Keywords
Dentin
Dental bonding
How to Cite
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the bond durability of two universal adhesives; mild and ultra-mild in both etch-and-rinse and self-etch modes after simulated in-vitro degradation by long-term water storage or thermocycling. Methods. A total of 144 specimens were used in this study; 120 specimens (prepared from 30 teeth) for microshear bond strength testing and fracture mode assessment, and 24 specimens for scanning electron microscopic evaluation (prepared from 24 teeth). Specimens were prepared from 54 recently extracted caries free third molars and randomly divided into 12 groups, according to the adhesive treatment (All Bond or Scotchbond Universal), etching mode (etch-andrinse or self-etch) and aging method (thermocycling or water storage). Each tooth was sectioned mesio-distally into two halves exposing free dentin surface for bonding where dentin substrate 1 mm below the dentino-enamel junction was used. After adhesive application and composite build up, specimens were tested in shear mode after storing in distilled water at 37˚C for 24 hours or 1 year, or after being thermocycled between 5 and 55 °C for 10,000 cycles (n=10). Microshear bond strength (μSBS) was tested using a universal testing machine. Adhesive-dentin interface was examined using scanning electron microscope (SEM) (n=2). Data were analyzed using 3 way AN0VA and pairwise comparisons was performed using Bonferroni correction at significance level of α ≤0.05. Results. Statistical analysis revealed non-significant difference for etching mode in both adhesives (p=0.596). After aging, the bond strength was only reduced in Scotchbond Universal after one year of water storage in both modes (p<0.001). SEM evaluation revealed intact hybrid layer and longer resin tags for etch-and-rinse mode than selfetch mode of both adhesives. Conclusion. The bond strength of universal adhesives is not affected by the etching mode, however its durability was shown to be material dependent.
References
Vaidyanathan TK, Vaidyanathan J. Recent advances in the theory and mechanism of adhesive resin bonding to dentin: a critical review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 Feb;88(2):558-78. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31253.
Nagarkar S, Theis‐Mahon N, Perdigão J. Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019 Aug;107(6):2121-31. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34305.
Muñoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NHC. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent. 2013 May;41(5):404-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.001.
Cuevas-Suarez CE, da Rosa WLO, Lund RG, da Silva AF, Piva E. Bonding performance of universal adhesives: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(1):7-26. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a41975.
Chen C, Niu L-N, Xie H, Zhang Z-Y, Zhou L-Q, Jiao K, et al. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine–Old wine in new bottles? J Dent. 2015 May;43(5):525-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.004.
Alex G. Universal adhesives: the next evolution in adhesive dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015 Jan;36(1):15-26; quiz 28, 40.
Liu Y, Tjäderhane L, Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Li N, Mao J, et al. Limitations in bonding to dentin and experimental strategies to prevent bond degradation. J. Dent. Res. 2011 Aug;90(8):953-68. doi: 10.1177/0022034510391799.
Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol. 2017 Jul 3;8(1):1-17. doi: 10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001.
Sai K, Shimamura Y, Takamizawa T, Tsujimoto A, Imai A, Endo H, et al. Influence of degradation conditions on dentin bonding durability of three universal adhesives. J Dent. 2016 Nov;54:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.09.004.
Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater J. 2010 Feb;26(2):e100-21. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.148.
Zhang Z-y, Tian F-c, Niu L-n, Ochala K, Chen C, Fu B-p, et al. Defying ageing: An expectation for dentine bonding with universal adhesives? J Dent. 2016 Feb;45:43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.11.008.
Kaczor K, Gerula-Szymanska A, Smektala T, Safranow K, Lewusz K, Nowicka A. Effects of different etching modes on the nanoleakage of universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 Jul;30(4):287-98. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12375.
Sezinando A, Perdigao J, Ceballos L. Long-term In vitro adhesion of polyalkenoate-based adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(4):305-16. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a38895.
Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, Apolonio F, Diolosa M, Cadenaro M, et al. Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. J Dent. 2014 May;42(5):603-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.008.
Lezaja Zebic M, Dzeletovic B, Miletic V. Microtensile bond strength of universal adhesives to flat versus Class I cavity dentin with pulpal pressure simulation. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 May;30(3):240-8. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12363.
Manfroi FB, Marcondes ML, Somacal DC, Borges GA, Junior LH, Spohr AM. Bond strength of a novel one bottle multi-mode adhesive to human dentin after six months of storage. Open Dent. 2016 Jun;10:268-77. doi: 10.2174/1874210601610010268.
Perdigao J, Swift Jr E, Denehy G, Wefel J, Donly K. In vitro bond strengths and SEM evaluation of dentin bonding systems to different dentin substrates. J. Dent. Res. 1994 Jan;73(1):44-55. doi: 10.1177/00220345940730010601.
Zhang L, Wang D-y, Fan J, Li F, Chen Y-j, Chen J-h. Stability of bonds made to superficial vs. deep dentin, before and after thermocycling. Dent Mater J. 2014 Nov;30(11):1245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.08.362.
Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent. 2014 Jul;42(7):800-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.012.
Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Wilwerding T, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Interfacial characteristics and bond durability of universal adhesive to various substrates. Oper. Dent. 2017;42(2):E59-E70. doi: 10.2341/15-353-L.
Sadr A, Ghasemi A, Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effects of storage time and temperature on the properties of two self-etching systems. J Dent. 2007 Mar;35(3):218-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.08.004.
Harnirattisai C, Roengrungreang P, Rangsisiripaiboon U, Senawongse P. Shear and micro-shear bond strengths of four self-etching adhesives measured immediately and 24 hours after application. Dent Mater J. 2012;31(5):779-87. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2012-013.
Cheetham JJ, Palamara JE, Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. A comparison of the micro-shear bond strength and failure mode of non-enclosed and mold-enclosed luting cements bonded to metal. Dent Mater J. 2013;32(6):896-905. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2013-065.
Lafuente D. SEM analysis of hybrid layer and bonding interface after chlorhexidine use. Oper. Dent. 2012;37(2):172-80. doi: 10.2341/10-251-L.
Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater J. 2011 Jan;27(1):17-28. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023.
Costa DM, Somacal DC, Borges GA, Spohr AM. Bond capability of universal adhesive systems to dentin in self-etch mode after short-term storage and cyclic loading. Open Dent J. 2017 Jun 30;11:276-83. doi: 10.2174/1874210601711010276.
Lee I-S, Son S, Hur B, Kwon Y-H, Park J-K. The effect of additional etching and curing mechanism of composite resin on the dentin bond strength. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013 Nov;5(4):479-84. doi: 10.4047/jap.2013.5.4.479.
Pleffken PR, de Almeida Lourenco AP, Torres C, Buhler Borges A. Influence of application methods of self-etching adhesive systems on adhesive bond strength to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2011 Dec;13(6):517-25. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a21417.
Fortin D, Swift Jr EJ, Denehy GE, Reinhardt JW. Bond strength and microleakage of current dentin adhesives. Dent Mater J. 1994 Jul;10(4):253-8. doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(94)90070-1.
Wakefield CW, Draughn RA, Sneed WD, Davis TN. Shear bond strengths of six bonding systems using the pushout method of in vitro testing. Oper. Dent. 1998;23(2):69-76.
Haller B. Recent developments in dentin bonding. Am J Dent. 2000 Feb;13(1):44-50.
Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. "No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhesives--a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater J. 2001 Sep;17(5):373-80. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(00)00084-1.
Baracco B, Fuentes MV, Garrido MA, González-López S, Ceballos L. Effect of thermal aging on the tensile bond strength at reduced areas of seven current adhesives. Odontology. 2013 Jul;101(2):177-85. doi: 10.1007/s10266-012-0073-2.
Carvalho CN, Francci CE, Costa JF, Bauer J. Effect of filler and application mode on micro-shear bond strength of etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Rev Port Estomatol Cir Maxilofac. 2015;56(2):89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.rpemd.2015.05.002.
Lawson NC, Robles A, Fu CC, Lin CP, Sawlani K, Burgess JO. Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent. 2015 Oct;43(10):1229-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.009.
Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Hayakawa S, Torii Y, Ogawa T, et al. Self-assembled nano-layering at the adhesive interface. J. Dent. Res. 2012 Apr;91(4):376-81. doi: 10.1177/0022034512437375.
Hass V, Dobrovolski M, Zander-Grande C, Martins GC, Gordillo LA, Rodrigues Accorinte Mde L, et al. Correlation between degree of conversion, resin-dentin bond strength and nanoleakage of simplified etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater J. 2013 Sep;29(9):921-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.05.001.
Papadogiannis D, Dimitriadi M, Zafiropoulou M, Gaintantzopoulou M-D, Eliades G. Universal adhesives: setting characteristics and reactivity with dentin. Materials (Basel). 2019 May 27;12(10):1720. doi: 10.3390/ma12101720.
Hashimoto M, Fujita S, Endo K, Ohno H. In vitro degradation of resin–dentin bonds with one‐bottle self‐etching adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Oct;117(5):611-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00664.x.
Kim J, Chae S, Lee Y, Han G, Cho B. Effects of multipurpose, universal adhesives on resin bonding to zirconia ceramic. Oper Dent. 2015;40(1):55-62. doi: 10.2341/13-303-L.
De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, et al. Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives bonded to Class-I cavity-bottom dentin after thermo-cycling. Dent Mater J. 2005 Nov;21(11):999-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.11.005.
Morresi AL, D'Amario M, Capogreco M, Gatto R, Marzo G, D'Arcangelo C, et al. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? a literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Jan;29:295-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.09.013.
Amaral FL, Colucci V, Palma-Dibb RG, Corona SA. Assessment of in vitro methods used to promote adhesive interface degradation: a critical review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007;19(6):340-53; discussion 354. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00134.x.
Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent. 1999 Feb;27(2):89-99. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(98)00037-2.
Abo-Hamar SE, Hiller KA, Jung H, Federlin M, Friedl KH, Schmalz G. Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Investig. 2005 Sep;9(3):161-7. doi: 10.1007/s00784-005-0308-5.
Shirai K, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Lambrechts P, Suzuki K, et al. Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater J, 2005 Feb;21(2):110-24. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.01.003.
Helvatjoglu‐Antoniades M, Koliniotou‐Kubia E, Dionyssopoulos P. The effect of thermal cycling on the bovine dentine shear bond strength of current adhesive systems. J. Oral Rehabil. 2004 Sep;31(9):911-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01318.x.
Fanning DE, Wakefield CW, Robbins JW, Bagley AL. Effect of a filled adhesive on bond strength in three dentinal bonding systems. Gen Dent. 1995;43(3):256-62.
Ermis RB, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, Coutinho E, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, et al. Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin prepared with three different diamond burs. Dent Mater J. 2008 Jul;24(7):978-85. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.019.
Perdigao J, Sezinando A, Monteiro PC. Laboratory bonding ability of a multi-purpose dentin adhesive. Am J Dent. 2012;25(3):153-8.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Downloads
