Keywords
Angle Class II
Orthodontic anchorage procedures
How to Cite
Abstract
Aim: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of miniscrews in Class I and II Malocclusion Patients. Methods: From electronic databases, between 2010 and 2020, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ISI were used to conduct systematic literature. Two reviewers extracted data blindly and independently from the abstract and full text of the studies they used for data extraction. The mean differences between the two groups (miniscrews vs. conventional anchorage) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI), the Inverse-variance method, and the fixed-effect model were calculated. The Meta-analysis was evaluated using the statistical software Stata/MP v.16 (The fastest version of Stata). Results: A total of 186 potentially relevant titles and abstracts were found during the electronic and manual search. Finally, the inclusion criteria required for this systematic review were met by a total of seven publications. The mean difference of molar mesiodistal movement among seven studies and heterogeneity was -0.53 mm (MD, -0.53 95 % CI -0.69, -0.38. P= 0.00) (I2 = 96.52 %). This result showed maximum reinforcement in miniscrews with fewer mesial movements. Conclusion: The result of the current systematic review and meta-analysis shows that miniscrews in patients with class II and I malocclusion help maintain better anchorage preservation than traditional anchorage devices.
References
Batista KB, Thiruvenkatachari B, Harrison JE, O'Brien KD. Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar;3(3):CD003452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub4.
Khela S, Newton JT, Jeremiah HG. The effect of malocclusion on dating prospects. J Orthod. 2020 Mar;47(1):30-7. doi: 10.1177/1465312519888926.
Papadopoulos MA, Papageorgiou SN, Zogakis IP. Clinical effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2011 Aug;90(8):969-76. doi: 10.1177/0022034511409236.
Tak M, Nagarajappa R, Sharda AJ, Asawa K, Tak A, Jalihal S, et al. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment needs among 12-15 years old school children of Udaipur, India. Eur J Dent. 2013 Sep;7(Suppl 1):S045-53. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.119071.
Sanadhya S, Chadha M, Chaturvedi MK, Chaudhary M, Lerra S, Meena MK, et al. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment needs among 12-15-year-old schoolchildren of fishermen of Kutch coast, Gujarat, India. Int Marit Health. 2014;65(3):106-13. doi: 10.5603/IMH.2014.0023.
Liu Y, Yang ZJ, Zhou J, Xiong P, Wang Q, Yang Y,et al. Comparison of anchorage efficiency of orthodontic mini-implant and conventional anchorage reinforcement in patients requiring maximum orthodontic anchorage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2020 Jun;20(2):101401. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2020.101401.
Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T, Kyung HM, Takano-Yamamoto T. Class II malocclusion treated with miniscrew anchorage: comparison with traditional orthodontic mechanics outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Mar;135(3):302-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.038.
Becker K, Pliska A, Busch C, Wilmes B, Wolf M, Drescher D. Efficacy of orthodontic mini implants for en masse retraction in the maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Implant Dent. 2018 Oct;4(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40729-018-0144-4.
Sfondrini MF, Gandini P, Alcozer R, Vallittu PK, Scribante A. Failure load and stress analysis of orthodontic miniscrews with different transmucosal collar diameter. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Nov;87:132-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.07.032.
Jing Z, Wu Y, Jiang W, Zhao L, Jing D, Zhang N, et al. Factors affecting the clinical success rate of miniscrew implants for orthodontic treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):835-41. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4197.
Yeke W, Ranran G, Yuling Z, Jianfeng Y, Lixing Z, Wenhan N, et al., Factors affecting the clinical success rate of miniscrew implants for orthodontic treatment. Chin J Tissue Eng Res. 2020;24(4):538-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.1925.
Mizrahi E. The Use of Miniscrews in Orthodontics: a Review of Selected Clinical Applications. Prim Dent J. 2016 Nov;5(4):20-7. doi: 10.1308/205016816820209569.
Magkavali-Trikka P, Emmanouilidis G, Papadopoulos MA. Mandibular molar uprighting using orthodontic miniscrew implants: a systematic review. Prog Orthod. 2018 Jan;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0200-2.
Park JJ, Park YC, Lee KJ, Cha JY, Tahk JH, Choi YJ. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes after miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion in young adults: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Korean J Orthod. 2017 Mar;47(2):77-86. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2017.47.2.77.
Liu H, Lv T, Wang NN, Zhao F, Wang KT, Liu DX. Drift characteristics of miniscrews and molars for anchorage under orthodontic force: 3-dimensional computed tomography registration evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Jan;139(1):e83-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.07.018.
Chen Y, Liu D. Morphologic evaluation of root resorption after miniscrew assisted en mass retraction in adult bialveolar protrusion patients. Head Face Med. 2020 Jul 27;16(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13005-020-00229-z.
Barthélemi S, Desoutter A, Souaré F, Cuisinier F. Effectiveness of anchorage with temporary anchorage devices during anterior maxillary tooth retraction: A randomized clinical trial. Korean J Orthod. 2019 Sep;49(5):279-85. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2019.49.5.279.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010 Sep;25(9):603-5. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z.
Chopra SS, Mukherjee M, Mitra R, Kochar GD, Kadu A. Comparative evaluation of anchorage reinforcement between orthodontic implants and conventional anchorage in orthodontic management of bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Med J Armed Forces India. 2017 Apr;73(2):159-66. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.01.003.
Chen M, Li ZM, Liu X, Cai B, Wang DW, Feng ZC. Differences of treatment outcomes between self-ligating brackets with microimplant and headgear anchorages in adults with bimaxillary protrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Apr;147(4):465-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.11.029.
Sandler J, Murray A, Thiruvenkatachari B, Gutierrez R, Speight P, O'Brien K. Effectiveness of 3 methods of anchorage reinforcement for maximum anchorage in adolescents: A 3-arm multicenter randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jul;146(1):10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.03.020.
Al-Sibaie S, Hajeer MY. Assessment of changes following en-masse retraction with mini-implants anchorage compared to two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with class II division 1 malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2014 Jun;36(3):275-83. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjt046.
Park HM, Kim BH, Yang IH, Baek SH. Preliminary three-dimensional analysis of tooth movement and arch dimension change of the maxillary dentition in Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with first premolar extraction: conventional anchorage vs. mini-implant anchorage. Korean J Orthod. 2012 Dec;42(6):280-90. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2012.42.6.280.
Koyama I, Iino S, Abe Y, Takano-Yamamoto T, Miyawaki S. Differences between sliding mechanics with implant anchorage and straight-pull headgear and intermaxillary elastics in adults with bimaxillary protrusion. Eur J Orthod. 2011 Apr;33(2):126-31. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq047.
Lee AY, Kim YH. Comparison of Movement of the Upper Dentition According to Anchorage Method: Orthodontic Mini-Implant versus Conventional Anchorage Reinforcement in Class I Malocclusion. ISRN Dent. 2011;2011:321206. doi: 10.5402/2011/321206.
Consolaro A. Mini-implants and miniplates generate sub-absolute and absolute anchorage. Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 May-Jun;19(3):20-3. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.3.020-023.oin.
Horiuchi A, Hotokezaka H, Kobayashi K. Correlation between cortical plate proximity and apical root resorption. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Sep;114(3):311-8. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70214-8.
Hujoel PP. Levels of clinical significance. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2004;1(4):32-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2004.02.012.
Feu D, Miguel JA, Celeste RK, Oliveira BH. Effect of orthodontic treatment on oral health-related quality of life. Angle Orthod. 2013 Sep;83(5):892-8. doi: 10.2319/100412-781.1.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Downloads
