Banner Portal
Surface treatment and adhesion approaches on polymer-infiltrated ceramic network
PDF

Keywords

Ceramics
Hydrofluoric Acid
Adhesives
Air abrasion, dental
Resin cements
Surface properties

How to Cite

1.
May MM, Rodrigues C da S, da Rosa JB, Herrmann JP, May LG. Surface treatment and adhesion approaches on polymer-infiltrated ceramic network: influence on the bond strength to resin cement. Braz. J. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2021 Feb. 8 [cited 2024 May 10];20(00):e211670. Available from: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8661670

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effect of different surface treatments and adhesive approaches on the microshear bond strength of resin cement to a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN). Methods: PICN blocks were randomly assigned into 9 groups (n=10): CTRL: no treatment; HF: 5% hydrofluoric acid etching; HF-S: HF + silane; HF-S-A: HF-S + adhesive (Adper Single Bond 2); HF-UA: HF + universal adhesive (Single Bond Universal); SB: sandblasting with 50 μm Al2O3 particles; SB-S: SB + silane; SB-S-A: SB-S + adhesive; SB-UA: SB + universal adhesive. Resin cement microcylinders (Ø = 0.96 mm; height = 1 mm) (RelyX Ultimate) were built upon the PICN surface after roughness and contact angle measurements. Next, microshear bonding tests (μSBS) were performed (0.5 mm/min) after water storage (37ºC, 90 days) and thermocycling (12,000 cycles; 5ºC-55ºC). Failure modes were observed under stereomicroscope. Bond strength data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA/Tukey’s test and t-tests. Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn’s tests were conducted for roughness and contact angle data (α = 0.05). Results: A rougher surface and lower contact angles were observed for Sandblasting. HF-S (18.54 ± 2.03 MPa), SB-S (19.00 ± 1.66 MPa) and SB-UA (18.07 ± 2.36 MPa) provided the highest bond strength values, followed by the other treated groups. The CTRL group resulted in lower bond strength (7.18 ± 2.34 MPa). Conclusion: Hydrofluoric acid etching followed by silane application and sandblasting followed by silane or universal adhesive are useful clinical steps to enhance bonding to PICN. Adhesive applications after HF etching have no advantages in bonding to PICN.  

https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8661670
PDF

References

Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater. 2013 Apr;29(4):419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.01.002.

Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Oct;114(4):587-93. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.016.

Mainjot AK, Dupont NM, Oudkerk JC, Dewael TY, Sadoun MJ. From artisanal to CAD-CAM blocks: state of the art of indirect composites. J Dent Res. 2016 May;95(5):487-95. doi: 10.1177/0022034516634286.

Schwenter J, Schmidli F, Weiger R, Fischer J. Adhesive bonding to polymer infiltrated ceramic. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(5):796-802. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2015-271.

Subaşi MG, Alp G. Repair bond strengths of non-aged and aged resin nanoceramics. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Oct;9(5):364-70. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.5.364.

Vita Enamic®. Vita Enamic Working Instructions. [cited 2020 Jul 20]. Available from: https://www.vita-zahnfabrik.com/en/VITA-ENAMIC-24970.html.

Özcan M, Volpato CAM. Surface conditioning and bonding protocol for polymer-infiltrated ceramic: how and why? J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(2):174-5. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a35979.

Facenda JC, Borba M, Corazza PH. A literature review on the new polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material (PICN). J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 Jul;30(4):281-6. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12370.

Spitznagel FA, Horvath SD, Guess PC, Blatz MB. Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: a review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014;26(6):382-93. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12100.

Barutcigil K, Barutcigil C, Kul E, Özarslan MM, Buyukkaplan US. Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength of resin cement to a CAD/CAM restorative material. J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):71-8. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12574.

Elsaka SE. Bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement: the effect of surface treatments. J Adhes Dent. 2014 Dec;16(6):531-40. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a33198.

Bayazıt EÖ. Microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to CAD/CAM resin-matrix ceramics prepared with different surface treatments. Int J Prosthodont. 2019;32(32):433-8. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6268.

Yu H, Özcan M, Yoshida K, Cheng H, Sawase T. Bonding to industrial indirect composite blocks: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2020 Jan;36(1):119-34. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.11.002.

Soares CJ, Giannini M, Oliveira MT, Paulillo LAMS, Martins LRM. Effect of surface treatments of laboratory-fabricated composites on the microtensile bond strength to a luting resin cement. J Appl Oral Sci. 2004 Mar;12(1):45-50. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572004000100009.

Eldafrawy M, Ebroin MG, Gailly PA, Nguyen J-F, Sadoun MJ, Mainjot AK. Bonding to CAD-CAM composites: an interfacial fracture toughness approach. J Dent Res. 2018 Jan;97(1):60-7. doi: 10.1177/0022034517728714.

Emsermann I, Eggmann F, Krastl G, Weiger R, Amato J. Influence of pretreatment methods on the adhesion of composite and polymer infiltrated ceramic CAD-CAM blocks. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(5):433-43. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a43179.

Yoshida K, Kamada K, Atsuta M. Effects of two silane coupling agents, a bonding agent, and thermal cycling on the bond strength of a CAD/CAM composite material cemented with two resin luting agents. J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Feb;85(2):184-9. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.113628.

Matinlinna JP, Lassila LV, Özcan M, Yli-Urpo A, Vallittu PK. An introduction to silanes and their clinical applications in dentistry. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17(2):155-64.

Awad MM, Albedaiwi L, Almahdy A, Khan R, Silikas N, Hatamleh MM, et al. Effect of universal adhesives on microtensile bond strength to hybrid ceramic. BMC Oral Health. 2019 Aug;19(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0865-7.

Strasser T, Preis V, Behr M, Rosentritt M. Roughness, surface energy and superficial damages of CAD/CAM materials after surface treatment. Clin Oral Invest. 2018 Nov;22(8):2787-97. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2365-6.

Alp G, Subaşi MG, Johnston WM, Yilmaz B. Effect of different resin cements and surface treatments on the shear bond strength of ceramic-glass polymer materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Sep;120(3):454-61. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.12.016.

Rohr N, Flury A. Fischer J. Efficacy of a universal adhesive in the bond strength of composite cements to polymer-infiltrated ceramic. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(5):417-24. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a39277.

Sagsoz O, Sagsoz NP, Yurtcan MT, Ozcelik N. Hydroxyapatite coating effect on the bond strength between CAD/ CAM materials and a resin cement. Odontology. 2019 Oct;107(4):491-9. doi: 10.1007/s10266-019-00420-y.

Campos F, Almeida CS, Rippe MP, de Melo RM, Valandro LF, Bottino MA. Resin bonding to a hybrid ceramic: effects of surface treatments and aging. Oper Dent. 2016;41(2):171-8. doi: 10.2341/15-057-L.

Mine A, Kabetani T, Kawaguchi-Uemura A, Higashi M, Yuko T, Hagino R, et al. Effectiveness of current adhesive systems when bonding to CAD/CAM indirect resin materials: A review of 32 publications. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2019 Nov;55(1):41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2018.10.001.

Lise DP, Van Ende A, De Munck J, Vieira LCC, Baratieri LN, Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of composite cement to novel CAD/CAM materials as a function of surface treatment and aging. Oper Dent. 2017;42(1):73-81. doi: 10.2341/15-263-L.

Peumans M, Valjakova EB, De Munck J, Mishevska CB, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding effectiveness of luting composites to different CAD/CAM materials. J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(4):289-302. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a36155.

Marchesi G, Frassetto A, Mazzoni A, Apolonio F, Diolosà M, Cadenaro M, et al. Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study. J Dent. 2014 May;42(5):603-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.008.

ISO 4287. Geometrical product specifications (GPS) – surface texture: profile method, terms definitions and surface texture parameters. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 1997.

Prochnow C, Venturini AB, Grasel R, Gundel A, Bottino MC, Valandro LF. Adhesion to a lithium disilicate glass ceramic etched with hydrofluoric acid at distinct concentrations. Braz Dent J. 2018 Sep-Oct;29(5):492-9. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201802080.

Tedesco TK, Montagner AF, Skupien JA, Soares FZ, Susin AH, Rocha RO. Starch tubing: an alternative method to build up microshear bond test specimens. J Adhes Dent. 2013 Aug;15(4):311-5. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a28602.

Cekic-Nagas I, Ergun G, Egilmez F, Vallittu PK, Lassila LVJ. Micro-shear bond strength of different resin cements to ceramic/glass-polymer CAD-CAM block materials. J Prosthodont Res. 2016 Oct;60(4):265-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2016.02.003.

Silva PNF, Martinelli-Lobo CM, Bottino MA, Melo RM, Valandro L.F. Bond strength between a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network and a composite for repair: effect of several ceramic surface treatments. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e28. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0028.

Elsaka SE. Repair bond strength of resin composite to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic using different repair systems. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(2):161-7. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2014-159.

Demirtag Z, Culhaoglu AK. Surface roughness of ceramic-resin composites after femtosecond laser irradiation, sandblasting or acid etching and their bond strength with and without silanization to a resin cement. Oper Dent. 2019;44(2):156-67. doi: 10.2341/17-391-L.

El-Damanhoury HM, Gaintantzopoulou MD. Self-etching ceramic primer versus hydrofluoric acid etching: etching efficacy and bonding performance. J Prosthodont Res. 2018 Jan;62(1):75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.06.002.

Spitznagel FA, Scholz KJ, Vach K, Gierthmuehlen PC. Monolithic polymer-infiltrated ceramic network CAD/CAM single crowns: three-year mid-term results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Prosthodont. 2020;33(2):160-8. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6548.

Oudkerk J, Eldafrawy M, Bekaert S, Grenade C, Vanheusden A, Mainjot A. The one-step no-prep approach for full-mouth rehabilitation of worn dentition using PICN CAD-CAM restorations: 2-yr results of a prospective clinical study. J Dent. 2020 Jan;92:103245. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103245.

3M ESPE. AdperTM Single Bond 2 Adhesive. Saint Paul: 3M Center; 2004 [2020 Jul 10]. Available from: https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/276868O/adper-single-bond-2-technical-profile.pdf.

3M ESPE. RelyXTM Ultimate Adhesive Resin Cement. Technical Data Sheet. [cited 2020 Jul 10]. Available from: https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/783784O/3m-relyx-ultimate-adhesive-resin-cement-technical-data-sheet.pdf.

3M Ciência Aplicada à vidaTM . Adesivo 3M Single Bond Universal. Saint Paul: 3M Oral Care; 2017 [cited 2020 Jul 10]. Available from: https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/1376776O/sbu-4-pages-brochure-pt-la.pdf.

Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Sonoda A, Maruo Y, Makita Y, Okihara T, et al. Effectiveness and stability of silane coupling agent incorporated in ‘universal’ adhesives. Dent Mater. 2016 Oct;32(10):1218-25. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.07.002.

Romanini-Junior JC, Kumagai RY, Ortega LF, Rodrigues JA, Cassoni A, Hirata R, et al. Adhesive/silane application effects on bond strength durability to a lithium disilicate ceramic. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 Jul;30(4):346-51. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12387.

Alrahlah A, Awad MM, Vohra F, Al-Mudahi A, Al jeaidi ZA, Elsharawy M. Effect of self etching ceramic primer and universal adhesive on bond strength of lithium disilicate ceramic. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2017;31(23):2611–9. doi: 10.1080/01694243.2017.1312079.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.