Banner Portal
In vitro fracture strength and modes of cast post and cores luted with self-adhesive resin-based cement
PDF

Keywords

Post and core technique
Resin cements
Adhesiveness
Fractures, compression.

How to Cite

1.
Pomini MC, Machado MM, Quadros G de P, Pinheiro LOB, Samra APB. In vitro fracture strength and modes of cast post and cores luted with self-adhesive resin-based cement. Braz. J. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2019 Dec. 19 [cited 2024 Jul. 1];18:e191635. Available from: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657261

Abstract

Aim: Cast post and core (CPC) is the main used post type; however, the biomechanical behavior of CPCs adhesively luted to the dentin is still unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the fracture resistance (FR) and fracture modes of teeth restored with CPCs luted with zinc-phosphate (ZP) or resin-based self-adhesive (SA) cements, as well as the influence of the coronal remnant. Methods: For that, 24 human premolars were divided into four groups according to the cement (ZP or SA) and coronal remnant (with or without 2mm). FR was tested in a universal machine and data analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD (α=.05). Fracture modes were classified according to the degree of dental destruction. Results: The results showed that there was no difference in FR (p=.352); however, teeth without ferrule presented more irreparable fractures, specially in the ZP group. Conclusion: All in all, self-adhesion of CPCs does not enhance fracture resistance, however it reduces the number of irreparable fractures, compared to ZP cement.

https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v18i0.8657261
PDF

References

Shamseddine L, Chabaan F. Impact of a Core Ferrule Design on Fracture Resistance of Teeth Restored with Cast Post and Core. Adv Med. 2016;2016: 5073459. doi:10.1155/2016/5073459.

Soares CJ, Valdivia ADCM, Silva GR, Santana FR, Menezes MS. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of post systems: a literature review. Braz Dent J. 2012;23(2):135-40. doi:10.1590/S0103-64402012000200008.

Parčina AI, Baraba A. Esthetic Intracanal Posts. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2016 Jun;50:143-50.

Capa N, Ozkurt Z, Canpolat C, Kazazoglu E. Shear bond strength of luting agents to fixed prosthodontic restorative core materials. Aust Dent J. 2009 Dec;54(4):334-40.

Sarkis-Onofre R, Jacinto RC, Boscato N, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T. Cast metal vs. glass fibre posts: A randomized controlled trial with up to 3 years of follow up. J Dent. 2014 May;42(5):582-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.003.

Balkenhol M, Wöstmann B, Rein C, Ferger P. Survival time of cast post and cores: a 10-year retrospective study. J Dent. 2007 Jan;35(1):50-8.

Behr M, Rosentritt M, Wimmer J, Lang R, Kolbeck C, Bürgers R, Handel G. Self-adhesive resin cement versus zinc phosphate luting material: a prospective clinical trial begun 2003. Dent Mater. 2009;25(5):601-4. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2008.11.003.

Balkaya MC, Birdal IS. Effect of resin-based materials on fracture resistance of endodontically treated thin-walled teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2013 May;109(5):296-303. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60304-2.

Pomini MC, Machado MM, de Paula Quadros G, Gomes GM, Pinheiro LOB, Samra APB. In Vitro Fracture Resistance and Bond Strength of Self-Adhesively Luted Cast Metal and Fiber-Reinforced Composite Posts and Cores: Influence of Ferrule and Storage Time. Int J Prosthodont. 2019;32(2):205-7. doi:10.11607/ijp.5956.

The Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences uses the Creative Commons license (CC), thus preserving the integrity of the articles in an open access environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.