Banner Portal
Dentin bond strength evaluation between a conventional and universal adhesive using etch-and-rinse strategy
PDF

Keywords

Dentin-bonding agents
Dentin
Methacrylates
Microscopy, confocal

How to Cite

1.
Moreira de Freitas Guimarães G, Modena KC da S, Sugio CYC, de Luccas Bueno T, Silvério Agulhari MA, Atta MT. Dentin bond strength evaluation between a conventional and universal adhesive using etch-and-rinse strategy . Braz. J. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2021 Feb. 8 [cited 2024 Apr. 19];20(00):e219342. Available from: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8659342

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) and the characteristics of the adhesive interface of Scotchbond Universal - SU – etch-and-rise mode (3M ESPE) and Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose - MP (3M ESPE) to dentin over time. Methods: Class I cavity preparations were performed in 60 human molars that were randomly divided according to the dentin bonding system (DBS) used (n=30): (1) Acid conditioning + SU and (2) Acid conditioning + MP. For bonding strength (BS) analysis, 30 teeth (n = 15) were sectioned into sticks and submitted to the microtensile test in a universal testing machine after 24 hours and 12 months. The adhesive interface of the others 30 teeth was analyzed in a confocal microscope after 24 hours and 12 months. The data of μTBS were analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD (α = 0.05). Results: SU presented the lowest DBS compared to MP (p=0.000). Time did not influenced DBS for both adhesive systems (p=0.177). Confocal microscopy analysis showed no cracks between both adhesive systems tested. Conclusion: The results indicate that MP - μTBS showed a better performance compared to SU in total-etch mode.

https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8659342
PDF

References

Carrilho E, Cardoso M, Marques Ferreira M, Marto CM, Paula A, Coelho AS. 10-MDP based dental adhesives: adhesive interface characterization and adhesive stability-a systematic review. Materials (Basel). 2019 Mar 7;12(5):790. doi: 10.3390/ma12050790.

Hashimoto M, Hirose N, Kitagawa H, Yamaguchi S, Imazato S. Improving the durability of resin-dentin bonds with an antibacterial monomer MDPB. Dent Mater J. 2018 Jul;37(4):620-27. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2017-209.

Pucci CR, Gu LS, Zhang HY, Song Q, Xia VW, Davis LB, et al. Water-associated attributes in the contemporary dentin bonding milieu. J Dent. 2018 Jul;74:79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.016.

Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent. 2014 Jul;42(7):800-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.012.

Freitas PH, Giannini M, Franca R, Correr AB, Correr-Sobrinho L, Consani S. Correlation between bond strength and nanomechanical properties of adhesive interface. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 May;21(4):1055-62. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1847-7.

Inoue S, Koshiro K, Yoshida Y, De Munck J, Nagakane K, Suzuki K, et al. Hydrolytic stability of self-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res. 2005 Dec;84(12):1160-4. doi: 10.1177/154405910508401213.

Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Nato F, Carrilho M, Visintini E, Tjaderhane L, et al. Chlorhexidine stabilizes the adhesive interface: a 2-year in vitro study. Dent Mater. 2010 Apr;26(4):320-5. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.153.

Porto ICCM, Nascimento TG, Oliveira JMS, Freitas PH, Haimeur A, Franca R. Use of polyphenols as a strategy to prevent bond degradation in the dentin-resin interface. Eur J Oral Sci. 2018 Apr;126(2):146-58. doi: 10.1111/eos.12403.

Ferracane JL. Resin-based composite performance: Are there some things we can't predict? Dent Mater. 2013 Jan;29(1):51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.06.013.

Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R, Gaebler P. Micromorphological evaluation of posterior composite restorations - a 10-year report. J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Oct;31(10):991-1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01329.x.

Tekce N, Tuncer S, Demirci M, Balci S. Do matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors improve the bond durability of universal dental adhesives? Scanning. 2016 Dec;38(6):535-44. doi: 10.1002/sca.21293.

Tjaderhane L, Nascimento FD, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Tersariol IL, Geraldeli S, et al. Optimizing dentin bond durability: control of collagen degradation by matrix metalloproteinases and cysteine cathepsins. Dent Mater. 2013 Jan;29(1):116-35. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.004.

Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, Zhang ZY, Zhou LQ, Jiao K, et al. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine--Old wine in new bottles? J Dent. 2015 May;43(5):525-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.004.

Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003 May-Jun;28(3):215-35. doi:

Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011 Jan;27(1):17-28. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023.

Abdalla AI, Feilzer AJ. Four-year water degradation of a total-etch and two self-etching adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent. 2008 2008/08/01/;36(8):611-7.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.04.011.

Cruz J, Sousa B, Coito C, Lopes M, Vargas M, Cavalheiro A. Microtensile bond strength to dentin and enamel of self-etch vs. etch-and-rinse modes of universal adhesives. Am J Dent. 2019 Aug;32(4):174-82.

Munoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Malaquias P, Hass V, Reis A, Campanha NH, et al. In vitro longevity of bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Oper Dent. 2015 May-Jun;40(3):282-92. doi: 10.2341/14-055-L.

Wu Z, Zheng H, Ouyang Y, Li M, Zhang L, Su J, et al. Prime-and-rinse approach for improving the enamel micro-tensile bond strengths of self-etch adhesives. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2019 2019/04/18;33(8):871-85. doi: 10.1080/01694243.2018.1564524.

Follak AC, Miotti LL, Lenzi TL, Rocha RO, Soares FZM. Degradation of multimode adhesive system bond strength to artificial caries-affected dentin due to water storage. Oper Dent. 2018 Mar-Apr;43(2):E92-E101. doi: 10.2341/17-129-L.

Perdigao J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent. 2012 Jun;25(3):153-8.

Theobaldo JD, Catelan A, Rodrigues U, Marchi GM, Lima DANL, Aguiar FHB. Effect of Cigarette smoke on resin composite bond strength to enamel and dentin using different adhesive systems. Oper Dent. 2016 May-Jun;41(3):E57-E63. doi: 10.2341/15-056-L.

Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res. 2004 Jun;83(6):454-8. doi: 10.1177/154405910408300604.

Wang R, Shi Y, Li T, Pan Y, Cui Y, Xia W. Adhesive interfacial characteristics and the related bonding performance of four self-etching adhesives with different functional monomers applied to dentin. J Dent. 2017 Jul;62:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.010.

De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: Methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005 Feb;84(2):118-32. doi: Doi 10.1177/154405910508400204.

Liu Y, Tjaderhane L, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Li N, Mao J, et al. Limitations in bonding to dentin and experimental strategies to prevent bond degradation. J Dent Res. 2011 Aug;90(8):953-68. doi: 10.1177/0022034510391799.

Pashley DH, Tay FR, Carvalho RM, Rueggeberg FA, Agee KA, Carrilho M, et al. From dry bonding to water-wet bonding to ethanol-wet bonding. A review of the interactions between dentin matrix and solvated resins using a macromodel of the hybrid layer. Am J Dent. 2007 Feb;20(1):7-20.

Almeida Junior L, Lula ECO, Penha KJS, Correia VS, Magalhaes FAC, Lima DM, et al. Polymerization Shrinkage of Bulk Fill Composites and its Correlation with Bond Strength. Braz Dent J. 2018 May-Jun;29(3):261-7. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201801838.

Belli S, Donmez N, Eskitascioglu G. The effect of C-factor and flowable resin or fiber use at the interface on microtensile bond strength to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2006 Aug;8(4):247-53.

El-Sahn NA, El-Kassas DW, El-Damanhoury HM, Fahmy OM, Gomaa H, Platt JA. Effect of C-factor on microtensile bond strengths of low-shrinkage composites. Oper Dent. 2011 May-Jun;36(3):281-92. doi: 10.2341/10-105-L.

Han SH, Park SH. Incremental and Bulk-fill Techniques With Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Different Cavity Configurations. Oper Dent. 2018 Nov/Dec;43(6):631-41. doi: 10.2341/17-279-LR.

McLeod ME, Price RB, Felix CM. Effect of configuration factor on shear bond strengths of self-etch adhesive systems to ground enamel and dentin. Oper Dent. 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):84-93. doi: 10.2341/09-075-L.

Nikolaenko SA, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf M, Petschelt A, Dasch W, Frankenberger R. Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Dent Mater. 2004 Jul;20(6):579-85. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2003.08.001.

Singh TV, Patil JP, Raju RVSC, Venigalla BS, Jyotsna SV, Neha B. Comparison of effect of C-Factor on bond strength to human dentin using different composite resin materials. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Aug;9(8):Zc88-Zc91. doi: 10.7860/Jcdr/2015/14026.6384.

Bim Junior O, Cebim MA, Atta MT, Machado CM, Francisconi-Dos-Rios LF, Wang L. Determining optimal fluorescent agent concentrations in dental adhesive resins for imaging the tooth/restoration interface. Microsc Microanal. 2017 Feb;23(1):122-30. doi: 10.1017/S143192761601271X.

Yazici AR, Celik C, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B. Bond strength of different adhesive systems to dental hard tissues. Oper Dent. 2007 Mar-Apr;32(2):166-72. doi: 10.2341/06-49.

Tay FR, Pashley DH. Resin bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: a review. J Dent. 2004 Mar;32(3):173-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2003.10.009.

Reis A, Loguercio AD, Schroeder M, Luque-Martinez I, Masterson D, Maia LC. Does the adhesive strategy influence the post-operative sensitivity in adult patients with posterior resin composite restorations? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2015 Sep;31(9):1052-67. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.06.001.

Gamborgi GP, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Influence of enamel border and regional variability on durability of resin-dentin bonds. J Dent. 2007 May;35(5):371-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.11.005.

Memarpour M, Shafiei F, Razmjouei F, Soltani M. Shear bond strength and scanning electron microscopy characteristics of universal adhesive in primary tooth dentin: An in vitro study. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2018 Jul-Aug;15(4):264-70. doi:

Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Hayakawa S, Nagaoka N, Irie M, Ogawa T, et al. Nanolayering of phosphoric acid ester monomer on enamel and dentin. Acta Biomater. 2011 Aug;7(8):3187-95. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.04.026.

Hidari T, Takamizawa T, Imai A, Hirokane E, Ishii R, Tsujimoto A, et al. Role of the functional monomer 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate in dentin bond durability of universal adhesives in etch-&-rinse mode. Dent Mater J. 2020 Aug;39(4):616-23. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-154.

Zhang L, Wang W, Wang C, Li M, Wang Z, Su Z, et al. Interaction of ACP and MDP and its effect on dentin bonding performance. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019 Mar;91:301-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.12.017.

Pouyanfar H, Tabaii ES, Aghazadeh S, Nobari SPTN, Imani MM. Microtensile bond strength of composite to enamel using universal adhesive with/without acid etching compared to etch and rinse and self-etch bonding agents. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 6(11):2186-92. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.427.

Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, Apolonio F, Diolosà M, Cadenaro M, et al. Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-Year in vitro study. J Dent. 2014 2014/05/01/;42(5):603-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.008.

da Rosa WLD, Piva E, da Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015 Jul;43(7):765-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003.

Anchieta R, Oliveira F, Sundfeld R, Rahal V, Machado L, de Alexandre R, et al. Analysis of hybrid layer thickness, resin tag length and their correlation with microtensile bond strength using a total etch adhesive to intact dentin. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2011 12/01;24:272-8.

Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent. 2002 Sep-Nov;30(7-8):371-82. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(02)00064-7.

Peumans M, De Munck J, Mine A, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. A systematic review. Dent Mater. 2014 Oct;30(10):1089-103. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.007.

Vermelho PM, Reis AF, Ambrosano GMB, Giannini M. Adhesion of multimode adhesives to enamel and dentin after one year of water storage. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jun;21(5):1707-15. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1966-1.

Mitsui FH, Peris AR, Cavalcanti AN, Marchi GM, Pimenta LA. Influence of thermal and mechanical load cycling on microtensile bond strengths of total and self-etching adhesive systems. Oper Dent. 2006 Mar-Apr;31(2):240-7. doi: 10.2341/05-20.

Dos Santos PA, Garcia PP, Palma-Dibb RG. Shear bond strength of adhesive systems to enamel and dentin. Thermocycling influence. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2005 Aug;16(8):727-32. doi: 10.1007/s10856-005-2609-2.

De Munck J, Van den Steen PE, Mine A, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Opdenakker G, et al. Inhibition of enzymatic degradation of adhesive-dentin interfaces. J Dent Res. 2009 Dec;88(12):1101-6. doi: 10.1177/0022034509346952.

Pashley DH, Tay FR, Yiu C, Hashimoto M, Breschi L, Carvalho RM, et al. Collagen degradation by host-derived enzymes during aging. J Dent Res. 2004 Mar;83(3):216-21. doi: 10.1177/154405910408300306.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.