Banner Portal
Diagnostic properties of sensitivity changes in patients with maxillofacial fractures
PDF

Keywords

Facial injuries
Zygomatic fractures
Jaw fracture
Somatosensory disorders
Sensation disorders
Systematic reviews as topic

How to Cite

1.
Rodrigues EC, Wendland EMDR, Vidor DCGM, Santos KW dos. Diagnostic properties of sensitivity changes in patients with maxillofacial fractures: a systematic review. Braz. J. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2021 Jun. 11 [cited 2024 Apr. 26];20(00):e211223. Available from: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8661223

Abstract

Aim: Verify the accuracy of objective assessments compared to subjective tests in detecting changes in somatosensory perception in individuals affected by maxillofacial trauma. Methods: The review (PROSPERO n ° CRD42019125546) used the databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane, EMBASE, LILACS and other bibliographic resources. Prospective and retrospective studies that used objective and subjective methods of assessing facial sensitivity in maxillofacial fractures were included. There was no restriction on language or publication date. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2. Data extraction and analysis were performed using a form developed for the study. Results: 21 studies were included. The clinical objective examination mainly includes assessments of: tactile sensitivity (95.24%) and nociceptive sensitivity (57.14%). The subjective assessment was based on the patient’s report, spontaneously (61.90%), guided by structured questionnaires (33.33%) and/or using scales (9.52%) to measure the degree of impairment. In risk of bias assessment, were observed no adequate interpretation and classification of changes in subjective sensitivity, subject to inappropriate analysis of the data. In addition, the studies bring several instruments without standardization for assessing sensory modalities. Conclusion: The objective assessment is a complement to the subjective assessment, using the touch assessment as the main parameter in the profile of the facial peripheral integrity, associated or not with nociceptive assessment. Lack of consensus on the indication of specific instruments for testing is a limiting factor. Thus, based on the studies, is proposed a minimum battery of sensitivity assessment to obtain an overview of the patient’s peripheral nervous situation. 

https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8661223
PDF

References

Bogusiak K, Arkuszewski P. Characteristics and epidemiology of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2010 Jul;21(4):1018-23. doi: 10.1097/scs.0b013e3181e62e47.

Lalloo R, Lucchesi LR, Bisignano C, Castle CD, Dingels ZV, Fox JT, et al. Epidemiology of facial fractures: incidence, prevalence and years lived with disability estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2017 study. Inj Prev. 2020 Oct;26(Supp 1):i27-i35. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043297.

Allareddy V, Allareddy V, Nalliah RP. Epidemiology of facial fracture injuries. J Oral and Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Oct;69(10):2613-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.057.

Siemionow M, Gharb BB, Rampazzo A. The Face as a sensory organ. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Feb;127(2):652-62. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181fed6fd.

Devine M, Hirani M, Durham J, Nixdorf DR, Renton T. Identifying criteria for diagnosis of post-traumatic pain and altered sensation of the maxillary and mandibular branches of the trigeminal nerve: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018 Jun;125(6):526-40. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2017.12.020.

Said-Yekta S, Smeets R, Esteves-Oliveira M, Stein JM, Riediger D, Lampert F. Verification of nerve integrity after surgical intervention using Quantitative Sensory Testing. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Feb;70(2):263-71. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.03.065.

McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD, McGrath TA, Bossuyt PM, Clifford T, et al. Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement. JAMA. 2018 Jan 23;319(4):388-396. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19163. Erratum in: JAMA. 2019 Nov 26;322(20):2026.

Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct;155(8):529-36. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009.

Faria JCM, Freitas RS, Busnardo FF, Munhoz AM, Fogaça WC, Alonso N, et al. [Evaluation of the sensibility of the infraorbital nerve in patients with zygoma fractures]. Folha Med. 1997;114(1):19-23. Portuguese.

Moritz M, Niederdellmann H, Dammer R. [Involvement of the trigeminal nerve in fractures of the face]. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 1995;96(1):46-9. French.

Sajjadian A, Alvi A, Janjua TA, Vartanian J, Friedman CD. Mandibular trauma reconstruction using three-dimensional miniplating system. J Cranio-Maxillofac Trauma. 2000;6(3):33-8.

Thurmüller P, Dodson TB, Kaban LB. Nerve injuries associated with facial trauma: Natural history, management, and outcomes of repair. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2001;13(2):283-93.

Anchlia S, Dhuvad JM, Shukla D, Kumar R, Patel N, Nagavadiya V. Novel use of orbita plates in mandibular body fractures. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2018 Dec;17(4):557-62. doi: 10.1007/s12663-018-1082-7.

Neovius E, Fransson M, Persson C, Clarliden S, Farnebo F, Lundgren TK. Long-term sensory disturbances after orbitozygomatic fractures. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Jan;70(1):120-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.09.007.

Okochi M, Ueda K, Mochizuki Y, Okochi H. How can paresthesia after zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture be determined after long-term follow-up? A new and quantitative evaluation method using Current Perception Threshold Testing. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Aug;73(8):1554-61. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.02.029.

Scott RA, Teo N, Perry M. Displacement of mandibular fractures: is there a correlation with sensory loss and recovery? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 May;43(5):555-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.11.007.

Mayrink G, Moreira RWF, Araujo, MM. Prospective study of postoperative sensory disturbances after surgical treatment of mandibular fractures. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 17(1):27–31, 2012 doi:10.1007/s10006-012-0328-7 .

Bagheri SC, Meyer RA, Khan HA, Steed MB. Microsurgical repair of peripheral trigeminal nerve injuries from maxillofacial trauma. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Mar;17(1):27-31. doi: 10.1007/s10006-012-0328-7.

Sakavicius D, Juodzbalys G, Kubilius R, Sabalys GP. Investigation of infraorbital nerve injury following zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Dec;35(12):903-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01888.x.

Barry CP, Kearns GJ. Superior border plating technique in the management of isolated mandibular angle fractures: a retrospective study of 50 consecutive patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Aug;65(8):1544-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.069.

Iizuka T, Lindqvist C. Sensory disturbances associated with rigid internal fixation of mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1991 Dec;49(12):1264-8. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(91)90301-2.

Fogaça WC, Fereirra MC, Dellon, AL. Infraorbital nerve injury associated with zygoma fractures: documentation with neurosensory testing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Mar;113(3):834-8. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000105335.41930.41.

Fayazi S, Bayat M, Bayat-Movahed S, Sadr-Eshkevari P, Rashad A. Long-term outcome assessment of closed treatment of mandibular fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2013 May;24(3):735-9. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182801373.

Siddiqui A, Markose G, Moos KF, McMahon J, Ayoub AF. One miniplate versus two in the management of mandibular angle fractures: a prospective randomised study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Apr;45(3):223-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2006.08.016.

McGimpsey JG, Vaidya A, Biagioni PA, Lamey PJ. Role of thermography in the assessment of infraorbital nerve injury after malar fractures. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Dec;38(6):581-4. doi: 10.1054/bjom.2000.0524.

Vriens JPM, van der Glas HW, Bosman F, Koole R, Moos KF. Information on infraorbital nerve damage from multitesting of sensory function. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998 Feb;27(1):20-6. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(98)80090-8.

Kipper JF, Forgiarini TS, Reinert LL, Pacher GT, Magnabosco Neto AE. [Sensitivity assessment objective versus objective after fracture of zygoma]. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2016;45(5):265-70. Portuguese. doi: 10.1590/1807-2577.15615.

Fogaça WC, Alonso N, Naufal RR, Ferreira MC. [Late evaluation of facial sensibility post orbitozygomatic complex fractures]. Rev Soc Bras Cir Craniomaxilofac. 2008;11(4):119-25. Portuguese.

Kesarwani A, Antonyshyn O, Mackinnon SE, Gruss JS, Novak C, Kelly L. Facial sensibility testing in the normal and posttraumatic population. Ann Plast Surg. 1989 May;22(5):416-25. doi: 10.1097/00000637-198905000-00006.

Abd El-Kader AA, Azmy RM, Mahmoud GA, Allam KM, Hassanien HR. Infraorbital nerve assessment after fixation of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Egyptian J Neurol Psychiat Neurosurg. 2011;48(4):399-403.

Leonhardt H, Meinecke D, Gerlach KL. Quantitative evaluation of thermosensitivity in patients with mandibular fractures. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2005 Sep;9(5):312-6. doi: 10.1007/s10006-005-0631-7.

Marzola C, Pastori CM, Toledo JLF, Zorzetto DLG, Sant’anna AJ. [Paresthesias of the infraorbital nerve in fractures of the middle third of the face]. Rev Eletron Odontol Acad Tiradentes Odontol. 2006;6(1):153-73. Portuguese.

Ahmed SS, Afshan B, Hashmi GS, Hashmi SH. Neurosensory deficit in cases of zygomatic complex fractures. Curr Neurobiol. 2010;1(1):51-4.

Boyette JR. Facial fractures in children. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2014 Oct;47(5):747-61. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2014.06.008.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.