Keywords
Dental materials
Dental polishing
How to Cite
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to analyze the influence of finishing and polishing (F/P) protocols on resin surface through roughness (Ra) values and laser scan microscopy observations. Methods: Forty-eight (n=48) resin specimens were sorted into four groups (n=12), according to the type of resin used: Filtek Z250 (Z250), Filtek Z350 (Z350), Filtek One Bulk Fill (BF), Filtek P60 (P60). The specimens were sorted into six groups according to the type of F/P system used (n=2/group): Control group, Diamond bur (KG Sorensen), Soflex Pop-On Discs (3M ESPE), Soflex Spiral (3M ESPE), Dura Gloss (American Burs), and Praxis (TDV). Results: The highest roughness values (Ra) were attributed to BF group for all F/P systems, except for the Soft-Lex PopOn discs. The Soft-Lex PopOn, Spiral, and Praxis discs presented a better performance for the surface treatment of the tested composite resins. Regardless of the restorative material, the use of diamond bur or single-step abrasive rubber (Dura Gloss) were associated with the highest Ra values. Conclusion: The effect of F/P systems on Ra is material-dependent and instrument or system-dependent.
References
Ereifej NS, Oweis YG, Eliades G. The effect of polishing technique on 3-D surface roughness and gloss of dental restorative resin composites. Oper Dent. 2013 Jan-Feb;38(1):E1-12. doi: 10.2341/12-122-L.
Alawjali SS, Lui JL. Effect of one-step polishing system on the color stability of nanocomposites. J Dent. 2013 Aug;41 Suppl 3:e53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.10.008.
Kumari RV, Nagaraj H, Siddaraju K, Poluri RK. Evaluation of the effect of surface polishing, oral beverages and food colorants on color stability and surface roughness of nanocomposite resins. J Int Oral Health. 2015 Jul;7(7):63-70.
Tosco V, Monterubbianesi R, Orilisi G, Procaccini M, Grandini S, Putignano A, et al. Effect of four different finishing and polishing systems on resin composites: roughness surface and gloss retention evaluations. Minerva Stomatol. 2020 Aug;69(4):207-14. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04310-3.
Silva MF, Dias MF, Lins-Filho PC, Silva CH, Guimarães RP. Color stability of Bulk-Fill composite restorations. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Nov;12(11):e1086-90. doi: 10.4317/jced.57579.
Ono M, Nikaido T, Ikeda M, Imai S, Hanada N, Tagami J, et al. Surface properties of resin composite materials relative to biofilm formation. Dent Mater J. 2007 Sep;26(5):613-22. doi: 10.4012/dmj.26.613.
Yap AU, Wu SS, Chelvan S, Tan ES. Effect of hygiene maintenance procedures on surface roughness of composite restoratives. Oper Dent. 2005 Jan-Feb;30(1):99-104.
Daud A, Gray G, Lynch CD, Wilson NHF, Blum IR. A randomised controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy. J Dent. 2018 Apr;71:25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.01.008.
Ishii R, Takamizawa T, Tsujimoto A, Suzuki S, Imai A, Barkmeier WW, et al. Effects of finishing and polishing methods on the surface roughness and surface free energy of bulk-fill resin composites. Oper Dent. 2020 Mar/Apr;45(2):E91-E104. doi: 10.2341/18-246-L.
Sadowsky SJ. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2006 Dec;96(6):433-42. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.09.018.
Costa GFA, Melo AMDS, de Assunção IV, Borges BCD. Impact of additional polishing method on physical, micromorphological, and microtopographical properties of conventional composites and bulk fill. Microsc Res Tech. 2020 Mar;83(3):211-22. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23404.
Kemaloglu H, Karacolak G, Turkun LS. Can reduced-step polishers be as effective as multiple-step polishers in enhancing surface smoothness? J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017 Feb;29(1):31-40. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12233.
Koh R, Neiva G, Dennison J, Yaman P. Finishing systems on the final surface roughness of composites. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Feb;9(2):138-45.
Nasoohi N, Hoorizad M, Tabatabaei SF. Effects of wet and dry finishing and polishing on surface roughness and microhardness of composite resins. J Dent (Tehran). 2017 Mar;14(2):69-75.
Austin RS, Giusca CL, Macaulay G, Moazzez R, Bartlett DW. Confocal laser scanning microscopy and area-scale analysis used to quantify enamel surface textural changes from citric acid demineralization and salivary remineralization in vitro. Dent Mater. 2016 Feb;32(2):278-84. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.016.
Abu-Bakr N, Han L, Okamoto A, Iwaku M. Evaluation of the surface roughness of compomer by laser scanning microscopy. Dent Mater J. 2001 Jun;20(2):172-80. doi: 10.4012/dmj.20.172.
Dias MF, Espíndola-Castro LF, Lins-Filho PC, Teixeira HM, Silva CH, Guimarães RP. Influence of different thermopolymerization methods on composite resin microhardness. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Apr;12(4):e335-41. doi: 10.4317/jced.56772.
Sun D, Shang H, Jiang H. Effective metrology and standard of the surface roughness of micro/nanoscale waveguides with confocal laser scanning microscopy. Opt Lett. 2019 Feb;44(4):747-50. doi: 10.1364/OL.44.000747.
Yadav RD, Raisingani D, Jindal D, Mathur R. A comparative analysis of different finishing and polishing devices on nanofilled, microfilled, and hybrid composite: a scanning electron microscopy and profilometric study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):201-8. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1364.
Bansal K, Gupta S, Nikhil V, Jaiswal S, Jain A, Aggarwal N. Effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of resin composite and enamel: an in vitro profilometric and scanning electron microscopy study. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2019 Jul-Sep;9(3):154-8. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_11_19.
Elbishari H, Silikas N, Satterthwaite JD. Is Deterioration of surface properties of resin composites affected by filler size? Int J Dent. 2020 Jan;2020:2875262. doi: 10.1155/2020/2875262.
Hassan AM, Nabih SM, Mossa HM, Baroudi K. The effect of three polishing systems on surface roughness of flowable, microhybrid, and packable resin composites. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015 May-Jun;5(3):242-7. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.159965.
St-Pierre L, Martel C, Crépeau H, Vargas MA. Influence of polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resins: polishability of composite resins. Oper Dent. 2019 May/Jun;44(3):E122-32. doi: 10.2341/17-140-L.
Ehrmann E, Medioni E, Brulat-Bouchard N. Finishing and polishing effects of multiblade burs on the surface texture of 5 resin composites: microhardness and roughness testing. Restor Dent Endod. 2018 Nov 26;44(1):e1. doi: 10.5395/rde.2019.44.e1.
Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, Ambrosano GM. Effects of various finishing systems on the surface roughness and staining susceptibility of packable composite resins. Dent Mater. 2003 Jan;19(1):12-8. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(02)00014-3.
Gönülol N, Yilmaz F. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. J Dent. 2012 Dec;40 Suppl 2:e64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.005.
Gonçalves MA, Teixeira VC, Rodrigues SS, de Oliveira RS, Salvio LA. Evaluation of the roughness of composite resins submitted to different surface treatments. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2012;25(1):89-95.
Avsar A, Yuzbasioglu E, Sarac D. The effect of finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness and the color of nanocomposite resin restorative materials. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;24(5):881-90. doi: 10.17219/acem/23971.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Kayo Matheus Rodrigues de Souza, Roberto Victor de Melo Silva, Marlon Ferreira Dias, Paulo Cardoso Lins-Filho, Claudio Heliomar Vicente da Silva, Renata Pedrosa Guimarães
Downloads
