Banner Portal
Color and translucency stability of CAD/CAM restorative materials
PDF

Keywords

Color
Ceramics
Composite resins
Computer-aided design
Materials testing
Surface properties

How to Cite

1.
Dalforno RF, Auzani ML, Zucuni CP, Rodrigues C da S, May LG. Color and translucency stability of CAD/CAM restorative materials. Braz. J. Oral Sci. [Internet]. 2021 Nov. 29 [cited 2024 Aug. 2];21(00):e224265. Available from: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8664265

Abstract

Aim: This study assessed the color and translucency stability of a polymer infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) and compared it with a resin composite (RC) and a feldspathic ceramic (FEL). Methods: Disc-shaped samples of a PICN (Vita Enamic), a feldspathic ceramic (Vitablocks Mark II), and a resin composite (Brava block) were prepared from CAD/CAM blocks. PICN and RC surfaces were finished with a sequence of polishing discs and diamond paste. FEL samples received a glaze layer. The samples were subjected to 30-min immersions in red wine twice a day for 30 days. CIEL*a*b* coordinates were assessed with a spectrophotometer at baseline and after 15 and 30 days of immersion. Color alteration (ΔE00) and translucency parameter (TP00) were calculated with CIEDE2000. Average roughness was measured before the staining procedures. Color difference and translucency data were analyzed with repeated-measures ANOVA and Tukey’s tests. Roughness was analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: Roughness was similar among the experimental groups. All materials had their color alteration significantly increased from 15 to 30 days of staining. PICN reached an intermediate ΔE00 between FEL and RC at 15 days. PICN revealed a color alteration as high as the composite after 30 days. No statistical difference was observed regarding translucency. Conclusion: PICN was not as color stable as the feldspathic ceramic at the end of the study. Its color alteration was comparable to the resin composite when exposed to red wine. However, the translucency of the tested materials was stable throughout the 30-day staining.

https://doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v21i00.8664265
PDF

References

Stawarczyk B, Sener B, Trottmann A, Roos M, Ozcan M, Hammerle CHF. Discoloration of manually fabricated resins and industrially fabricated CAD/CAM blocks versus glass-ceramic: effect of storage media, duration, and subsequent polishing. Dent Mater J. 2012 May;31(3):377-83. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2011-238.

Albero A, Pascual A, Camps I, Grau-Benitez M. Comparative characterization of a novel cad-cam polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015 Oct;7(4):e495-500. doi: 10.4317/jced.52521.

Vanoorbeek S, Vandamme K, Lijnen I, Naert I. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study. Int J Prosthodont. 2010 May-Jun;23(3):223-30.

Borba M, de Araujo MD, Fukushima KA, Yoshimura HN, Cesar PF, Griggs JA, et al. Effect of the microstructure on the lifetime of dental ceramics. Dent Mater. 2011 Jul;27(7):710-21. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.04.003

Gonzaga CC, Yoshimura HN, Cesar PF, Miranda WG. Subcritical crack growth in porcelains, glass-ceramics, and glass-infiltrated alumina composite for dental restorations. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009 May;20(5):1017-24. doi: 10.1007/s10856-008-3667-z.

Venturini AB, Prochnow C, Pereira GKR, Segala RD, Kleverlaan CJ, Valandro LF. Fatigue performance of adhesively cemented glass-, hybrid- and resin-ceramic materials for CAD/CAM monolithic restorations. Dent Mater. 2019 Apr;35(4):534-42. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.01.013.

Vita Enamic – Technical and scientific documentation. Bad Sackingen: Vita Zahnfabrik. [cited 2021 Mar 10]. Available from: https://cdn.vivarep.com/contrib/vivarep/media/pdf/4_4642_ENAMICTechnicalandScientific_20170830205744578.pdf.

Dellazzana FZ, Rodrigues CS, Mallmann A, Jacques LB. Optical Properties of a Glass Ceramic and an Indirect Resin Composite: Effects of Polishing and Staining. J Health Sci. 2019 Dec;21(5):6. doi: https://doi.org/10.17921/2447-8938.2019v21n5p512-517.

Stawarczyk B, Liebermann A, Eichberger M, Guth JF. Evaluation of mechanical and optical behavior of current esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM composites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015 Mar;55:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.10.004.

Ardu S, Braut V, Gutemberg D, Krejci I, Dietschi D, Feilzer AJ. A long-term laboratory test on staining susceptibility of esthetic composite resin materials. Quintessence Int. 2010 Sep;41(8):695-702.

Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent. 2005 May;33(5):389-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.10.018.

Kelly JR. Dental ceramics: what is this stuff anyway? J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Sep;139 Suppl:4S-7S. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0359.

Barutcugil C, Bilgili D, Barutcigil K, Dündar A, Büyükkaplan US, Yilmaz B. Discoloration and translucency changes of CAD-CAM materials after exposure to beverages. J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Sep;122(3):325-31. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.009.

Quek SHQ, Yap AUJ, Rosa V, Tan KBC, Teoh KH. Effect of staining beverages on color and translucency of CAD/CAM composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 Mar;30(2):E9-E17. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12359.

Seyidaliyeva A, Rues S, Evagorou Z, Hassel AJ, Rammelsberg P, Zenthöfer A. Color stability of polymer-infiltrated-ceramics compared with lithium disilicate ceramics and composite. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Jan;32(1):43-50. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12525.

Sulaiman TA, Suliman AA, Mohamed EA, Rodgers B, Altak A, Johnston WM. Optical properties of bisacryl-, composite-, ceramic- resin restorative materials: an aging simulation study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Sep;33(6):913-8. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12653.

Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Bona AD, Igiel C, Linninger M, et al. Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;27 Suppl 1:S1-9. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12149.

Salas M, Lucena C, Herrera LJ, Yebra A, Della Bona A, Pérez MM. Translucency thresholds for dental materials. Dent Mater. 2018 Aug;34(8):1168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.05.001.

Demarco FF, Collares K, Coelho-de-Souza FH, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, et al. Anterior composite restorations: A systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure. Dent Mater. 2015 Oct;31(10):1214-24. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.005.

Morimoto S, Albanesi RB, Sesma N, Agra CM, Braga MM. Main Clinical Outcomes of feldspathic porcelain and glass-ceramic laminate veneers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and complication rates. Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):38-49. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4315.

Chirumamilla G, Goldstein CE, Lawson NC. A 2-year Retrospective Clinical study of Enamic Crowns Performed in a Private Practice Setting. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016 Jul;28(4):231-7. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12206.

Spitznagel FA, Scholz KJ, Vach K, Gierthmuehlen PC. Monolithic polymer-infiltrated ceramic network cad/cam single crowns: three-year mid-term results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Prosthodont. 2020 Mar-Apr;33(2):160-8. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6548.

Gusmao GM, De Queiroz TV, Pompeu GF, Menezes Filho PF, da Silva CH. The influence of storage time and pH variation on water sorption by different composite resins. Indian J Dent Res 2013 Jan-Feb;24(1):60-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.114954.

Choi YS, Kang KH, Att W. Evaluation of the response of esthetic restorative materials to ultraviolet aging. J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Oct 8;S0022-3913(20)30471-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.007.

Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva NR, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2015 May-Jun;28(3):227-35. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4244.

Alharbi A, Ardu S, Bortolotto T, Krejci I. Stain susceptibility of composite and ceramic CAD/CAM blocks versus direct resin composites with different resinous matrices. Odontology 2017 Apr;105(2):162-9. doi: 10.1007/s10266-016-0258-1.

Gomez-Polo C, Portillo Munoz M, Lorenzo Luengo MC, Vicente P, Galindo P, Casado AMM. Comparison of two color-difference formulas using the Bland-Altman approach based on natural tooth color space. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Apr;115(4):482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.07.013.

Ren J, Lin H, Huang Q, Zheng G. Determining color difference thresholds in denture base acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Nov;114(5):702-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.06.009.

Akar GC, Pekkan G, Cal E, Eskitascioglu G, Ozcan M. Effects of surface-finishing protocols on the roughness, color change, and translucency of different ceramic systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Aug;112(2):314-21. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.033.

Kanat-Erturk B. Color Stability of CAD/CAM Ceramics prepared with different surface finishing procedures. J Prosthodont. 2020 Feb;29(2):166-72. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13019.

Vita Enamic – Working Instructions. Bad Sackingen: Vita Zahnfabrik. [cited 2021 Mar 10] Available from: http://data.dt-shop.com/fileadmin/media/ga/1034_ga_enu.pdf.

FGM Dental Group. Perfil técnico Brava block. Joinvile: FGM Dental Group; 2019 Feb 1 [cited 2021 Mar 10]. Available from: https://issuu.com/fgmprodutosodontologicos/docs/perfil_brava-block.

Mozzaquatro LR, Rodrigues CS, Kaizer MR, Lago M, Mallmann A, Jacques LB. The effect of brushing and aging on the staining and smoothness of resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017 Apr;29(2):E44-E55. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12293.

Yuan JC, Barao VAR, Wee AG, Alfaro MF, Afshari FS, Sukotjo C. Effect of brushing and thermocycling on the shade and surface roughness of CAD-CAM ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Jun;119(6):1000-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.06.001.

Porto TS, Roperto RC, Akkus A, Akkus O, Teich S, Faddoul F, et al. Effect of storage and aging conditions on the flexural strength and flexural modulus of CAD/CAM materials. Dent Mater J. 2019 Mar;38(2):264-70. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2018-111.

Facenda JC, Borba M, Benetti P, Della Bona A, Corazza PH. Effect of supporting substrate on the failure behavior of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network material. J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Jun;121(6):929-34. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.08.008.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.