardoso M, Melo RM, Valandro LF, Bottino MA. Effect of composite surface treatment and aging on the bond strength between a core build-up composite and a luting agent. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015 Jan-Feb;23(1):71-8. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720140113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140113
Skupien JA, Cenci MS, Opdam NJ, Kreulen CM, Huysmans MC, Pereira-Cenci T. Crown vs. composite for post-retained restorations: A randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2016 May;48:34-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.03.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.03.007
Ferro MC, Colucci V, Marques AG, Ribeiro RF, Silva-Sousa YT, Gomes EA. Fracture Strength of Weakened Anterior Teeth Associated to Different Reconstructive Techniques. Braz Dent J. 2016 Sep-Oct;27(5):556-61. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201602452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201602452
Costa TR, Ferreira SQ, Klein-Junior CA, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Durability of surface treatments and intermediate agents used for repair of a polished composite. Oper Dent. 2010 Mar-Apr;35(2):231-7. doi: 10.2341/09-216-L. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/09-216-L
Su N, Yue L, Liao Y, Liu W, Zhang H, Li X, et al. The effect of various sandblasting conditions on surface changes of dental zirconia and shear bond strength between zirconia core and indirect composite resin. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015 Jun;7(3):214-23. doi: 10.4047/jap.2015.7.3.214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.3.214
Petridis H, Garefis P, Hirayama H, Kafantaris NM, Koidis PT. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: Part 1. Comparison of shear bond strengths between different metal-resin bonding systems and a metal-ceramic system. Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Nov-Dec;16(6):635-9.
Ozcan M, van der Sleen JM, Kurunmaki H, Vallittu PK. Comparison of repair methods for ceramic-fused-to-metal crowns. J Prosthodont. 2006 Sep-Oct;15(5):283-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00124.x
Al-Shehri EZ, Al-Zain AO, Sabrah AH, Al-Angari SS, Al Dehailan L, Eckert GJ, et al. Effects of air-abrasion pressure on the resin bond strength to zirconia: a combined cyclic loading and thermocycling aging study. Restor Dent Endod. 2017 Aug;42(3):206-15. doi: 10.5395/rde.2017.42.3.206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2017.42.3.206
Grasel R, Santos M, Rêgo HC, Rippe M, Valandro LJOd. Effect of resin luting systems and alumina particle air abrasion on bond strength to zirconia. Oper Dent. 2018 May/Jun;43(3):282-90. doi: 10.2341/15-352-L. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2341/15-352-L
Hallmann L, Ulmer P, Reusser E, Hammerle CH. Surface characterization of dental Y-TZP ceramic after air abrasion treatment. J Dent. 2012 Sep;40(9):723-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.05.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.05.003
Medvedev AE, Ng HP, Lapovok R, Estrin Y, Lowe TC, Anumalasetty VN. Effect of bulk microstructure of commercially pure titanium on surface characteristics and fatigue properties after surface modification by sand blasting and acid-etching. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Apr;57:55-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.11.035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.11.035
Jain S, Parkash H, Gupta S, Bhargava A. To evaluate the effect of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength of three different intraoral ceramic repair systems: an in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013 Sep;13(3):315-20. doi: 10.1007/s13191-013-0270-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0270-x
da Costa TR, Serrano AM, Atman AP, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Durability of composite repair using different surface treatments. J Dent. 2012 Jun;40(6):513-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.001
Lucena-Martin C, Gonzalez-Lopez S, Navajas-Rodriguez de Mondelo JM. The effect of various surface treatments and bonding agents on the repaired strength of heat-treated composites. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Nov;86(5):481-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.116775
Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR. Phillips' science of dental materials. 12.ed. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012.
How to Cite
The Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences uses the Creative Commons license (CC), thus preserving the integrity of the articles in an open access environment.