Keywords
Surface properties
Ceramics.
How to Cite
Abstract
Aim: The objective was to evaluate, quantitative and qualitative, the abrasive effect of three polishing systems on the monolithic zirconia ceramic. Methods: Thirty disk-shaped samples of Yttria Tetragonal Zirconia Polycrystal (Y-TZP) were randomly distributed in three groups (n = 10) according to polishing system: G1- Komet system (KO); G2 - CeraGloss system (CG); G3 - Eve Diacera system (EV). The surface roughness (Ra) was obtained with Rugosimeter in four different moments: a) initial - glaze sample (Ra0); b) after occlusal adjustment with diamond burs (Ra1); c) after polishing with the abrasive systems (Ra2); d) after polishing with felt disc and diamond paste (Ra3). Four additional samples were observed in scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: According to the Generalized Estimating Equation followed by the Bonferroni test (α = 0.05), the CG provided the lowest Ra2 (0.63 μm), not differing significantly from the KO (0.78 μm). The highest Ra2 was obtained with the EV (0.97 μm), which did not differ significantly from the KO. There was no statistical difference in Ra between the polishing with the abrasive systems (Ra2) and the final polishing with diamond paste (Ra3). SEM images showed that the polishing systems did not completely remove the grooves caused by the diamond burs during the occlusal adjustment. Conclusion: It was concluded that CG promoted smoother surface of the monolithic zirconia ceramic compared to EV, and intermediate smoothness was obtained with KO.
References
Senyilmaz DP, Canay S, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Influence of thermomechanical fatigue loading on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic posterior crowns. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2010;18(2):50-4.
Li RW, Chow TW, Matinlinna JP. Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: state of the art. J Prosthodont Res. 2014 Oct;58(4):208-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2014.07.003.
Kim HK, Kim SH, Lee JB, Ha SR. Effects of surface treatments on the translucency, opalescence, and surface texture of dental monolithic zirconia ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Jun;115(6):773-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.020.
Gui J, Xie Z. Phase transformation and slow crack growth study of Y- TZP dental ceramic. Mater Sci Eng A. 2016 Sep;676:531-5. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.09.026.
Al-Haj Husain N, Camilleri J, Özcan M. Effect of polishing instruments and polishing regimens on surface topography and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia: an evaluation with XPS and XRD analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Dec;64:104-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.07.025.
Johansson C, Kmet G, Rivera J, Larsson C, Vult Von Steyern P. Fracture strength of monolithic all-ceramic crowns made of high translucent yttrium oxide-stabilized zirconium dioxide compared to porcelain-veneered crowns and lithium disilicate crowns. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014 Feb;72(2):145-53. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2013.822098.
Aboushelib MN, Feilzer AJ, Kleverlaan CJ. Bridging the gap between clinical failure and laboratory fracture strength tests using a fractographic approach. Dent Mater. 2009 Mar;25(3):383-91. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.09.001.
Egilmez F, Ergun G, Cekic-Nagas I, Vallittu PK, Lassila LVJ. Factors affecting the mechanical behavior of Y- TZP. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Sep;37:78-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.05.013.
Song JY, Park SW, Lee K, Yun KD, Lim HP. Fracture strength and microstructure of Y- TZP zirconia after different surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Oct;110(4):274-80. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60376-5.
Hmaidouch R, Müller WD, Lauer HC, Weigl P. Surface roughness of zirconia for full-contour crowns after clinically simulated grinding and polishing. Int J Oral Sci. 2014 Dec;6(4):241-6. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2014.34.
Rashid H. The effect of surface roughness on ceramics used in dentistry: a review of literature. Eur J Dent. 2014 Oct;8(4):571-9. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.143646.
Koudi MS. Dental Materials: Prep manual for undergraduates. New Delhi: Harcourti-India-Private; 2007.
Goo CL, Yap A, Tan K, Fawzy AS. Effect of polishing systems on surface roughness and topography of monolithic zirconia. Oper Dent. 2016 Jul-Aug;41(4):417-23. doi: 10.2341/15-064-L.
Park C, Vang MS, Park SW, Lim HP. Effect of various polishing systems on the surface roughness and phase transformation of zirconia and the durability of the polishing systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Mar;117(3):430-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.10.005.
Steiner R, Beier US, Heiss-Kisielewsky I, Engelmeier R, Dumfahrt H, Dhima M. Adjusting dental ceramics: an in vitro evaluation of the ability of various ceramic polishing kits to mimic glazed dental ceramic surface. J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Jun;113(6):616-22. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.007.
Delong R, Douglas WH, Sakaguchi RL, Pintado MR. The wear of dental porcelain in an artificial mouth. Dent Mater. 1986 Oct;2(5):214-9.
Jagger DC, Harrison A. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of unglazed, glazed, and polished porcelain on human enamel. J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Sep;72(3):320-3.
Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all- ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Dec;92(6):557-62.
Janyavula S, Lawson N, Cakir D, Beck P, Ramp LC, Burgess JO. The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Aug 1. pii: S0022-3913(16)30197-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.026.
Pereira GKR, Fraga S, Montagner AF, Soares FZM, Kleverlaan CJ, Valandro LF. The effect of grinding on the mechanical behavior of Y-TZP ceramics: a systematic review and meta-analyses. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Oct;63:417-442. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.06.028.
Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997 Jul;13(4):258-69.
Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17 Suppl 2:68-81.
Happe A, Röling N, Schäfer A, Rothamel D. Effects of different polishing protocols on the surface roughness of Y-TZP surfaces used for custom-made implant abutments: a controlled morphologic SEM and profilometric pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2015 May;113(5):440-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.005.
Mohammadi-Bassir M, Babasafari M, Rezvani MB, Jamshidian M. Effect of coarse grinding, overglazing, and 2 polishing systems on the flexural strength, surface roughness, and phase transformation of yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Nov;118(5):658-665. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.019.
Jones CS, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations. Br Dent J. 2004 Jan 10;196(1):42-5.
Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Kim MJ, Hsu SM, Abdulhameed N, Jenkins R, Neal D, et al. Randomized clinical study of wear of ebamel antagonists against polished monolithic zirconia crowns. J Dent. 2018 Jan;68:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.10.005.
The Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences uses the Creative Commons license (CC), thus preserving the integrity of the articles in an open access environment.
Downloads
