Banner Portal
In vitro study of marginal, internal and proximal adaptation of implant-supported single-crown CAD/CAM restorations


Computer-aided design
Data accuracy

How to Cite

Alves KAF, Damasceno JE, Oliveira VMB de, Bastos LGC, Nóbrega Cavalcanti A. In vitro study of marginal, internal and proximal adaptation of implant-supported single-crown CAD/CAM restorations. Braz. J. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2020 Aug. 27 [cited 2024 Apr. 15];19:e207286. Available from:


Aim: This study evaluated the precision of a CAD/CAM system by measuring marginal, internal and proximal fits in implantsupported single-crown restorations. Methods: Ten models of the upper arch were made in which implants replaced the upper left premolars. For fabrication of the zirconia infrastructures, titanium bases (TiBase) were coded and scanned using a scan body. A second digital impression was made for the fabrication of prostheses. Silicone impression material was used to determine the internal clearance between the TiBase and infrastructure and between the infrastructure and crown, whose thickness was measured at three points [P1 (cervical), P2 (middle) and P3 (occlusal)] with a stereoscopic microscope at 70x and 100x magnification. One-way ANOVA for repeated measures and the Student t-test were used for the analysis of internal and marginal adaptation. Proximal contacts were analyzed qualitatively. Results: There was no significant difference between the teeth evaluated (Student’s t-test; p>0.05) or between the corresponding points evaluated in either tooth (one-way ANOVA; p>0.05). Analysis of the internal clearance between the infrastructure and crown demonstrated that all points were significantly different compared to the reference standardized at 100 μm (Student’s t-test p<0.0001). There was no significant difference between P1 and P2, with the thickness at these two points being lower than that obtained at P3 (one-way ANOVA, p<0.05). The proximal contacts did not coincide with the quality defined by the device. Conclusion: The system tested was unable to produce implantsupported single-crown ceramic restorations with marginal, internal and proximal fits matching the digital workflow, with the inferior fits requiring adjustment prior to cementation.


Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: A new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Feb;109(2):121-8. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1.

Al-Abdullah K, Zandparsa R, Finkelman M, Hirayama H. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations. J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Aug;110(2):90-100. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60346-7.

Vogtlin C, Schulz G, Deyhle H, Jager K, Liebrich T, Weikert S, et al. Comparison of denture models by means of micro computed tomography. Proc Spie. Developments in X-Ray Tomography VIII, 85061S. 2012 Oct 17. doi: 0.1117/12.930068.

Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent. 2010 Jul;38(7):553-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.015.

Papadiochou S and Pissiotis AL. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 018 Apr;119(4):545-51. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.001.

Kale E, Yilmaz B, Seker E and Özcelik TB. Effect of fabrication stages and cementation on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Dec;118(6):736-41. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.01.004.

Menini M, Setti P, Pera F, Pesce P. Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression: traditional techniques versus a digital procedure. Clin Oral Invest. 2018 Apr;22(3):1253-62. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2217-9.

Alghazzawi TF. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res. 2016 Apr;60(2):72-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.01.003.

Nejatidanesh F, Shakibamehr AH and Savabi O. Comparison of marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM and conventional cement retained implant-supported single crowns. Implant Dent. 2016 Feb;25(1):103-8. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000346.

Fasbinder DJ, Dennison JB, Heys D, Neiva G. A clinical evaluation of chairside lithium disillicate CAD/CAM crows: a two-year report. J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Jun;141 Suppl 2:10S-4S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0355.

Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, Ren Y. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantolog. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043312.

Cook KT, Fasbinder DJ. Accuracy of CAD/CAM Crown Fit with Infrared and LED Cameras. Int J Comput Dent. 2012;15(4):315-26.

Dentsply Sirona. The Dental Company. Digital Dentistry [access 2015 Jun 5]. Available from:

Alves KAF, Damasceno JE, Oliveira VMB, Bastos LGC, Cavalcanti AN. Technologies for impression and manufacturing prosthesis on implants: literature review. J Clin Dent Res. 2019 Jan-Apr;16(1):84-92. doi: 10.14436/2447-911x.16.1.084-092.oar.

Cardelli P, Scotti R, Monaco C. Clinical fitting of CAD/CAM zirconia single crowns generated from digital intraoral impressions based on active wavefront sampling. J Dent. 2011 Oct 17. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.10.005.

Mahl D, Glenz F, Marinello CP. [Digital implant impression taking - an overview]. Swiss Dent J. 2014; 124(2):165-86. German.

Rosentritt M, Rembs A, Behr M, Hahnel S, Preis V. In vitro performance of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns: Influence of patient- specific tooth-coloured abutments with titanium adhesive bases. J Dent. 2015 Jul;43(7):839-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.011.

Yucel MT, Aykent F, Avunduk MC. In vitro evaluation of the marginal fit of different all-ceramic crowns. J Dent Sci. 2013;8(3):225-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2012.05.009.

Hickel R, Dasch W, Mehl A, Kremers L. CAD/CAM: fillings of the future? Int Dent J. 997 Oct;47(5):247-58. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-595x.1997.tb00785.x.

Holmes JR, Sulik WD, Holland GA, Bayne SC. Marginal fit of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1992 May;67(5):594-9. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90153-2.

Molin MK, Karlsson SL, Kristiansen MS. Influence of film thickness on joint bend strength of a ceramic/resin composite joint. Dent Mater. 1996 Jul;12(4):245-9. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(96)80030-3

Mclean JW, Von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 971 Aug;131(3):107-11. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708.

Ardekani KT, Ahangari AH, Farahi L. Marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM and slip-cast made zirconia copings. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2012 Spring;6(2):42-8. doi: 10.5681/joddd.2012.010.

D’Arcy BL, Omer OE, Byrne DA, Quinn F. The reproducibility and accuracy of internal fit of cerec 3d CAD/CAM all ceramic crowns. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2009 Jun;17(2):73-7.

Aktas G, Ozcan N, Aydin DH, Sahin E, Akça K. Effect of digitizing techniques on the fit of implant-retained crowns with different antirotational abutment features. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 May;111(5):367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.11.001.

Colpani JT, Borba M, Bona AD. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic crown copings. Dent Mater 2013; 29:174-80.

Torii M, Tsuchitani Y. Marginal adaptability and fit of ceramic milled inlays. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995 Oct;126(10):1414-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0053.

Leinfelder KF, Isenberg BP, Essig ME. A new method for generating ceramic restorations: a CAD-CAM system. J Am Dent Assoc. 1989 Jun;118(6):703-7. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1989.0156.

Brawek PK, Wolfart S, Endres L, Kirsten A, Reich S. The Clinical accuracy of sigle crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow-the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Invest. 2013 Dec;17(9):2119-25. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-0923-5.

Rahme HY, Tehini GE, Adib SM, Ardo AS, Rifai KT. In vitro evaluation of the "replica technique" in the measurement of the fit of Procera crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Feb;9(2):25-32.

Dedmon HW. Disparity in expert opinions on size of acceptable margins openings. Oper Dent. 1982 Summer;7(3):97-101.

Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent. 1990 Jul;64(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90147-5.

Trifkovic B, Budak L, Todorovic A, Hodolic J, Puskar T, Jevremovic D, et al. Application of replica technique and SEM in accuracy measurement of ceramic crowns. Measur Sci Rev. 2012;12(3):90-7. doi: 10.2478/v10048-012-0016-7.

Pfeiffer J. Dental CAD/CAM technologies: The optical impression (II). Int J Comput Dent. 1999 Jan;2(1):65-72.

Moldovan O, Luthardt RG, Corcodel N, Rudolph H. Three - dimensional fit of CAD/CAM made zirconia copings. Dent Mater. 2011 Dec;27(12):1273-8. doi: 10.1016/

Liu B, Lu C, Wu Y, Zhang X, Arola D, Zhang D. The effects of adhesive type and thickness on stress distribution in molars restored with all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthodont. 2011 Jan;20(1):35-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00650.x.

Guichet DL, Yoshinobu D, Caputo AA. Effect of splinting and interproximal contact tightness on load transfer by implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 May;87(5):528-35. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.124589.

The Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences uses the Creative Commons license (CC), thus preserving the integrity of the articles in an open access environment.


Download data is not yet available.